[preacher_man]

Correct! Even still, violence was not a viable option, was it? If this was the case, why is it somehow "justifiable" for the Palis to use it? Like I said, right is right, and wrong is wrong. The Palis are absolutely wrong.

My first post here was about exactly this; people using the concepts of "understanding why somebody does something" and "thinking they were justified in what they did" as if they were the same thing, just as you did above.

They are not the same.

Please read before you post.

[rdb3]

My first post here was about exactly this; people using the concepts of "understanding why somebody does something" and "thinking they were justified in what they did" as if they were the same thing, just as you did above.

And you think I don't read before posting? Fool! Unjustifiable is unjustifiable. THAT is my point, preecha. They are not the same thing, as I most certainly have asserted. Now you say it and it's somehow supposed to be an epiphany for me?

Puh-leeeeze!