Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/15/2026 3:14:03 PM PDT by ebb tide
You might remember yours truly writing this less than one year ago.
As time goes by, it seems that Leo keeps finding himself in strange “situations”.
Take this one here: the resignation of a Bishop accused of homosexual behaviour.
If you read the full text, you discover the following:
a) The two had worked together for a long time, and were both occupied in various roles in the Peruvian Episcopal Conference. I dare to say you get to know people with which you work for years. I also dare to say that, if you are a colleague of a person who is a homo, you will likely get hints and rumours, and you will likely spot mannerisms and strange ways.
b) When Prevost was moved to Rome to persecute orthodox bishop on behalf of the Evil Clown, the two kept appearing together, showing a connection that went beyond the merely professional.
c) After Prevost went to Rome to persecute orthodox bishops, his office received the whistleblowing about his pal in November 2024, and there is no trace of any action being taken then or later whilst he was in that office.
d) Only after Infovaticana made the matter public in April 2026, around one and a half year after the original whistleblowing, things started moving and the Bishop has now been made to resign. The linked article has more sordid details.
e) This is the same Leo who has now just made bishop a guy who claimed that sodomy is not sinful.
Connect the dots. Put all the circumstances together. Examine them in the light of the prudence of a sensible, rational person; one who does not indulge in rash judgment, but also refuse to be blind to the reality he has in front of himself. What does all this tell you?
It tells me that Leo is, at the very least, a hostage of the homo mafia, which he continues to protect; and, at worse, a card-carrying, T-shirt wearing member of that same mafia. One who participates in cover-ups of clergy denounced for homosexual behaviour, and openly promotes (the new bishop) and supports (think of James “Georgina” Martin) clergy who clearly promote homosexuality and sodomy.
Once again: it’s not difficult. It’s in front of our eyes. It’s public information. How many times, when a priest or a bishop have been exposed, have you heard people remembering details, encounters, events, which they had discounted, or had refused to judge appropriately, perhaps out of fear of being “too harsh”? The details, the encounters, and the events are accumulating here.
Connect the dots.
Being a Catholic does not mean being blind, deaf, and dumb.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
He’s definitely a commie and commies love using sexual deviants as their useful idiots and brownshirts.
The two churches I attend are fairly conservative. We do our readings from the Gospe. Our priest gives homilies based on those readings sans-politics, and bless our soldiers and first responders, but the pope is never mentioned at all.
Dropped an ‘L’ in there.
Leo’s doctrinal errors and his appointments are backfiring. The bishops are expanding access to Latin rite Masses, for example, because the people want them. The Holy Spirit may be using Leo to provoke corrective reform.
That it a good description of my church as well. Of course it's LCMS, but some heresies are more equal than others.
“worked together for a long time”
And played together?
I was briefly acquainted with Bernard Law in Boston and several of his inner circle - beginning in 1984 (that’s 40+ years ago). I was involved in part because of my expertise in HIV/AIDS medicine at a time when very few doctors were working in that field.
I would observe that, even then, it would have been impossible for any prelate in a leadership position in Boston - hospital, parish, school, college, or Archdiocese - to not have at least made his peace with ignoring open homosexuality among some ordained men.
Not to defend BCL but I (raised Dutch reformed tradition) witnessed hundreds of hospital workers (cooks, cleaners, nurses aides, maintenance guys, etc) stand in a long line and wait hours on an asphalt parking lot in 90+ degree heat to touch the Cardinal’s hand when he was visiting Catholic facilities after he took over.
Once the whole Boston story went down, I thought to myself, WHAT EXACTLY WAS HE SUPPOSED TO DO? All those people - hardworking, ordinary people, without whom Catholic schools, hospitals, and parishes would collapse - their faith was tied up somehow with this Cardinal guy, and if he spilled the beans, their faith, at least for a lot of them, would go -poof.
That was a heavy responsibility for him and his inner circle to carry.
,,, the soap opera continues.
As we discussed yesterday, ebby your “anonymous” author is probably the looniest loon of your cartoon networks of fools that you so frequently post - and you know some loons, ebby (for instance, fired strickland.)
Here is nutjob’s solution to the sspx self-inflicted excommunications:
It does not need a genius to understand that, following TC and the thuggish attitude of Francis and his Evil Minions (talking to you, Cardinal Roche) a number, perhaps dozen, perhaps hundreds of priests will ask the SSPX to be allowed in.
It is, of course, important that both the risk of infiltration and the risk of watering down are avoided. I remind you here that the FSSP was created exactly in order to suffocate the SSPX and make it die.
In my eyes, the solution to this is what I would call the Society Of Blessed Pius IX.
This Society should be 100% controlled by the SSPX, which would own all real estate, cash, investments, trademarks etc. and would have disciplinary power over the members of the SSPIX. This would take care of the issues above. Every sincere priest would find the change resembling paradise after dealing with his V II Bishop. imagine, homilies where you don’t have to carefully balance every word, and are allowed to say that people actually go to hell in huge numbers…
The SSPIX would start a big donations drive, which would, unavoidably, be wildly successful. This would lead to the establishment, in just a few years, of hundreds of new chapels to which the Vatican would have no TLM to oppose, because the old traditionalist orders have been castrated par ordre du mufti . These chapels would be a thorn in the side of the Francisthugs all over the West.
Even you can do better than this freak, ebby. ImagineThat!
Another gay commie “pope-dude”.
I miss Benedict!
In your wild rage and rantings of lies, you don’t even realize who you are posting to. Talking about loons!
It was the truth and you’re the one posting this stuff. Don’t care who you are. Weirdo.
My post was directed to oystir, only. I was just courtesy pinging you.
I’m not ebby.
Gotcha.
Oystir still confuses Bishop Strickland with Bishop Schneider. He’s a very confused, wound-up modernist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.