[rdb3]

You do not know if I have 'morphed from right to left'.

I most certainly do. You either morphed, or, were always on the Left.

If you are of the belief that not agreeing with the party line on every issue means a person is some sort of 'traitor', you should join the socialist party.

I loathe the Left. Wait. Loathe is too nice a word. Anyway, I dispise the Left, so, I'd never be a socialist, communist, or any other thing associated with the Left.

And, for you edification, violence perpetrated by slaves against masters did exist. Hence laws that prevented congregations of more than 5 slaves in a particular area, curfew laws, etc.

Correct! Even still, violence was not a viable option, was it? If this was the case, why is it somehow "justifiable" for the Palis to use it? Like I said, right is right, and wrong is wrong. The Palis are absolutely wrong.

[preacher_man]

Correct! Even still, violence was not a viable option, was it? If this was the case, why is it somehow "justifiable" for the Palis to use it? Like I said, right is right, and wrong is wrong. The Palis are absolutely wrong.

My first post here was about exactly this; people using the concepts of "understanding why somebody does something" and "thinking they were justified in what they did" as if they were the same thing, just as you did above.

They are not the same.

Please read before you post.