Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Invincibly Ignorant
Its not just a matter of different interpretation when you dismiss out of hand an historical element in the Bible.

That IS</b your interpretation.

Why can't we have honest differences without the slurs?

Not a slur if it's a fact. Is the historical account of the Noadic flood confirmed in the New Testament or not?

I don't think so.

SD

7,559 posted on 05/01/2002 10:39:48 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7556 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
ME Not a slur if it's a fact. Is the historical account of the Noadic flood confirmed in the New Testament or not?

YOU I don't think so.

I know so.

Matthew 24:38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,

Luke 17:27 They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.

Hebrews 11:7 By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith.

1 Peter 3:20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

2 Peter 2:5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;

7,575 posted on 05/01/2002 11:17:57 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7559 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson