Posted on 08/26/2026 8:27:39 AM PDT by annalex
Wednesday of week 21 in Ordinary Time Iglesia de San Antolín, Spain, with likeness of St Teresa Jornet Ibars displayed Readings at MassLiturgical Colour: Green. Year: A(II).
We worked night and day not to be a burden on youIn the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, we urge you, brothers, to keep away from any of the brothers who refuses to work or to live according to the tradition we passed on to you. You know how you are supposed to imitate us: now we were not idle when we were with you, nor did we ever have our meals at anyone’s table without paying for them; no, we worked night and day, slaving and straining, so as not to be a burden on any of you. This was not because we had no right to be, but in order to make ourselves an example for you to follow. We gave you a rule when we were with you: do not let anyone have any food if he refuses to do any work. May the Lord of peace himself give you peace all the time and in every way. The Lord be with you all. From me, PAUL, these greetings in my own handwriting, which is the mark of genuineness in every letter; this is my own writing. May the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all.
O blessed are those who fear the Lord. O blessed are those who fear the Lord and walk in his ways! By the labour of your hands you shall eat. You will be happy and prosper. O blessed are those who fear the Lord. Indeed thus shall be blessed the man who fears the Lord. May the Lord bless you from Zion all the days of your life! O blessed are those who fear the Lord.
Alleluia, alleluia! Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God. Alleluia!
Alleluia, alleluia! Whenever anyone obeys what Christ has said, God’s love comes to perfection in him. Alleluia!
You are the sons of those who murdered the prophetsJesus said: ‘Alas for you, scribes and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You who are like whitewashed tombs that look handsome on the outside, but inside are full of dead men’s bones and every kind of corruption. In the same way you appear to people from the outside like good honest men, but inside you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness. ‘Alas for you, scribes and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You who build the sepulchres of the prophets and decorate the tombs of holy men, saying, “We would never have joined in shedding the blood of the prophets, had we lived in our fathers’ day.” So! Your own evidence tells against you! You are the sons of those who murdered the prophets! Very well then, finish off the work that your fathers began.’ Christian Art![]() Each day, The Christian Art website gives a picture and reflection on the Gospel of the day. The readings on this page are from the Jerusalem Bible, which is used at Mass in most of the English-speaking world. The New American Bible readings, which are used at Mass in the United States, are available in the Universalis apps, programs and downloads. |
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
KEYWORDS: catholic; mt23; ordinarytime; prayer

Please FReepmail me to get on/off the Alleluia Ping List.
| Matthew | |||
| English: Douay-Rheims | Latin: Vulgata Clementina | Greek NT: Byzantine/Majority Text (2000) | |
| Matthew 23 | |||
| 27. | Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you are like to whited sepulchres, which outwardly appear to men beautiful, but within are full of dead men's bones, and of all filthiness. | Væ vobis scribæ et pharisæi hypocritæ, quia similes estis sepulchris dealbatis, quæ a foris parent hominibus speciosa, intus vero pleni sunt ossibus mortuorum, et omni spurcitia ! | ουαι υμιν γραμματεις και φαρισαιοι υποκριται οτι παρομοιαζετε ταφοις κεκονιαμενοις οιτινες εξωθεν μεν φαινονται ωραιοι εσωθεν δε γεμουσιν οστεων νεκρων και πασης ακαθαρσιας |
| 28. | So you also outwardly indeed appear to men just; but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. | Sic et vos a foris quidem paretis hominibus justi : intus autem pleni estis hypocrisi et iniquitate. | ουτως και υμεις εξωθεν μεν φαινεσθε τοις ανθρωποις δικαιοι εσωθεν δε μεστοι εστε υποκρισεως και ανομιας |
| 29. | Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; that build the sepulchres of the prophets, and adorn the monuments of the just, | Væ vobis scribæ et pharisæi hypocritæ, qui ædificatis sepulchra prophetarum, et ornatis monumenta justorum, | ουαι υμιν γραμματεις και φαρισαιοι υποκριται οτι οικοδομειτε τους ταφους των προφητων και κοσμειτε τα μνημεια των δικαιων |
| 30. | And say: If we had been in the days of our Fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. | et dicitis : Si fuissemus in diebus patrum nostrorum, non essemus socii eorum in sanguine prophetarum ! | και λεγετε ει ημεν εν ταις ημεραις των πατερων ημων ουκ αν ημεν κοινωνοι αυτων εν τω αιματι των προφητων |
| 31. | Wherefore you are witnesses against yourselves, that you are the sons of them that killed the prophets. | itaque testimonio estis vobismetipsis, quia filii estis eorum, qui prophetas occiderunt. | ωστε μαρτυρειτε εαυτοις οτι υιοι εστε των φονευσαντων τους προφητας |
| 32. | Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. | Et vos implete mensuram patrum vestrorum. | και υμεις πληρωσατε το μετρον των πατερων υμων |

27. Woe unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.
28. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.
ORIGEN. As above they are said to be full of extortion and excess, so here they are full of hypocrisy and iniquity, and are likened to dead men’s bones, and all uncleanness.
PSEUDO-CHRYSOSTOM. Justly are the bodies of the righteous said to be temples, because in the body of the righteous the soul has dominion, as God in His temple; or because God Himself dwells in righteous bodies. But the bodies of sinners are called sepulchres of the dead, because the sinner’s soul is dead in his body; for that cannot be deemed to be alive, which does no spiritual or living act.
JEROME. Sepulchres are whitened with lime without, and decorated with marble painted in gold and various colours, but within are full of dead men’s bones. Thus crooked teachers who teach one thing and do another, affect purity in their dress, and humility in their speech, but within are full of all uncleanness, covetousness, and lust.
ORIGEN. For all feigned righteousness is dead, forasmuch as it is not done for God’s sake; yea, rather it is no righteousness at all, any more than a dead man is a man, or an actor who represents any character is the man whom he represents. There is therefore within them so much of bones and uncleanness as are the good things that they wickedly pretend to. And they seem righteous outwardly, not in the eyes of such as the Scripture calls Gods, (Ps. 82:6.) but of such only as die like men.
GREGORY. (Mor. xxvi. 32.) But before their strict Judge they cannot have the plea of ignorance, for by assuming in the eyes of men every form of sanctity, they witness against themselves that they are not ignorant how to live well.
PSEUDO-CHRYSOSTOM. But say, hypocrite, if it be good to be wicked, why do you not desire to seem that which you desire to be? For what it is shameful to seem, that it is more shameful to be; and what to seem is fair, that it is fairer to be. Either therefore be what you seem, or seem what you are.
23:29–31
29. Woe unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,
30. And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.
31. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.
JEROME. By a most subtle syllogism He proves them to be the sons of murderers, while to gain good character and reputation with the people, they build the sepulchres of the Prophets whom their fathers put to death.
ORIGEN. Without just cause He seems to utter denunciations against those who build the sepulchres of the Prophets; for so far what they did was praiseworthy; how then do they deserve this woe?
CHRYSOSTOM. (Hom. lxxiv.) He does not blame them for building the sepulchres, but discovers the design with which they built them; which was not to honour the slain, but to erect to themselves a triumphal monument of the murder, as fearing that in process of time the memory of this their audacious wickedness should perish.
PSEUDO-CHRYSOSTOM. Or, they said within themselves, If we do good to the poor not many see it, and then but for a moment; were it not better to raise buildings which all may see, not only now, but in all time to come? O foolish man, what boots this posthumous memory, if, where you are, you are tortured, and where you are not there you are praised? While He corrects the Jews, He instructs the Christians; for had these things been spoken to the former only, they would have been spoken, but not written; but now they were spoken on their account, and written on ours. When one, besides other good deeds, raises sacred buildings, it is an addition to his good works; but if without any other good works, it is a passion for worldly renown. The martyrs joy not to be honoured with money which has caused the poor to weep. The Jews, moreover, have ever been adorers of saints of former times, and contemners, yea persecutors, of the living. Because they could not endure the reproaches of their own Prophets, they persecuted and killed them; but afterwards the succeeding generation perceived the error of their fathers, and thus in grief at the death of innocent Prophets, they built up monuments of them. But they themselves in like manner persecuted and put to death the Prophets of their own time, when they rebuked them for their sins. This is what is meant, And ye say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the Prophets.
JEROME. Though they speak not this in words, they proclaim it by their actions, in ambitious and magnificent structures to their memory.
PSEUDO-CHRYSOSTOM. What they thought in their hearts, that they spoke by their deeds. Christ lays bare here the natural habit of all wicked men; each readily apprehends the other’s fault, but none his own; for in another’s case each man has an unprejudiced heart, but in his own case it is distorted. Therefore in the cause of others we can all easily be righteous judges. He only is the truly righteous and wise who is able to judge himself. It follows, Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that you are the children of them which killed the Prophets.
CHRYSOSTOM. What kind of accusation is this, to Call one the son of a murderer, who partakes not in his father’s disposition? Clearly there is no guilt in being so; wherefore this must be said in proof of their resemblance in wickedness.
PSEUDO-CHRYSOSTOM. The character of the parents is a witness to the sons; if the father be good and the mother bad, or the reverse, the children may follow sometimes one, sometimes the other. But when both are the same, it very rarely happens that bad sons spring of good parents, or the reverse, though it be so sometimes. This is as a man is sometimes born out of the rule of nature, having six fingers or no eyes.
ORIGEN. And in the prophetic writings, the historical sense is the body, the spiritual meaning is the soul; the sepulchres are the letter and books themselves of Scripture. They then who attend only to the historical meaning, honour the bodies of the Prophets, and set in the letter as in a sepulchre; and are called Pharisees, i. e. ‘cut off,’ as it were cutting off the soul of the Prophets from their body.
23:32–36
32. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.
33. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
34. Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and Scribes; and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:
35. That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
36. Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.
CHRYSOSTOM. He had said against the Scribes and Pharisees, that they were the children of those who killed the Prophets; now therefore He shews that they were like them in wickedness, and that that was false that they said, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the Prophets. Wherefore He now says, Fill ye up the measure of your fathers. This is not a command, but a prophecy of what is to be.
PSEUDO-CHRYSOSTOM. He foretels, that as their fathers killed the Prophets, so they also should kill Christ, and the Apostles, and other holy men. As suppose you had a quarrel with some one, you might say to your adversary, Do to me what you are about to do; but you do not therein bid him do it, but shew him that you are aware of his manæuvres. And in fact they went beyond the measure of their fathers; for they put to death only men, these crucified God. But because He stooped to death of His own free choice, He does not lay on them the sin of His death, but only the death of the Apostles and other holy men. Whence also He said, Fill up, and not Fill over; for a just and merciful Judge overlooks his own wrongs, and only punishes those done to others.
ORIGEN. They fill up the measure of their fathers’ sins by their not believing in Christ. And the cause of their unbelief was, that they looked only to the letter and the body, and would understand nothing spiritual in them.
HILARY. Because then they will fill up the measure of their fathers’ purposes, therefore are they serpents, and an offspring of vipers.
JEROME. The same had been said by John the Baptist. Wherefore as of vipers are born vipers, so of your fathers who were murderers are you born murderers.
PSEUDO-CHRYSOSTOM. He calls them offspring of vipers, because the nature of vipers is such that the young burst the womb of their dam, and so come forth; and in like manner the Jews condemned their fathers, finding fault with their deeds. He says, How shall ye escape the damnation of hell? By building the tombs of the saints? But the first step of piety is to love holiness, the next, to love the saints; for it is not reasonable in him to honour the righteous, who despises righteousness. The saints cannot be friends to those to whom God is an enemy. Shall ye be saved by a mere name, because ye seem to be among God’s people! Forasmuch as an open enemy is better than a false friend, so is he more hateful to God, who calls himself the servant of God, and does the commands of the Devil. Indeed, before God he who has resolved to kill a worm is a murderer before the deed is done, for it is the will that is rewarded for good, or punished for evil. Deeds are evidence of the will. God then does not require deeds on His own account that He may know how to judge, but for the sake of other men, that they may perceive that God is righteous. And God affords the opportunity of sin to the wicked, not to make them sin, but to manifest the sinner; and also to the good He gives opportunity to shew the purpose of their will. In this way then He gave the Scribes and Pharisees opportunity of shewing their purposes, Behold, I send unto you Prophets, and wise men, and Scribes.
HILARY. That is, the Apostles, who, as foretelling things to come, are Prophets; as having knowledge of Christ, are wise men; as understanding the Law, are Scribes.
JEROME. Or, as the Apostle writes to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 12.) that there are various gifts among Christ’s disciples; some Prophets, who foretel things to come; some wise men, who know when they ought to speak; others Scribes taught in the Law; of whom Stephen was stoned, Paul killed, Peter crucified, and the disciples of the Apostles beaten, in the Acts; and they persecuted them from city to city, driving them out of Judæa, that they might go to the Gentiles.
ORIGEN. Or the Scribes who are sent by Christ, are Scribes according to the Gospel, whom the spirit quickens and the letter does not kill, as did the letter of the Law, which whoso followed ran into vain superstitions. The simple words of the Gospel are sufficient for salvation. But the Scribes of the Law do yet scourge the Scribes of the New Testament, by detracting from them in their synagogues; and the heretics also, who are spiritual Pharisees, with their tongues murder the Christians, and persecute them from city to city, sometimes in the body, sometimes also in the spirit, seeking to drive them from their own city of the Law, the Prophets, and the Gospel, into another Gospel.
CHRYSOSTOM. Then to shew them that they should not do this without punishment, He holds out an unspeakable terror over them, That upon you may come all the righteous blood.
RABANUS. That is, all the vengeance due for the shedding of the blood of the righteous.
JEROME. Concerning the Abel here spoken of, there is no doubt that it is he whom his brother Cain murdered. He is proved to have been righteous, not only by this judgment of the Lord, but by the passage in Genesis, which says that his offerings were accepted by God. But we must enquire who is this Zacharias, son of Barachias, because we read of many Zachariases; and that we might not mistake, here it is added, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. Some say that it is that Zacharias who is the eleventh among the twelve Prophets, and his father’s name agrees to this, but when he was slain between the temple and the altar, Scripture does not mention; but above all, in his time there were scarce ‘even the ruins of the temple. Others will have it to be Zacharias the father of John.
ORIGEN. A tradition has come down to us, that there was one place in the temple in which virgins were allowed to worship God, married women being forbidden to stand there. And Mary, after the Saviour’s birth, going into the temple, stood to pray in this place of the virgins. And when they who knew that she had borne a Son were hindering her, Zacharias said, that forasmuch as she was still a virgin, she was worthy of the place of the virgins. Whereupon, as though he manifestly were contravening the Law, he was slain there between the temple and the altar by the men of that generation; and thus this word of Christ is true which He spake to those who were standing there, whom ye slew.a
JEROME. But as this has no Scripture authority, it is as readily despised as offered. Others will have it to be that Zacharias who was killed by Joas, king of Judah, between the temple and the altar, that is, in the court of the temple. (2 Chron. 24:21.) But that Zacharias was not the son of Barachias, but of Jehoiada the Priest. But Barachias in our language is interpreted ‘Blessed of the Lord,’ so that the righteousness of Joiada the Priest is expressed by this Hebrew word. But in the Gospel which the Nazarenes use, we find written ‘son of Joiada’ instead of son of Barachias.
REMIGIUS. It should be enquired too how He says, to the blood of Zacharias, since the blood of many more saints was afterwards shed. This is thus explained. Abel a keeper of sheep was killed in the field, Zacharias a priest was slain in the court of the temple. The Lord therefore names these two, because by these all holy martyrs are denoted, both of lay and priestly order.
CHRYSOSTOM. Moreover, He names Abel, to shew that it would be out of envy that they would kill Christ and His disciples. He names Zacharias, because there was a twofold resemblance in his case, the sacred place, as well as the sacred person.
ORIGEN. Zacharias is interpreted ‘The memory of God.’ Whosoever then hastes to obliterate the memory of God, seems to those to whom he gives offence to shed the blood of Zacharias the son of Barachias. For it is by the blessing of God that we retain the memory of God. Also the memory of God is slain by the wicked, when the Temple of God is polluted by the lustful, and His altar defiled by the carelessness of prayers. Abel is interpreted ‘mourning.’ He then who does not receive that, Blessed are they that mourn, sheds the blood of Abel, that is, puts away the truth of wholesome mourning. Some also shed, as it were, the blood of the Scriptures by putting aside their truth, for all Scripture, if it is not understood according to its truth, is dead.
CHRYSOSTOM. And to take away all excuse from them that they might not say, Because you sent them to the Gentiles thereat were we offended, He foretels that His disciples should be sent to them, and it is of their punishment that He adds, Verily I say unto you, all these things shall come upon this generation.
GLOSS. (ord.) He means not only those there present, but the whole generation before and after, for all were one city and one body of the Devil.
JEROME. The rule of the Scriptures is only to know two generations, one of good the other of bad. Of the generation of the good it is said, The generation of the righteous shall be blessed. (Ps. 112:2.) And of the bad it is said in the present passage, Generation of vipers. These then, because they did against the Apostles like things as Cain and Joas, are described as of one generation.
CHRYSOSTOM. Otherwise; Because He delayed the punishment of hell which He had threatened them with, He pronounces against them threats of present evil, saying, All these things shall come upon this generation.
PSEUDO-CHRYSOSTOM. As all the good things which had been merited by all the saints in each generation since the foundation of the world were bestowed upon that last generation which received Christ; so all the evil that all the wicked in every generation from the foundation of the world had deserved to suffer, came upon that last generation of the Jews which rejected Christ. Or thus; Assail the righteous of former saints, yea, of all the saints, could not merit that so great grace as was given to men in Christ; so the sins of all the wicked could not deserve so much evil as came upon the Jews, that they should suffer such things as these suffered from the Romans, and that in after time every generation of them to the end of the world should be cast off from God, and be made a mock by all the Gentiles. For what is there worse than to reject and in such sort to put to death the Son coming in mercy and lowliness! Or thus; Nations and states when they sin are not thereupon immediately punished by God, but He waits for many generations; but when He sees fit to destroy that state or nation, He then seems to visit upon them the sins of all former generations, and one generation suffers the accumulation of all that former generations have deserved. Thus this generation of the Jews seems to have been punished for their fathers; but in truth they suffered not for others, but on their own account.
CHRYSOSTOM. For he who having seen many sinning yet remains uncorrected, but rather does the same or worse, is obnoxious to heavier punishment.
Catena Aurea Matthew 23

God created us to love, and St Teresa Jornet fulfilled this calling by dedicating her life to caring for abandoned elderly individuals, seeing them not as a burden to society, but as persons made in the image of God and therefore of immense worth, regardless of whether they are productive or not.
By Amy Servais, August 26, 2026 – EWTN Great Britain
When did needing other people become something of which we should be ashamed? We spend much of our lives learning to be independent. A child learns to feed and dress himself, to walk without holding a hand, and eventually to leave home and make his own way in the world. Independence becomes one of the measures by which adulthood is judged. And then, if we are blessed with a long life, something curious happens: the journey begins to reverse. Hands that once buttoned children’s coats may struggle with their own. The person who drove everyone else to appointments may need someone to drive her. A mind which carried names, birthdays, recipes, prayers and the complicated history of an entire family may begin to forget. We become dependent again. For a society increasingly preoccupied with autonomy, this presents a problem; for Christianity, it presents an opportunity to love.
On 26 August, the Church remembers St Teresa of Jesus Jornet Ibars, the Spanish religious sister whose life’s work was devoted to those who had reached precisely this point: the elderly poor, sick and abandoned. And the word abandoned matters.
Born in Aitona, Catalonia, in 1843, Teresa initially trained as a teacher. She knew that she was called to religious life, but discovering the particular form of that vocation took time. She worked alongside the apostolate associated with her great-uncle, Blessed Francisco Palau, and attempted to enter the Poor Clares, but neither path ultimately proved to be hers. Her vocation became clear when she encountered a project initiated by the priest Saturnino López Novoa: a religious community dedicated to caring for poor and abandoned elderly people. Teresa recognised something in that mission. In October 1872, she travelled to Barbastro with her sister María and their friend Mercedes Calzada to join the first small group of women. Teresa was appointed their superior, and on 27 January 1873, the first Sisters received the religious habit. The Little Sisters of the Abandoned Elderly had begun.
There is something almost prophetic in the name—not simply the elderly, not even the poor elderly, but the abandoned elderly. Teresa was responding to a visible social reality in nineteenth-century Spain. To reach old age without money or family could mean destitution; there was no modern welfare state, no comprehensive social-care system, and few protections for someone who could no longer work. But abandonment has many forms. An elderly person today may have a warm room, clean clothes, medication, television and three meals a day and still experience terrible loneliness. We can provide care without companionship, and we can keep someone safe while gradually excluding them from our lives. Perhaps our form of abandonment is sometimes more difficult to recognise precisely because it occurs amid material comfort.
Teresa was not primarily a writer in the manner of St Teresa of Ávila or St John of the Cross. Her spirituality was expressed through action: foundations, journeys, administration and the exhausting practical work of creating communities in which elderly people could be cared for. But she did leave words behind, and among the most revealing are those contained in her spiritual testament to her Sisters: “Care for the elderly with attention and devotion; have great charity towards one another, and faithfully observe the Constitutions.” Then comes the sentence which explains everything: “In this lies your sanctification.”
There is an entire spirituality contained in those few words. For Teresa, holiness was not somewhere else; it was there, in washing, feeding, listening, changing beds, sitting beside someone, repeating an answer, getting up in the night, bearing irritability patiently, and remaining present when another person’s suffering becomes inconvenient. In this lies your sanctification. The elderly person was not an interruption to the Sisters’ religious life; caring for that person was their religious life. Teresa expressed the same conviction in another maxim preserved within the congregation she founded: “Care for the bodies in order to save the souls.” It is a strikingly Catholic sentence. There is no division of the human person into compartments. The body is not something disposable while the soul alone matters, nor is an elderly person merely a body to be medically maintained. Body and soul belong together. A human being needs food and warmth, but also affection; medicine, but also companionship; safety, but also meaning; physical care, but also the knowledge that he remains loved and wanted. The congregation Teresa founded continues to describe its mission in precisely these terms: welcoming vulnerable elderly people “in a family environment”, attending to their material, emotional and spiritual needs—not merely keeping people alive, but helping them to belong.
This brings Teresa remarkably close to one of the great questions facing our own society: what is a human life worth when it can no longer give us anything in return? Modern culture tends to speak about dignity in the language of autonomy. To live with dignity increasingly seems to mean being independent, capable of exercising choice and free from dependence upon others. Christianity proposes something radically different. Human dignity does not disappear when independence does. A person who can no longer work, who cannot remember your name, who needs help washing or eating, who tells you the same story for the sixth time, whose care is expensive, or who is dying—all have dignity. None of this dignity is bestowed upon us by usefulness. It belongs to the human person because we are created by God, loved by Him and called to eternal life.
When Pope Paul VI canonised Teresa in 1974, he recognised precisely this significance in her life. He described the characteristic spirituality of Teresa and her Sisters in just a few words: “To serve, to sacrifice oneself for others.” But he went further, insisting that the Sisters’ vocation stood as a reminder to the world of the sacred dimension of human life. The human person, he insisted, must never be judged merely according to calculations of efficiency, convenience, profitability or utilitarianism. Half a century later, his warning sounds unsettlingly contemporary. We live in a world increasingly adept at calculation. Healthcare, social care and dementia care have costs. Families are stretched. Carers become exhausted. Children move far from their parents. Institutions struggle for staff and resources. These difficulties are real, and Christianity does not require us to pretend otherwise. But there is one calculation we must never make: we must never calculate the value of the person. Because once usefulness becomes the measure of human worth, the weakest will inevitably find themselves on the wrong side of the equation.
Perhaps this is also why old age can teach the young something we desperately need to remember: love is not merely affection; love is often patience. The elderly person interrupts the modern cult of speed and efficiency. He cannot necessarily be hurried. She may need time to stand, time to remember, time to find a word, time to tell a story we have already heard. The modern world frequently experiences these things as inefficiencies. Teresa saw something else: an opportunity for sanctification. Perhaps the inconvenience is even part of the gift. Because when we slow ourselves down for another person, something happens to us as well. We begin to learn that love is not measured by how efficiently we move through life, but by whether we are willing to give our time to another. Teresa’s Sisters did not simply provide services; they gave themselves.
Scripture understood the dignity of old age long before us. In Leviticus we find a command which seems almost startling to modern ears: “You shall rise before the aged, and show deference to the old” (Leviticus 19:32). And in the Book of Job: “Wisdom is with the aged, and understanding in length of days” (Job 12:12). Our culture venerates youth. We disguise ageing; we fight its signs. We speak about the elderly increasingly through the language of demographics: an ageing population, pressure on healthcare, pension costs, social-care burdens. Scripture tells us to stand up when an old person enters the room. The difference between those two visions of old age could hardly be greater: one asks what the elderly cost us; the other asks what we owe them.
Inevitably, this question reaches the end of life. The debate surrounding assisted dying is frequently conducted using the language of compassion, autonomy, choice and dignity. Behind those words are people experiencing real fear, pain and suffering. Christians should never respond to that suffering casually. But Teresa’s life forces us to ask another question: what if the deepest answer to dependence is not greater autonomy, but greater love? What if dignity does not mean ensuring that I never become dependent upon another person? What if allowing someone else to wash me, feed me, comfort me or sit beside my bed is not the destruction of my dignity? What if receiving love is as profoundly human as giving it?
There is a danger when a society begins to associate dignity so closely with autonomy that dependence itself comes to seem undignified. Eventually, the elderly, seriously ill or disabled person may begin to ask a terrible question: “Would everyone be better off without me?” This is where Paul VI’s warning becomes urgent. The human person cannot be measured according to efficiency, convenience, profitability or usefulness—not at the beginning of life, not in its strength, and not at its end. The Christian response to the person who fears becoming a burden cannot simply be an argument; it must be a promise: “You are precious. You belong to us. We will not abandon you.” If Christians are to say those words credibly, we must also live them. If we oppose abandonment at the end of life, we must build families, parishes, hospices, religious communities and institutions in which people genuinely know that they will not be abandoned. Teresa did exactly that. She did not merely argue for the dignity of elderly people; she built houses for them.
By the time Teresa died on 26 August 1897, aged only 54, the congregation had spread rapidly through Spain and beyond. It is an extraordinary legacy for such a short life. But perhaps her greatest legacy remains those simple words left to her Sisters: “Care for the elderly with attention and devotion. In this lies your sanctification.” Perhaps we have made holiness too complicated. Christ had already told us where He could be found: “As you did it to one of the least of these my brethren, you did it to me” (Matthew 25:40). Teresa took Him seriously. Behind the lined face, the failing body, the confused mind and the trembling hands was not an inconvenience; there was Christ.
Her feast therefore leaves us with something more demanding than admiration. It asks something of us: make the telephone call, stay a little longer, listen to the story again, hold the hand, visit the care home, bring an elderly neighbour to Mass, and ask an old person what they remember before deciding that they have nothing left to teach us. Because one day, if God grants us the years, those trembling hands may be ours. We too may forget names, walk slowly, and need someone to help us eat, dress or pray. And perhaps then we will understand what Teresa Jornet understood more than 150 years ago: the final measure of a civilisation is not simply how long it can prolong life, nor how efficiently it can manage decline. It is whether, when we become weak and dependent and can offer the world very little, someone is still willing to look at us and say: “You are precious. You belong to us. We will not abandon you.”

Amy Servais is Studio and Production Manager at EWTN Great Britain, based in Walsingham, where she lives with her family. A video editor by profession, she has a deep love for the Church, evangelisation, and telling beautiful, faith-filled stories. She also writes reflective pieces drawn from her own experiences of faith.


Today’s First Reading
From: 2 Thessalonians 3:6-12, 16-18
Avoiding Idleness. Earning One's Living
----------------------------------------------------
[6] Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away from any brother who is living in idleness and not in accord with the tradition that you received from us. [7] For you yourselves know how you ought to imitate us; we were not idle when we were with you, [8] we did not eat any one's bread without paying, but with toil and labor we worked night and day, that might not burden any of you. [9] It was not because we have not that right, but to give you in our conduct an example to imitate. [10] For even when we were with you, we gave you this command: If any one will not work, let him not eat. [11] For we hear that some of you are living in idleness, mere busy bodies, not doing any work. [12] Now such persons we command and exhort in the Lord Jesus Christ to do their work in quietness and to earn their own living.
Prayer and Farewell Wishes
---------------------------------
[16] Now may the Lord of peace himself give you peace at all times in all ways. The Lord be with you all.
***********************************************************************
Commentary:
6. St. Paul wants to prevent the misconduct of some Christians spreading to others; and at the same time he wants to help the transgressors to turn back--which they may do if they are made to feel isolated. Excessive tolerance of irregular behavior does nothing to encourage reform and only helps the spread of permissiveness.
