Pope Leo XIV receives Sarah Mullally, the first female Anglican archbishop of Canterbury, in the library of the apostolic palace, April 27, 2026 (Photo: Vatican Media)
Posted on 04/28/2026 9:19:56 AM PDT by ebb tide
Pope Leo XIV receives Sarah Mullally, the first female Anglican archbishop of Canterbury, in the library of the apostolic palace, April 27, 2026 (Photo: Vatican Media)
The word “scandal” comes from the Greek skándalon, via the Latin scandalum, meaning a “stumbling block” — something that causes another to fall, especially in matters of faith and morals.
It was a term Pope Leo XIV returned to several times on Monday in his address to Sarah Mullally, the first female Anglican archbishop of Canterbury, during her four-day visit to Rome.
Disunity among Christians, he said, is one such stumbling block to proclaiming the Gospel. It would also be a scandal, he added, if Christians failed to continue working towards overcoming their divisions, however intractable they are.
All true. But there is another kind of scandal, arguably more serious in the quest for Christian unity: portraying something as true that is evidently not, and trumpeting it from the rooftops.
Mullally, like all her Anglican predecessors, does not possess valid orders. She leads a community separated from Rome that has drifted further from Catholic teaching, particularly over the past sixty years since the historic meeting of Paul VI and her predecessor Michael Ramsey. Her recent appointment as the first female archbishop of Canterbury only reinforces the judgment of Leo XIII in Apostolicae Curae (1896), which declared Anglican orders “absolutely null and utterly void.”
Yet throughout her visit, Rome received Mullally — who has described herself in the past as “pro-choice rather than pro-life” and supports blessings for same-sex couples — with an enthusiasm that conveyed precisely the opposite impression. From the moment she arrived, Vatican officials rolled out the red carpet, extending courtesies that went well beyond diplomatic hospitality and included gestures laden with ecclesial significance.
Archbishop Flavio Pace, Secretary of the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity, permitted Mullally to give a blessing in the Clementine Chapel in St. Peter’s Basilica – the very site of St. Peter’s martyrdom and so a place where apostolic succession is visually and spiritually concentrated. It was the first time a visiting archbishop of Canterbury has been given such a privilege, and Archbishop Pace bowed to receive her blessing.
She was welcomed at the major Roman basilicas, granted a private audience with Pope Leo XIV, for which the Vatican was quick to distribute photographs, and led a public “moment of prayer” with the Pope in the Chapel of Urban VIII in the apostolic palace, joined by Cardinal Kurt Koch, prefect of the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity, and Archbishop Richard Moth of Westminster.
Strikingly, she became the first archbishop of Canterbury to officiate an Anglican liturgy in the church of St Ignatius of Loyola in Campo Marzio, a prominent Jesuit church where Sts. Aloysius Gonzaga and Robert Bellarmine are buried. Although the Church of England has its own church in Rome — the Church of All Saints near Piazza del Popolo — she also formally installed her representative to the Holy See during the service. Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle preached at the Anglican liturgy.
In his address to Sarah Mullally earlier on Monday, Pope Leo had recalled his own episcopal motto, In Illo uno unum — in Christ, we are one — and quoted Pope Francis who said it would “be a scandal if, due to our divisions, we did not fulfil our common vocation to make Christ known.”
But can there ever be authentic ecclesial unity with a communion that lacks valid orders and promotes moral teachings at odds with Catholic doctrine, including women’s ordination?
Moreover, what service is Rome rendering to Anglicans by publicly feting their first woman leader while omitting to charitably issue some kind of fraternal correction? Meetings, joint prayers (also in the Sistine Chapel last year with King Charles III, the Supreme Governor of the Church of England), blessings, and liturgical gestures — these all abound, but never is there any call to doctrinal conversion or repentance for the schism.
This contrasts with Vatican statements twenty years ago, when the Church of England was contemplating ordaining women as bishops. Cardinal Walter Kasper, then Cardinal Koch’s predecessor, treated the issue with the utmost seriousness. Not known for his orthodoxy, even he was emphatic that such a step would effectively rupture the shared understanding of apostolic tradition and render full communion “unreachable,” since the Catholic Church holds that the episcopate can only be conferred on men.
And yet, when the Church of England later ignored those warnings and approved the ordination of women as bishops, Rome expressed regret but continued dialogue without any evident shift in approach.
That response, absent of any meaningful fraternal correction, has continued, leaving a mood music that conveys major developments such as ordaining women as bishops as being of little consequence to Rome, or at least not decisive obstacles on the road to unity. The cumulative effect has been to elevate symbolic closeness above doctrinal clarity — an impression that has likely only encouraged the Church of England to continue along its present course.
By publicly treating Sarah Mullally as a valid archbishop — allowing her to lead prayers with the Pope, bless a real archbishop in the Clementine Chapel, and officiate Anglican vespers in a historic Roman Church — the Vatican is serving to affirm her in her ecclesial “trans” identity and error.
But if unity is to be real, it must be grounded in truth. Without that foundation, even the most gracious encounters risk becoming, in the end, the very stumbling blocks Pope Leo warns against, rather than steps toward communion.
Cardinal Koch was contacted for comment on Mullally’s visit but he had not responded by press time.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Ping
Isn’t that Austin Powers, International Man of Mystery?
That proves that the Catholic Church no onger honors the teachings of the Bible, for me.
Holy Hocus Pocus, Batman.
I’m OK women pastors. I’m OK with women priests. There are much bigger issues in the fight for faith. I personally don’t think God cares about such things - but I respect the opinions of those who do.
That said, this is not about a woman in an ecclesiastical leadership position. This is about the virtue signaling by this pope who doesn’t realize that his secularization is not as important as his spirituality. I’m done with the Vatican.
The human element of Holy Mother Church is evidently error prone.
I’m not a Catholic so Jimi Crack Korn
Back when I was a Catholic, so was the Pope.
Does the Pope as Bishop of Rome recognize her as a valid archbishop?
Or does he (as the head of state of the Vatican) greet her as a foreign dignitary (as he did for example with Angela Merkel etc)?
I do have an issue with the apparent definition of “Christian unity”: reading between the lines here, it looks like the writer’s definition is “everybody becomes a Roman Catholic”, which is (I say advisedly) much like Islam being a “religion of peace” presupposes that that will happen when everybody converts, submits or dies.
Kill those SSPX Crastards!!!
lol
Holy Mother Church is not like Islam in this regard, j.
She is, however, the One True Faith.
But the human element is definately prone to error, so that could be the valid response. 😁🤙
To echo Mr. Monk (the TV detective show); "but I don't think so." 😁🤙
A lyric in the show's theme song; I could be wrong, but I don't think so. 😁🤙
Error is broader than inadvertently making a mistake, in terms of how the Church uses the word.
Anyone who campaigns against the truth is in error. So that includes the “on purpose” crowd.
Momback, DC!
We need ya.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.