To: xzins; fortheDeclaration; P-Marlowe; ShadowAce; CCWoody; the_doc; OrthodoxPresbyterian; RnMomof7...
"All of these add to a different JUDICIAL dispensation for those WHO HAVE NOT HEARD." That is what our friend Winston Churchill would call a 'construct.'
It's not in the text of God's word, it's in your desire to see unbelievers get a "chance" much like Mormons invented vicarious baptism to give them a "chance."
To: editor-surveyor; Jean Chauvin;
The bible is the source for the interpretations above on foreknowledge, ordination, and rejection. These are the things I believe and on which I stand. I can do no other, for there is no other interpretation that takes as much scripture into account as these.
They are a better contruct than is the calvinist construct. God has given Chuck Smith a better understanding than he gave to John Calvin. He has also given him a more loving spirit.
76 posted on
04/18/2002 9:31:54 AM PDT by
xzins
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson