Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Catholic Caucus] Chinese bishops side with communist regime to restrict worship, ban ‘unregistered clergy’
LifeSite News ^ | February 13, 2026 | Andreas Wailzer

Posted on 02/13/2026 8:43:31 AM PST by ebb tide

[Catholic Caucus] Chinese bishops side with communist regime to restrict worship, ‘unregistered clergy’

The government-sanctioned bishops in China have backed limits on public worship introduced by the communist regime, supporting a ban on clergy who refuse state registration.

The government-approved Chinese Catholic bishops have backed the Communist Party’s limitation on public worship.

EWTN reports that the Bishops’ Conference of the Catholic Church in China (BCCC), sanctioned by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), supported the government’s ban on “unregistered clergy” engaging in religious pastoral work or doing so in “unapproved sites for worship.”

In a February 4 statement, the BCCC stated that “religious groups must comply with relevant laws and regulations when conducting religious activities.”

Compliance with these rules is a matter of “national and public interest,” according to the bishops.

The CCP introduced legislation limiting religious activities to “registered” religious venues by “certified and registered religious personnel.”

Nina Shea, who directs the Center for Religious Freedom, called on Pope Leo XIV to summon the bishops from the BCCC to the Vatican for their support of the “suppression of Chinese Catholicism.”

“That the heads of these entities are the bishops of Beijing and Shanghai, China’s most important dioceses, is shameful,” she said. “Pope Leo should immediately summon them to Rome to review their episcopal authority.”

“Supporting the CCP ban on unregistered clergy and churches directly conflicts with Vatican policy,” Shea stressed.

She said Leo “should disclose the content of the Holy See’s provisional agreement with China and review whether this new Chinese policy constitutes a breach of the agreement’s terms or even of its spirit.”

The officially secret Vatican-China deal, signed in 2018 under Pope Francis, is believed to recognize the state-approved church in China and allows the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to appoint bishops. The Pope apparently maintains veto power, although in practice it is the CCP that has control. It also allegedly allows for the removal of legitimate bishops to be replaced by CCP-approved bishops.

The deal was renewed most recently in 2024 for a four-year period.

READ: China consecrates bishop approved by Pope Leo XIV under Vatican-China deal

Shea referenced a 2007 letter from Pope Benedict XVI to the Catholic Church in China in which he said that the attempt by the CCP to impose its own structure on the Chinese Church was “incompatible with Catholic doctrine.”

She also cited the Vatican’s 2019 pastoral guidelines to members of the Chinese Catholic Church that affirmed that priests and bishops had the right to “individually follow one’s conscience on whether to refuse to take the pledge renouncing foreign influence, such as papal influence – a pledge required to register with the state’s Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association and its bishops’ conference.”

“This new position in support of banning and criminalizing those clergy who refuse to take the pledge renouncing papal authority lays bare these entities as mere party tools for communist control and suppression of Chinese Catholicism,” Shea warned.


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: chicoms; hypocrisy; illicitbishops; vatican

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

“That the heads of these entities are the bishops of Beijing and Shanghai, China’s most important dioceses, is shameful,” she said. “Pope Leo should immediately summon them to Rome to review their episcopal authority.”

Meanwhile, back at the ranch:

Cardinal Fernández tells SSPX superior that Vatican II documents ‘cannot be corrected’

Moreover, a communique released after Thursday’s meeting revealed that Fernández threatened Pagliarani and the SSPX with the crime of “schism” if the episcopal consecrations announced by the Society go ahead.

The word "schism" seems to used arbitrarily in the Synodal "church".

1 posted on 02/13/2026 8:43:31 AM PST by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; kalee; markomalley; miele man; Mrs. Don-o; ...

Ping


2 posted on 02/13/2026 8:44:00 AM PST by ebb tide (Francis' sin-nodal "church" is not the Catholic Church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Philippe Cardinal Pétain agrees with this action.


3 posted on 02/13/2026 8:46:40 AM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

“The officially secret Vatican-China deal, signed in 2018 under Pope Francis, is believed to recognize the state-approved church in China and allows the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to appoint bishops.” So Padre Francis was a Chinese Communist?


5 posted on 02/13/2026 9:06:11 AM PST by kawhill (Dywedwch Wrthym + Add translation Welsh-English dictionary 'Tell Us')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kawhill

Well, the bishop had a choice, either go to gulag or made this statement.
Looks like, he decided to stay and work rather than selecting martyrdom.

It is hard choice, but people safe in the USA mostly do not understand what’s going on.


6 posted on 02/13/2026 9:17:00 AM PST by AZJeep (sane )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kawhill

It was one of his most shameful acts.


7 posted on 02/13/2026 9:25:14 AM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson