Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calvinism Misses the Point of Grace
The Baptist Standard ^ | Mar 99 | Frank Page, pastor of Warren Baptist Church

Posted on 05/23/2002 8:27:47 PM PDT by xzins

Calvinism misses point of grace, speaker says

Looking at God's grace through a Calvinistic view is missing what God means by grace, a pastor told students at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary March 4.

"Calvinism presents a God who arbitrarily selects some to be saved and some to be lost," Frank Page, pastor of Warren Baptist Church in Augusta, Ga., said in a chapel sermon. Grace, he said, is not a term of selection but an expression of love and acceptance.

Calvinism is a theological system outlined by the 17th century Reformer John Calvin. It is built around five central points, of which the most controversial is the notion that Christ died only to save certain people and not others.

Proponents of Calvinism--a growing group among Southern Baptists today, including the presidents of two Southern Baptist seminaries--often call their theology "doctrines of grace." But Page asserted the Calvinistic perspective misses the most important nature of grace.

"It portrays a nature of God who is capricious and even cruel in his selection of those who would be elect and non-elect," he said.

Page cautioned that by seeing a God who selects his children randomly with no concern for the lost, Christians are not genuinely seeing who God is.


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: calvinism; capricious; grace; theology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
The major charges against calvinism by Southern Baptist Pastor Page:

1. Calvinism teaches a god who has no real concern for the lost.

2. Calvinism teaches a capricious and cruel god.

1 posted on 05/23/2002 8:27:48 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; fortheDeclaration; winstonchurchill; ShadowAce; P-Marlowe; Revelation 911...
bump for your consideration
2 posted on 05/23/2002 8:39:01 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Grace, he said, is not a term of selection but an expression of love and acceptance.

Thanks for the post bro.

3 posted on 05/23/2002 8:46:39 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; fortheDeclaration; WinstonChurchill; ShadowAce; P-Marlowe; Revelation 911...
Aside from the major charges he levels against the doctrine, the line you picked out is what I want to discuss. "Grace is an expression of love and acceptance." That is what the word "grace" means in the classic hymn, "Amazing Grace."

Amazing Grace is WHAT saved a wretch like me. Grace is about reaching out to the lost. It's about loving the unlovable.

How in the world can you turn "grace" into a "select and sort" word? That's such a gross distortion.

4 posted on 05/23/2002 8:51:31 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I'm out for the nite. See you tomorrow.
5 posted on 05/23/2002 8:59:27 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
Blessings, and may the Eternal grant rest, peace, and restoration.
6 posted on 05/23/2002 9:04:17 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: drstevej; Jerry_M; RnMomof7; Jean Chauvin; rdb3
Wow, the non-Calvinist want to keep talking about grace. Ok, I'm cool with that....

What do you want to bet that when I start posting Biblical refutations of the Arminian version of grace that the Arminians get nasty again? Let's see, perhaps I might start with a few "quotable quotes" from Arminians....

7 posted on 05/23/2002 9:19:58 PM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Aside from the major charges he levels against the doctrine, the line you picked out is what I want to discuss. "Grace is an expression of love and acceptance." That is what the word "grace" means in the classic hymn, "Amazing Grace." Amazing Grace is WHAT saved a wretch like me. Grace is about reaching out to the lost. It's about loving the unlovable. How in the world can you turn "grace" into a "select and sort" word? That's such a gross distortion.

Amen! Love is the motivating virtue of God! It is why He began to create in the first place, to share His own happiness with other creatures.

The Glory that He receives comes from His desire to to this, not from that fact that He is omnipotent!

Calvinism makes Power the primary attribute with God, but Power could not avoid the Cross.

Justice demanded a payment for sin and only Love would be willing to meet that demand.

God with all His Power still had to obey His own virtues!

That God would be willing to do this for man (Ps.8) (not just a chosen few) is beyond man's capacity to imagine.(Rom.5:6-8)

8 posted on 05/23/2002 9:22:26 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
Election is a term of love and acceptance. Was for Israel, is for us!
9 posted on 05/23/2002 9:24:45 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"It portrays a nature of God who is capricious and even cruel in his selection of those who would be elect and non-elect," he said.

Gee, have I heard that somewhere before? This guy has nailed it. Capricious and cruel? Sure, the local construct defenders will defend that. They'll call it "good pleasure."

10 posted on 05/23/2002 9:27:48 PM PDT by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill;xzins
Yet it was the LORD’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer..."

A critic might demand: Is this not a cruel God? If no, prove it is not! You biblicists have a capricious and cruel God!

====

Get the point? Your charge of capriciousness and cruelty to God because of His sovereign election is no less repulsive.

11 posted on 05/23/2002 9:39:44 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Election is a term of love and acceptance.

I'm sorry, but it's a term of arbitrary exclusion and misplaced elitism which has no part in the Christian Gospel.

The concept of 'election' in your construct is only a term of 'love and acceptance' to the few (admittedly) non-meritorious 'winners' in the prehistoric Powerball lottery. However, it is a term of hatred, viciousness and arbitrary rejection to the many-fold lottery 'losers' who, according to your construct, were excluded without hope or opportunity long before they were born. That hardly qualifies as 'good news' to those excluded.

I am sorry because, unlike so many of your colleagues here, you are a kind and thoughtful person with a wonderful family. But you have subscribed to a fearful view of Jesus, which recasts Him as an unbelievable ogre, 'rejoicing' in the eternal torment of people excluded without hope from the beginning of time -- people for whom, in reality He died. I shudder to think about it -- because it is such pure evil. It is message of hatred, vitriol, and exclusion unworthy of you.

Praise God, it is also wholly false. Christ died for all and offers to all who accept Him, life abundant and life eternal.

12 posted on 05/23/2002 9:46:46 PM PDT by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill
I appreciate the few kind words regarding me personally. The remainder of the post, Winston is filled with caricature of my position. If you insist in drawing conclusions for me and telling me what I believe -- I have nothing to say.

You call "my views" pure evil. If that's what you think, fine. Please refer to me as the Evil Calvinist.

Was God cruel to crush His Son for us and to cause Him to suffer? Isaiah 53:10 --- I don't think so. Do you?

13 posted on 05/23/2002 9:58:50 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill; drstevej
Is it possible for God to have a real concern for the lost if 50% or more were sent to hell by him without any regard AT ALL toward saving them.
14 posted on 05/23/2002 10:01:59 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: drstevej; WinstonChurchill; Corin Stormhands; fortheDeclaration
Was God cruel to crush His Son for us and to cause Him to suffer? Isaiah 53:10 --- I don't think so. Do you?

Steve, God crushed Jesus in that he sent him to the cross. This is the same God who foretold the glorious resurrection for this Son.

However, with the "elected lost" it is not a temporary sentence. According to calvinism, PRIOR to their EVER HAVING LIVED, he sends these prelected lost to eternal torment in hell with no hope ever of reprieve. (And they call that "grace?"

It's just bad theology.

15 posted on 05/23/2002 10:07:53 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Answer the question, Was God cruel to crush His Son?
16 posted on 05/23/2002 10:11:27 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Did you ever respond to my post #698 where your confusion of election and salvation is challenged? Or do you only ask questions?
17 posted on 05/23/2002 10:14:19 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: drstevej; WinstonChurchill; fortheDeclaration; Corin Stormhands
I did answer it in #15. I said God was not cruel. However, I also said we're comparing apples with oranges. I believe your argument was: if God is NOT cruel in crushing his Son, then he is NOT cruel in crushing those he preselected to be lost.

Do I express your argument correctly?

18 posted on 05/23/2002 10:15:42 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: drstevej; WinstonChurchill
this is a different thread....that was the "amazing grace" thread. I"ll go check to see if I answered your question....however, I'll answer it on that thread...not on this one.
19 posted on 05/23/2002 10:17:38 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Xzins, make your case to a double predestinarian. That isn't my position. My recent freepmail reminded you of this.
20 posted on 05/23/2002 10:22:28 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson