Ok. But that means you'll have to change your presentation as well.
We disagree on interpretation of various things in the Bible. But I don't disparage you that you don't respect the Book.
Its not just a matter of different interpretation when you dismiss out of hand an historical element in the Bible.
Why can't we have honest differences without the slurs?
Not a slur if it's a fact. Is the historical account of the Noadic flood confirmed in the New Testament or not?
That IS</b your interpretation.
Why can't we have honest differences without the slurs?
Not a slur if it's a fact. Is the historical account of the Noadic flood confirmed in the New Testament or not?
I don't think so.
SD