None of the examples of which I am aware were in your point. I can think of Piltdown Man and Archaeoraptor. Mesonychus was not a misrepresentation. It's a real fossil animal with a confusingly cetacean-looking skull. Nothing done with teeth or replicas was misrepresented.
How many creationist frauds have littered these threads since they started on FR?
Well, here have another.
To: No-Kin-To-Monkeys It's very difficult to think...without the clear guidance of scripture. That about sums up the mentality of the opposition. |
That pretty well misrepresents what was written. A specific instance was represented as a general event.
Suppose you tell us Vade instead of making broad, totally unsupported attacks on your opponents?