That was the Apostle's usual policy: "I wrote to you in my letter not to associate with immoral men; not at all meaning the immoral of this world, or the greedy and robbers, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. But rather I wrote to you not to associate with any one who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or robber" (1 Cor 5:10-11).
7-12. Some of the Thessalonians, wrongly thinking that the Parousia was about to happen, had given up working and were living in idleness, minding everyone's business but their own. So the Apostle reminds them all that when he was among them he worked to keep himself and was a burden on no one.
The Second Vatican Council underlines the value of work when it exhorts "Christians, as citizens of both cities, to perform their duties faithfully in the spirit of the Gospel." Far from neglecting earthly responsibilities, they should, as the Council goes on, realize that by their faith they "are bound all the more to fulfill these responsibilities according to the vocation of each one (cf. 2 Thess 3:6-13; Eph 4:28)" ("Gaudium Et Spes", 43).
"For the love of God, for the love of souls, and to live up to our Christian vocation, we must give good example. So as not to give scandal, or to provoke even the faintest suspicion that the children of God are soft and useless, so as not to disedify..., you must strive to show an example of balanced justice, to behave properly as responsible people. The farmer who ploughs his field while constantly raising his heart to God, just as much as the carpenter, the blacksmith, the office worker, the academic--all Christians in fact--have to be an example for their colleagues at work, and to be humble about it. Therefore, everyone, in his job, in whatever place he has in society, must feel obliged to make his work God's work, sowing everywhere the peace and joy of the Lord" (St. J. Escriva, "Friends of God", 70).
16. "The Lord of peace", or "the God of peace", is a title found in a number of St. Paul's letters (cf. Rom 15:33; 2 Cor 13:11; Phil 4:9; 1 Thess 5;23), because Redemption, by wiping out sin, establishes people's friendship with God and with one another. The wish expressed by the Apostle here echoes the greeting Christians normal used with one another, a greeting our Lord himself recommended: "Whatever house you enter, first say, 'Peace be to this house' (Lk 10:5). The Jews used and continue to use the same greeting--"Shalom" (=peace). When a Christian greets someone in this way it should be a sincere expression of his love of God and love of others and not just mere polite well-wishing, hoping people will "enjoy themselves".
Referring to empty, selfish peace of that sort, our Lord said that he had come to bring not peace but a sword (cf. Mt 10:34). He also warned us that the peace he gives is not peace of the type the world gives (cf. Jn 14:27), but a peace which comes from the Holy Spirit (cf. Gal 5:22) and which "passes all understanding" (Phil 4:7). "It is useless to call for exterior calm if there is no calm in men's consciences, in the center of their souls" (St. J. Escriva, "Christ Is Passing By", 73).
We should therefore always be "eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace" (Eph 4;3). If we are, we will be builders of peace and will receive the reward Christ promised when he proclaimed, "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God" (Mt 5:9). In this connection John Paul II has said, "Peace is work we have to do; it calls for commitment and solidarity with one another. But it is also (inseparably and above all) something in God's gift: we need to pray for it" ("Address", 8 December 1978).
From: Matthew 23:27-36
Jesus Indicts the Scribes and Pharisees (Continuation)
------------------------------------------------------------------
(Jesus said to the scribes and Pharisees,) [27] "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you are like white-washed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within they are full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness. [28] So you also outwardly appear righteous to men, but within you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.
[29] "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you build the tombs of the prophets and adorn the monuments of the righteous, [30] saying, `If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.' [31] Thus you witness against yourselves, that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets. [32] Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers." [33] You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?
***********************************************************************
Commentary:
27-28. The Jews used to whitewash tombs annually, shortly before the feast of the Passover. The whitewash made the tombs more visible and helped to avoid people brushing against them, which would have meant incurring legal uncleanness for seven days (Numbers 19:16; Luke 11:44).
In the sunlight, these tombs sparkled radiantly white, but inside they held corruption.
29-32. Our Lord shows them that they are cut off from the same cloth as their ancestors--not because they erect mausoleums in honor of prophets and just men but because they are guilty of the same sin as those who killed the prophets. Hence their hypocrisy, which makes them even worse than their fathers. With pained irony Jesus tells them that they are compounding the sins of their ancestors.
Clearly this is referring to His passion and death: if the ancients killed the prophets, by causing Him to suffer and die our Lord's contemporaries will still be more cruel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.