Posted on 11/06/2025 4:33:24 PM PST by ebb tide
by Professor Massimo Viglione*
1) Mary Most Holy
2) The Eucharist
3) The Most Holy Trinity
These three elements, in fact, are absolutely and inveterately, unreconcilable with interreligious “dialogue” and principally, with its main goal, i.e. the creation of a Gnostic, globalist, egalitarian, worldwide “universal religion.”
Of the three essential elements, conceivably only the first - the Blessed Virgin - can be somewhat trans-naturalized with the pagan female divinity (see Pachamama – and the scandalous, infamous, unforgivable, cultic veneration given to her in the Vatican by shameless traitors).
All dialogue, otherwise, with the Protestant, Jewish, Islamic and Globalists in general, becomes useless.
And for sure, the second and third elements do not allow for any adaptation whatever: that Christ sacrificed for us in His Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity under the species of bread and wine is irreducible.
And even more irreducible are the Second and Third Persons of The Most Holy Trinity: the ultimate obstacle to any form of "dialogue," especially with Judaism and Islam.
It's not worth it then to be surprised by the war against Mary Most Holy; "the girl next door," of Post-Conciliar and Bergoglian memory, for she is neither Mediatrix of all Graces nor Co-Redemptrix, nor anything else. This war will continue until they manage to present Her as Pachamama or Gaia, mother of all men in accordance with the Bergoglian religion of Abu Dhabi. Which has nothing at all to do with Catholicism.
And sooner or later they will try to distort Faith in the Eucharist and in the Trinity.
Sixty years after the Second Vatican Council, who, today, confronted with these sixty years of unrelenting and increasingly devastating apostasies and heresies of every kind, (even after Bergoglio and now with the current hyper-ecologist and pro-sodomite Vatican hierarchy) has not realized what the Vatican II and Conciliar Church are? [The situation] can no longer be justified or understood.
Even less so (can it be justified) by those who do understand but have sold themselves to the power of the Revolution for a plate of lentils.
But make no mistake: it will only get worse until God intervenes.
There is no sense in making woeful melodrama about the risk of sedevacantism, as if this were the major problem facing the Church today and not simply a dangerous consequence of the systematic deconstruction of Faith and Morality.
The devastation of the Mystical Body of Christ will continue inexorably as long as The Head allows it. It will end when He decides; in whatever way He sees fit.
In the meantime, we can do three things:
1) Pray to God for His speedy intervention.
2) Offer to God all the pain and holy wrath we endure (for those who have the grace and received these from Heaven): because pain and wrath for the evil in the Church are Divine graces,
3) Testify to the One Immutable Truth of all time.
The rest is treachery and complicity. Both on the part of those who perpetrate the [destruction] and those who follow it.
May Our Lady, Mary, Most Holy, Co-Redemptrix, guide and enlighten us every day and come in haste to the aid of the Church, by rescuing Her from unfaithful men and their accomplices scattered the world over. Also, and most of all, among the "good."
Massimo Viglione - Professor, Historian, and Essayist, currently:
• a tenured researcher at the National Research Council (CNR) at the Institute of the History of Mediterranean Europe.
• an adjunct professor of History of International Politics at the SSML/San Domenico University Institute in Rome.
Sixty years after the Second Vatican Council, who, today, confronted with these sixty years of unrelenting and increasingly devastating apostasies and heresies of every kind, (even after Bergoglio and now with the current hyper-ecologist and pro-sodomite Vatican hierarchy) has not realized what the Vatican II and Conciliar Church are? [The situation] can no longer be justified or understood.
Ping
Since the covid, when the Church denied us the Eucharist, I don't trust the church. Satin's grasp on the “bishops” is tight...
"See how the prots always gang up to attack Mary as the Mother of Jesus Christ, the Son of God?"
The first part is a typical Ebb Tide tactic: He starts with a FALSE ACCUSATION "See how...gang up to attack Mary..."
In the later part of his (ebb tide) post, we find his change of mind regarding Mary's identity...
(With "Thanks!" to Ken Regis for first identifying Ebb Tide's significant shift away from long-held and flawed RCC doctrine- embedded in their very own "Hail! Mary" prayer with its "empty phrases" - used both as penance for sins [as if the payment was not already made] ... or driven by the many repetitious beads -- as a fruitless ritual -- murmured into the wind.)
To demonstrate Ebb Tide's shift away from RCC doctrine and toward the truth of the identity of Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ, here is a grammatical breakdown of Ebb Tide's statement (where he reassesses his long-held, false identification that Mary is the "Mother of God"
_____________________
[Main Clause]
Subject: (You) (implied)
Predicate: See
Direct Object (Noun Clause): how the prots always gang up to attack Mary as the Mother of Jesus Christ, the Son of God?
[Noun Clause breakdown]
Subordinating conjunction: how
Subject: the prots
Adverb (frequency): always
Predicate: gang up
Infinitive phrase (purpose): to attack Mary
Object of Infinitive: Mary
Appositive (explaining Mary): as the Mother of Jesus Christ, the Son of God
[Appositive phrase breakdown]
Preposition: as
Object: the Mother
Prepositional phrase modifying “Mother”: of Jesus Christ
Appositive modifying “Jesus Christ”: the Son of God
.
_______________
Despite damning evidence to the contrary, in response, Ebb Tide writes the following:
Despite all the lies, I have repeatedly declared that Mary is the Mother of God.
I have never said she is not.
With all of this laid out and clearly demonstrated, you should decide if the response from Ebb Tide is TRUE or FALSE.
In fairness, Ebb Tide could have retracted his declaration that Mary is the "Mother" (sic) of Jesus Christ who is the Son of God but as yet, he (Ebb Tide) has not. He has been notified of his apparent shift away from his oft-repeated, unbiblical position but as of yet he has not recanted.
Furthermore, Jesus Himself issued a mild rebuke to a woman who cried out to Him, "Blessed is the mother who gave you birth and nursed you" (Luke 11:27), replying to her, "Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and obey it." By doing so, He curtailed any tendency to elevate Mary as an object of worship. He could certainly have said, “Yes, blessed be the Queen of Heaven!” But He did not. He was affirming the same truth that the Bible affirms—there is no queen of heaven, and the only biblical references to the “queen of heaven” refer to the goddess of an idolatrous, false religion.
Watch how he responds!
Prots aren't the ones posting all the Mary threads going outside Scripture by touting her as something she isn't.
Pointing out the Catholic errors is not *ganging up to attack Mary.*
The Holy Spirit saw fit to identify her as *mother of Jesus*. Catholics think what the Holy Spirit choose to use isn't good enough so they assigned a new identifier to her.
It is the height of arrogance to think to improve on the work of God when He inspired Scripture, all their rationalization for such action aside. There's simply no justification in the world for telling people God dropped the ball when He gave us His God breathed, Holy Spirit inspired word.
the Holy Spirit wrote all of Luke 1:
Elizabeth says:
“Mother of my Lord” (Luke 1:43)
Greek: ἡ μήτηρ τοῦ κυρίου μου
The same Greek word κύριος replaces the sacred Name YHWH 6,500+ times
Every Jew in the room heard “Mother of Yahweh.”
Jesus is 100 % God
- John 1:1 “the Word was God”
- John 20:28 Thomas: “My Lord and my God”
Mary is a created being and the bearer i.e. mother (mother is NOT creator) of the whole Person, not a half-person.
- She didn’t give birth to a human nature and then Jesus “took on” the divine one.
All of a sudden you’re an expert in knowing what Jews heard back in the day. Considering the errors you constantly make in handling the word this take is rejected.
More filler.
(Luke 1:39-45 ESV)
In those days Mary arose and went with haste into the hill country, to a town in Judah, and she entered the house of Zechariah and greeted Elizabeth. And when Elizabeth heard the greeting of Mary, the baby leaped in her womb. And Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit, and she exclaimed with a loud cry, “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb! And why is this granted to me that the mother of my Lord should come to me? For behold, when the sound of your greeting came to my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy. And blessed is she who believed that there would be a fulfillment of what was spoken to her from the Lord.”
.
("Suddenly an Expert" version)
In those days Mary arose and went with haste into the hill country, to a town in Judah, and she entered the house of Zechariah and greeted Elizabeth and other Jews who were there, playing BINGO to raise money for Mary's new statue. And when Elizabeth heard the greeting of Mary, the baby leaped in her womb. And Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit, and she exclaimed with a loud cry so the entire crowd could hear her clearly, "BINGO!" (because her card was also filled) and also added, “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb! And why is this granted to me and all these other JEWS that the mother of my Lord should come to me and this throng of JEWS at this excellent fund-raiser"? For behold, when the sound of your greeting came to my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy. And blessed is she who believed that there would be a fulfillment of what was spoken to her from the Lord.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.