Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pollster says he can't find Christianity transforming lives
Los Angeles Times | Published Sep 28, 2002 | William Lobdell

Posted on 09/30/2002 9:19:01 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain

VENTURA, Calif. -- Pollster George Barna, known these days as the bearer of bad tidings about the state of Christianity in America, arrived in his office a few minutes late for a 10 a.m. appointment.

His hair was ruffled; his eyes puffy. Shoulders slouched. Being the George Gallup of the conservative evangelical world is a heavy burden for Barna, who often works into the early morning, deciphering numbers generated by his surveys to find church trends.

The 48-year-old author of 30 books, who describes himself as a raging introvert, is a popular national speaker. And he produces enough in-your-face statistics and blunt talk to irritate pastors, cost him business and earn a reputation for having, as one magazine put it, "the gift of discouragement."

His data undercut some of the core beliefs that should, by definition, set evangelicals apart from their more liberal brethren. Findings of his polls show, for example, that:

• The divorce rate is no different for born-again Christians than for those who do not consider themselves religious.

• Only a minority of born-again adults (44 percent) and a tiny proportion of born-again teenagers (9 percent) are certain that absolute moral truth exists.

• Most Christians' votes are influenced more by economic self-interest than by spiritual and moral values.

• Desiring to have a close, personal relationship with God ranks sixth among the 21 life goals tested among born-agains, trailing such desires as "living a comfortable lifestyle."

'Are people's lives being transformed" by Christianity? Barna has asked. "We can't find evidence of a transformation."

Even Barna's toughest critics concede that Barna Research Group's polls carry considerable weight because of his first-rate surveying techniques and his 17-year-long record of tracking church and cultural trends.

His work has been used by major companies (Ford Motor Co. and Walt Disney, for example) and religious organizations such as the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association and World Vision.

"He is the accepted authority on church trends," said Bob Cavin, director of the Texas Baptist Leadership Center. "He gives pastors insight, not only into the effectiveness of the church, but with trends in society that help the pastors with their strategic planning."

Because of his influence, many are watching with interest as Barna branches out from his usual business. He has been preoccupied with quantifying contemporary Christian beliefs, attitudes and practices; comparing them with biblical truths; and delivering the results to pastors, Christian leaders and laity. He said that he once hoped his analyses would be used as building blocks for more relevant churches.

But he decided this year to take a more active role by helping to identify and develop new and better church leaders who will boldly go where their predecessors haven't gone before: to radically revamp the church. He said he believes the process will take decades -- generations -- to complete.

"One of our challenges is to revisit the structures and means through which people experience Christ," Barna said. "People have been talking about developing the 'new church' for the past several decades, but nothing new has been forthcoming."

According to Barna, pastors are great teachers, but not necessarily adept at leadership. To back up his claim, he cited one of his own polls: It showed that only 12 percent of senior pastors say they have the spiritual gift of leadership and 8 percent say they have the gift of evangelism. In contrast, two-thirds say they have the gift of teaching or preaching.

"We, not God, have created a system that doesn't work and that we're reluctant to change."

Barna also is in the early stages of establishing a genuine and appealing Christian presence in secular entities: film, music, media and politics. He has identified these as the institutions that hold the most influence over Americans.

What's needed are "skilled professionals who love Christ and model his ways through their thoughts, words and behavior in enviable and biblically consistent ways," he said.

For Barna, the need for better leadership and better Christian role models in the secular world was underscored by a poll he released this month.

9/11 opportunity lost

The survey showed that the Sept. 11 attacks had virtually no lasting effects on America's faith, despite a 20 percent rise in church attendance during the first few weeks afterward.

"We missed a huge opportunity," he said, adding that, because of their own shallow faith, church regulars needed so much reassurance themselves that they couldn't minister to newcomers.

This kind of comment bothers evangelical Christians.

Mike Regele, author of "The Death of the Church," is one of many who believe the Barna Research Group's statistical work is excellent, but the conclusions drawn by the company's founder are too harsh.

The hypocrisy of Christians, Regele said, "has been a part of the church, probably since the day of Pentecost" and doesn't indicate its collapse.

"It sounds like he's very, very angry at the church," said Regele, a church critic himself who is ultimately an optimist. "There are reasons to be disappointed, but scripture never said we'd be perfect. We shouldn't view the whole institution as a failure."

With each new Barna poll or book, the attacks begin again: He's too negative; he has it in for pastors; he's arrogant.

The criticism "would affect any human being," said Barna, a husband and father of two. "We all want to be loved and accepted by others, but we also have a higher calling to which we each must be true."

Barna said he has learned painfully that giving advice on how to revitalize churches in America is a hugely complex proposition that doesn't fit well into sound bites. He has learned to be more guarded.

Although his statistics often show self-described Christians living lives no different from those of atheists, Barna's faith never has wavered.

"The issue isn't whether Jesus or Christianity is real," he said. "The issue is, are Americans willing to put Christ first in their lives?


TOPICS: Current Events; General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: not; transforminglives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 1,101-1,105 next last
To: theAmbassador
No, ksen, jude's statement is not extreme; it is at the heart of how a man approaches evangelism.

Hi Ambassador, pleased to meet you.

Would it be fair, in your view, for someone antagonistic towards Calivinism to make a ridiculous exaggeration about the consequences of Calvinistic beliefs and claim they were natural consequences of Calvinism?

821 posted on 10/03/2002 10:05:19 AM PDT by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 818 | View Replies]

To: Itsfreewill; drstevej; RnMomof7; Wrigley; fortheDeclaration; winstonchurchill; ShadowAce; ...
Way to go, IFW. All one can ask is putting the cards on the table. You've done that.

So, do I understand you to say that restornu was accidentally closed and that IFW will be your permanent name from now on?

Many have confessed to multiple handles. I don't really mind as long as they're honest about it when detected. Many have wives, other family members who use FR. When they sign on, that's the handle that's up at the time. Easier to just post than go logout, login.

What denomination were you before LDS? Didn't you say you BECAME an LDS?

822 posted on 10/03/2002 10:05:28 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 819 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I was a mainline mutt, than around 12 I attened the Presbyterian Chruch, baptized at age 16 left at age 35!
823 posted on 10/03/2002 10:16:58 AM PDT by Itsfreewill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 822 | View Replies]

To: xzins; RnMomof7; drstevej; RochesterFan; Wrigley; theAmbassador; JesseShurun
You mean there's no donkeys in heaven? Now I wonder what this verse means.... Somehow, I don't think that the LORD has it in mind that the Jews break the necks of donkeys, despite the fact that a donkey is a ceremonially unclean animal. Hmmmm!
824 posted on 10/03/2002 10:18:37 AM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]

To: xzins; RnMomof7
You mean there's no donkeys in heaven?

***

ARE YOU SURE IF AN ASP IS THERE WHY NOT A DONKEY!

ISAIAH 11

Stem of Jesse (Christ) shall judge in righteousness—The knowledge of God shall cover the earth in the Millennium—The Lord shall raise an ensign and gather Israel—Compare 2 Nephi 21.

1 AND there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots:

2 And the spirit of the LORD shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD;

3 And shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the LORD: and he shall not judge after the sight of his eyes, neither reprove after the hearing of his ears:

4 But with righteousness shall he judge the poor, and reprove with equity for the meek of the earth: and he shall smite the earth with the rod of his mouth, and with the breath of his lips shall he slay the wicked.

5 And righteousness shall be the girdle of his loins, and faithfulness the girdle of his reins.

6 The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.

7 And the cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox.

8 And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the ASP, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice’ den.

9 They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain: for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the LORD, as the waters cover the sea.

10 ¶ And in that day there shall be a root of Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people; to it shall the Gentiles seek: and his rest shall be glorious.

11 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the Lord shall set his hand again the second time to recover the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria, and from Egypt, and from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, and from Shinar, and from Hamath, and from the islands of the sea.

12 And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.

13 The envy also of Ephraim shall depart, and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off: Ephraim shall not envy Judah, and Judah shall not vex Ephraim.

14 But they shall fly upon the shoulders of the Philistines toward the west; they shall spoil them of the east together: they shall lay their hand upon Edom and Moab; and the children of Ammon shall obey them.

15 And the LORD shall utterly destroy the tongue of the Egyptian sea; and with his mighty wind shall he shake his hand over the river, and shall smite it in the seven streams, and make men go over dryshod.

16 And there shall be an highway for the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria; like as it was to Israel in the day that he came up out of the land of Egypt.


825 posted on 10/03/2002 10:36:05 AM PDT by Itsfreewill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I can't think of other religions that are saying they wish they could be rescued by Jesus....they all want to do it their way, I guess. In fact, I don't know of any of them that think the Jesus story is true. Ergo, in many ways it's a moot point.

Are you now joining the other side? Is it impossible that someone could be filled with the Spirit of Christ and still be ignorant of the "story" of Jesus and His name?

SD

826 posted on 10/03/2002 10:39:55 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 805 | View Replies]

To: ksen; jude24
Would it be fair, in your view, for someone antagonistic towards Calivinism to make a ridiculous exaggeration about the consequences of Calvinistic beliefs and claim they were natural consequences of Calvinism?

Hey, it happens all the time. The majority of the venom I encounter comes from the Arminians. They just seem to take rejection of their humanism personally. Calvinists, OTOH, expect to be rejected. The true gospel of Biblical Calvinism is offensive; it divides and drives many away.

It also happens to be true that jude's comment is neither ridiculous or exaggerated. A great many Arminians are frozen by terror with regard to preaching the gospel to the lost. They happen to think that they should get them to a church and let the preacher do it. This way, they will not say anything wrong. Unfortunately, this is not the purpose of the church.

The real problem is in the fact that Arminians truly don't believe that man is dead; they don't realize that dead is hostility to God, not an inability to respond to God. They add to that the fact that they believe God can't interfere because the final choice must be the man's. Therefore, the burden falls upon 2 men to get it all right; one to preach and the other to hear. If one of them messes up, then there is no conversion.

All I can say is thank God for inconsistent Arminians who act like God is sovereign over salvation.
827 posted on 10/03/2002 10:44:43 AM PDT by theAmbassador
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies]

To: theAmbassador
The true gospel of Biblical Calvinism is offensive; it divides and drives many away.

This is so much codswallop as well. Calvinists go out of there way to be offensive and then congratulate themselves on being "oppressed" for God's sake. It speaks to the neurosis that requires constant re-assurance, and the deliverance from consequence that drives the believer.

SD

828 posted on 10/03/2002 10:52:44 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 827 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
I'm not being argumentative, Dave, but I don't understand your point and question. Would you mind rephrasing and/or expanding? Thanks. Z
829 posted on 10/03/2002 10:53:02 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 826 | View Replies]

To: xzins; drstevej
Apparently Drj. still thinks that "helkuo" always means 'drag.' Maybe in Attic Greek, but the New Testament wasn't written in Attic; it was written in Koine. See again Free Grace or Forced Grace?
830 posted on 10/03/2002 10:55:37 AM PDT by The Grammarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 811 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody; angelo
Issachar is a strong-boned donkey".

Now what was so special about Issachar that he was so highly regarded? If you know the old T you know. Calling someone a donkey in this context is a compliment. Maybe the fake Jew knows.

831 posted on 10/03/2002 10:58:38 AM PDT by JesseShurun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies]

To: xzins
No problem. In order to be "saved" by Jesus is it absolutely necessary that one be aware of the Jesus story and to know Jesus' name?

Or could one living in ignorance (through no fault of his own) be filled with the Spirit of God, be a member of the Body of Christ, be "saved", be "elect," whatever, without knowing the story or name?

Does being "saved" require this knowledge?

SD

832 posted on 10/03/2002 10:58:48 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies]

To: JesseShurun; angelo; SoothingDave; ksen; OLD REGGIE; RnMomof7; Iowegian; RobbyS; al_c; D-fendr; ...
Maybe the fake Jew knows.

Listen bud, angelo is a JEW, I and many others have known him for over a year and a half, and we know him as a man of honor, hes not a Christian, but he is a man of his word, and we all respect him for that, if you continue to slander him, you do do at your own risk.

BigMack

833 posted on 10/03/2002 11:14:29 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: theAmbassador
All I can say is thank God for inconsistent Arminians who act like God is sovereign over salvation.

Ok, then I can guess I can thank God for the inconsistent Calvinists who act like they need to present the Gospel to the lost in order to give them a chance to hear. ;^)

834 posted on 10/03/2002 11:14:38 AM PDT by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 827 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Someone can claim all sorts of things for whatever reason. If he has read the OT "thoroughly" as he claims, let him defend himself. If your hobby is bullying, take it to the back room.
835 posted on 10/03/2002 11:17:43 AM PDT by JesseShurun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 833 | View Replies]

To: ksen
Ok, then I can guess I can thank God for the inconsistent Calvinists who act like they need to present the Gospel to the lost in order to give them a chance to hear. ;^)

LOL...how come their talking to us if were not the CHOSEN ONES anyway? Seems like a waste of time to me. :)

BigMack

836 posted on 10/03/2002 11:18:40 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 834 | View Replies]

To: JesseShurun; angelo
Someone can claim all sorts of things for whatever reason. If he has read the OT "thoroughly" as he claims, let him defend himself. If your hobby is bullying, take it to the back room.

He can defend himself quite well in the OT, he doesn't need me for that, I don't agree with him, but I don't slander him because of it like you have, BIG difference bud.

BigMack

837 posted on 10/03/2002 11:23:30 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 835 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
This has nothing to do with you buttinsky so go harrass someone else. I'll wait while he does a google search but he won't find the answer. He claims to have read the OT "thoroughly" and he claims that I have not. Therefore let him answer a simple question and "well known" answer about one of the 12 tribes. If that's slander, then he has slandered me and we're even.
838 posted on 10/03/2002 11:29:05 AM PDT by JesseShurun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 837 | View Replies]

To: JesseShurun
Maybe the fake Jew knows.

Maybe you'd like angelo to walk around like this in order to prove he is Jewish to you:

Question angelo's knowledge of the OT all you want, but to call him a "fake Jew" is extremely offensive.

839 posted on 10/03/2002 11:39:10 AM PDT by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: ksen
Ok, I won't call him fake anymore, but his claim to have "thorough" knowledge of the Holy Torah I am calling fake until he proves otherwise. This question about one of the twelve tribes is basic knowledge. Perhaps it will provoke him to jealousy to actually study the Word, something that he should have a true passion for already. For my money, I'll say that the calvinist Woody finds it first.
840 posted on 10/03/2002 11:44:12 AM PDT by JesseShurun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 839 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 1,101-1,105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson