The links in #365 have plenty of evidence for macroevolution. Even if I posted, verbatim, from the 30-odd links listed, you would still claim no one presented you with any evidence. You've done so in the past. Even when we excerpt from a particular thread, as in the whale evolution arguments earlier, you don't read the actual wording there (I point out your claim that we said whales and coyotes were related). I suppose this is an effort on your part to truthfully say that you've never seen any evidence for macroevolution, but it is not from lack of effort on our parts -- it is from lack of effort on yours. Besides, I'm not going to spam this thread, or any other, with reams of verbage when the magic of the internet allows me to simply link to the references and interested parties (a group wherein you obviously do not fall) to read them or not to read them at their convenience. I am not medved. I will not force people with slow modems to wait for eternity while a thread downloads. Now, if you do not want to make the effort to link out to the threads given, that's your choice, but do not come back and say no one has ever presented evidence for macroevolution - that would be a bald-faced lie. Simply say that people have posted links to evidence for macroevolution and you have neither the time nor the inclination* to click on a particular link to see what's really out there.
*That is one reason the Italians thought to put a clock in the Leaning Tower of Pisa - If you've got the inclination, you might as well have the time.
As I have said before, this is not a private discussion - let the others see your greatness! Stop making excuses! Give one proof Junior, just one!