Examine all you wish. The point I made has been fully supported, some Darwinians are practiced purveyors of misrepresentation. That particular quirk was all that I addressed. As for why people do not put themselves in the position of these Darwinians, I supposed that it was the flimsiness of the locale.
None of the examples of which I am aware were in your point. I can think of Piltdown Man and Archaeoraptor. Mesonychus was not a misrepresentation. It's a real fossil animal with a confusingly cetacean-looking skull. Nothing done with teeth or replicas was misrepresented.
How many creationist frauds have littered these threads since they started on FR?