To: Doc On The Bay; Swordmaker; vannrox; Confederate Keyester; Aquinasfan; goody2shooz; Psalm 73; ...
FYI
25 posted on
06/24/2002 9:39:09 PM PDT by
medved
To: medved
Referencing my post 17, the talk origins folks must not consider the differential use of flapping appendages to escape predators as selection pressure. They must consider the ground up theory of flight "blowhardism". Don't chickens tend to flap things when chased?
26 posted on
06/24/2002 9:44:36 PM PDT by
AndrewC
To: medved
Thanks for the PING, medved.
Although (GASP!) I believe in the Biblical version of creation, I find the theory you put forth very interesting, as I do parts of Macro-Evolution theory.
After being involved in a few nasty flame wars recently, I vowed not to get involved in any discussion where posters are not being civil, as I have a tendency to respond in kind.
Keep pinging me on this, though - I love to read your posts.
31 posted on
06/25/2002 4:58:13 AM PDT by
Psalm 73
To: medved
Its hard to convice people that don't want to be convinced that their religion(evilution) is wrong. They can be shown over and over and over that you can refute there idea and few leave it do to there pride(I think). The mammoth amount of information required for every species on earth and the fact that each system is dependent on the others to exist is enough to realize that 'evilution' is IMPOSSIBLE. However, the 'evilutionists' are so confounded in there religion, they do not understand the word "impossible". When that happens it seems to me that there is nothing more that can help them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson