Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins; drstevej
I suspect that you know it is a real question xzins one that leaves gaps in what you believe .

I do not see how you reconcile your two statements.

Did Christ die for all men?. Does all mean all of every kind? Or was it not an atonemet at all? Was it simple an opportunity for the men that figured it out to be saved?

You know this is an important doctrinal question posed with my usual two left feet..but it is the basis of what we believe

If you do not want to explain what you believe and why you believe it I think there is a spot for you at hobbits hole :>)

49 posted on 07/27/2002 9:15:29 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: RnMomof7; fortheDeclaration; winstonchurchill; The Grammarian; Revelation 911
Did Christ die for all men?. Does all mean all of every kind?

Thanks for the real question.

Christ's death was sufficient to cover the sin of all men of all time AND God's desire was that all men be saved.

The terms of the covenant, however, were that men had to believe in order to appropriate the benefit of the sacrifice. The sacrifice was effective for believers only.

To God Believing is not a work of righteousness per Romans 4:5...In this scripture, on the one hand you have "work" and on the other hand you have "belief."

Romans 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

51 posted on 07/27/2002 9:31:42 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson