I finding myself thinking this about gore's posts and occasionally saying as much. I generally hope that people can read and do click links and do examine statements logically.
This question is first addressed to me in the post this is answering.
Yes, but as you point out . . .
I started this particular interchange by pointing out what you again demonstrate. Misrepresentation.
You started this interchange replying to a post in which I wonder why Cs cannot put on an E hat. You wish to derail any further examination of this question. I don't wonder.
This is not a mere canard. It's a clinical symptom. It's really very puzzling. Some of these people have been arguing against evolution for a long time, yet they cannot reason the simplest thing in an evolutionary framework. They can't get the hat on.
Examine all you wish. The point I made has been fully supported, some Darwinians are practiced purveyors of misrepresentation. That particular quirk was all that I addressed. As for why people do not put themselves in the position of these Darwinians, I supposed that it was the flimsiness of the locale.
Okay, I accept the challenge. Suddenly, I'm an evolutionist. I can pretend, for a while, to be a Godless, Satanic, deluded fool. No heaven for me, no hell for you, just the blind, unguided forces of nature, and death is our reward, being only senseless oblivion. Meaningless, all meaningless. I can play the game. Test me, or wise one.
If Dataman were still on these threads, there'd be picture after picture by now of people in funny hats.