Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abp. Gänswein: Benedict XVI felt ‘sorrow in his heart’ over Francis’ Latin Mass crackdown
LifeSite News ^ | July 9, 2026 | Gaetano Masciullo

Posted on 07/09/2026 8:34:16 AM PDT by ebb tide

Abp. Gänswein: Benedict XVI felt ‘sorrow in his heart’ over Francis’ Latin Mass crackdown

Archbishop Georg Gänswein has said Pope Benedict XVI felt ‘sorrow’ when Pope Francis curtailed Summorum Pontificum, his 2007 motu proprio expanding the Traditional Latin Mass.

Pope Benedict XVI was deeply saddened after learning that the broad permission he granted for the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) had been significantly restricted by Pope Francis, former aide Archbishop Georg Gänswein has revealed.

On July 7, Italian newspaper Il Giornale published an exclusive interview with Gänswein on the occasion of the 19th anniversary of Summorum Pontificum, Pope Benedict XVI’s motu proprio that expanded access to the TLM. Gänswein said the late pontiff regarded the measure as a means of restoring peace in the Church’s liturgical life and was personally distressed when its provisions were later curtailed by Pope Francis’ 2021 motu proprio, Traditionis Custodes.

“When I read Traditionis Custodes to him, I saw that there was sorrow in his heart. That was my impression,” Gänswein said, recalling Benedict XVI’s reaction after the publication of the document that imposed new restrictions on celebrations according to the pre-conciliar Roman Missal.

Gänswein, who now serves as apostolic nuncio to the Baltic States and was Benedict XVI’s longtime personal secretary, said the late Pope introduced Summorum Pontificum to restore what he considered the rightful place of the older Roman Rite within the Church. According to Gänswein, Benedict believed the rite “had never been abolished” and wanted to give it “full recognition” while “promoting peace in the Church’s liturgical life.”

READ: ‘This is a canonical mess’: Fr. Murray explains why SSPX priests, laity are not excommunicated

Asked about the resistance that accompanied the document’s publication in 2007, Gänswein said Benedict “was accustomed to receive criticism, but when he was convinced that something was right, he pressed on toward his goal and simply took note of it.”

The archbishop also addressed the relationship between Summorum Pontificum and the Society of St. Pius X. “For him, who had witnessed up close the agreement that Lefebvre reneged on in 1988, the schism was a personal suffering. He said it would have consequences not just for a few days, but would be a wound to the unity of the Church destined to endure.”

Nevertheless, Gänswein said Summorum Pontificum was “not conceived primarily in that perspective, but rather aimed at the internal life of the Church. In his experience as prefect, he had already seen that there were unsatisfactory aspects in the application of Ecclesia Dei, and therefore something had to be done.”

Reflecting on the years that followed the document’s publication, Gänswein said Benedict believed the initiative had begun to bear fruit, “particularly among younger Catholics.” He described the motu proprio as “a beginning” and he believed that “it could lead to integration by removing the existing split within the liturgy.”

“He was convinced that such a rite, celebrated for so many centuries, could not fail to be revived,” Gänswein added. “He was also pleased with the work of the former Ecclesia Dei institutes, which offer an alternative for those who would otherwise go to – or remain within – the Society of Saint Pius X."

READ: Priest attends brother’s homosexual ‘wedding,’ calls it ‘amazing,’ ‘special’

Gänswein also pointed to the annual Paris-to-Chartres pilgrimage as evidence of growing participation by younger Catholics attached to the Traditional liturgy. “These young people are nourished by the beauty of the liturgy; they are not at all opposed to the Second Vatican Council. It is not true that those who have a Traditional liturgical sensibility and attend Tridentine Masses are anti‑conciliar – anyone who claims this is driven solely by ideology.”

Asked whether restrictions introduced by Traditionis Custodes should be removed, Gänswein expressed support for such a step. He said he hoped for a decision that would eliminate the existing prohibitions, describing the present moment as a kairos, i.e., an appropriate time, to move beyond the measures introduced in 2021, “to remove those prohibitions and overcome the incident represented by that text.”


TOPICS: Catholic; History; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: dictatorpope; frankenchurch; tyrantpope

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


1 posted on 07/09/2026 8:34:16 AM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; kalee; markomalley; miele man; Mrs. Don-o; ...

Ping


2 posted on 07/09/2026 8:34:44 AM PDT by ebb tide (Our Lady, Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix of All Graces pray for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I believe its not just about one man - Benedict XVI, Francis or even Leo

The modernization/liberalization/self-castration trend of the Church is a critical and primary aspect of post-modernism and global marxism and its masters for the last 75 years.

Specific parts of this larger plan, like the Obama Admin’s removal of Benedict XVI, continue apace. Leo seems to be another controlled figure in this long-running scheme.


3 posted on 07/09/2026 8:42:11 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

It seems like the current leaders really worship the Second Vatican Council. Not sure why. The 60’s were a turbulent time.


4 posted on 07/09/2026 8:44:39 AM PDT by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Obama’s removal of Benedict?


5 posted on 07/09/2026 9:08:32 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Remember, when Francis first became pope, there was no move against the TLM. In fact, everything we read suggested that wasn’t even an issue he cared about, he was pressured by German cardinals. Then we surprised and hurt by the backlash.


6 posted on 07/09/2026 9:10:39 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

glad to see Abp Ganswein consulted. had hoped he would have been brought in “from the cold” by now. but Leo is of the Francis strain. i feel Pope Benedict carved out the right solution - and no one knew him better than his right-hand man.


7 posted on 07/09/2026 9:16:00 AM PDT by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Benedict let us down so badly, even knowing the harm it would do. I’m not feeling much sympathy.


8 posted on 07/09/2026 10:00:12 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I am a confused Catholic at this point. Rome says that the latin Mass is not acceptable, yet all of the documents that come out of Rome are written predominantly in Latin.


9 posted on 07/09/2026 11:43:20 AM PDT by pghkevin (Where have the principles of the founding fathers gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson