1 posted on
07/01/2002 6:40:04 PM PDT by
narses
To: narses
It would help understanding this article, if Ferrara provided a definition of 'schism' or 'schismatic act', preferably with reference to the Code of Canon Law. My suspicions are raised when his long discussion lacks such a definition, especially discussion involving subjective states of mind.
To: narses
Again, Narses, you have demonstrated the malice and disdain that the SSPX and it's spokesmen have for the Roman Catholic Church. Recently, you spread falsehoods concerning the Vatican's relationship with the FSSP. The implication there is that the Holy See is untrustworthy. Now, you are spreading accusations of hypocrisy and injustice.
Why don't you just come out and say that you dispise the Holy Roman Catholic Church and that your leaders have no intention of attaining any kind of arrangement as the Pontiff would see as suitable? Do you think that the constant barrage against Rome and the pope does anything to facilitate communion with Rome. You are being duped, and your posts are nothing short of scandalous. I really wish the SSPX'ers would just come out and say that they hate the Church, and that hatred is what fuels these petty, ignorant, self-serving, disingenuous, uncharitable allegations. The SSPX is a schismatic, protestant cult. You would be well-served by cutting your ties to this group...immediately. Forgive my bluntness.
3 posted on
07/01/2002 7:54:41 PM PDT by
St.Chuck
To: narses
To: narses
BTTT for later reading.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson