Sings to the Glory of God. "Cardinal" Radcliffe would do well to imitate it.
Posted on 10/15/2024 11:24:21 AM PDT by ebb tide
In an article published in the Italian daily edition of the Vatican newspaper, Cardinal-designate Timothy Radcliffe, OP, one of the synod session’s two spiritual assistants, took repeated issue with statements made by Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo Besungu, OFM Cap, the cardinal who leads the Symposium of Episcopal Conferences of Africa and Madagascar.
Cardinal-designate Radcliffe also linked African bishops’ qualms about homosexuality to “intense” pressure from American evangelicals, from Moscow, and from Muslims.
The October 2023 synod session’s synthesis report, wrote Cardinal-designate Radcliffe, “seemed to backtrack on the preparatory document on openness to LGBT people. The word is not even mentioned. Many saw this as a failure.”
“The Synod anticipated this misunderstanding,” he continued. “When seeds fall into the ground, not much seems to happen. They germinate quietly until spring.”
As he discussed the ways in which he sees the Spirit at work in the Synod, Radcliffe wrote that “the Holy Spirit invites us to leave our comfort zones as Westerners.”
“When the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, many said we had entered a new era, the triumph of Western liberal democracy,” he explained. “Every nation was destined to ‘evolve’ towards our way of life. If some countries, especially in the South, did not agree with us, for example, on welcoming gay people, sooner or later they would have to adapt. We were wrong. We are entering a multipolar world.”
Referring to Fiducia Supplicans—the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s December 2023 declaration on the pastoral meaning of blessings—Radcliffe continued:
Pope Francis also asks us to open the Church to everyone, whoever they are. Todos, todos, todos (All, all, all): the divorced and remarried, gays, transgenders.
But in some parts of the world, welcoming gays is seen as scandalous. Many Catholic bishops in Africa see it as an attempt to impose a decadent Western ideology on the rest of the world. Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo of Kinshasa, president of the organization that represents all the Catholic bishops of Africa, sees it as the symptom of a decadent Western culture. A few weeks ago he declared: “Little by little, they [Westerners] will disappear. We wish them a happy disappearance.”
How can we reconcile the two imperatives of Francis’ papacy: to be outward-looking to bring the Gospel to the ends of the earth, to all cultures, and to be open to all human beings, whatever their condition and whoever they are? The dilemma exploded with Fiducia supplicans, the declaration of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith that grants priests permission, especially in very specific situations, to bless couples in “irregular” relationships, including same-sex couples.
Cardinal Ambongo went to Rome to present the African bishops’ firm rejection of the proposal. Never before had all the bishops of a continent repudiated a Vatican document. Every attempt was made to calm the crisis. The Pope had approved the declaration. Cardinal Ambongo confirmed that African exceptionalism is an example of synodality. And he pointed out that unity does not mean uniformity. The Gospel is inculturated differently in different parts of the world.
Cardinal-designate Radcliffe then repeated his claim, made in an address in May, that the Gospel challenges the Church in Africa to welcome homosexuality.
“True, the Gospel is always inculturated in different cultures, but it also challenges every culture,” Radcliffe wrote in the Vatican newspaper. “Jesus was Jewish, yet he challenged the religion of his ancestors. Is the refusal to bless gays in Africa an example of inculturation or a refusal to be a nonconformist? Inculturation for one person is another person’s rejection of the nonconformist Gospel.”
Cardinal-designate Radcliffe then linked African bishops’ qualms about homosexuality to “intense” external pressures:
Another concern raised by Fiducia supplicans is that there appears to have been no consultation—even with bishops or other Vatican offices—before its release; not exactly, perhaps, a good example of synodality. African bishops are under intense pressure from Evangelicals, with American money; from Russian Orthodox, with Russian money; and from Muslims, with money from the rich Gulf countries. There should have been a discussion with them before, not after, the statement was released. Whatever we think about the statement, when we face tensions, and to overcome them, we all need to think and engage with one another on a deep level.
The Vatican newspaper posted Radcliffe’s article without any explanation. On page 10 of its daily edition, the article appeared under the heading “The Synod of Bishops”; in a sidebar, the newspaper’s editors introduced the article with these words:
Being open to new and unexpected friendships, leaving clericalism and one’s own comfort zone and opening oneself to all cultures in the name of Christian universalism. These are the ways in which the Holy Spirit works in the Synod, “and each of these invites us to a kind of death so that we can live.” These are the thoughts of the Dominican biblical scholar and theologian Timothy Peter Joseph Radcliffe—whom Pope Francis will create cardinal in the next consistory—on the three-year process of the Synod on Synodality, expressed during a conference held last Good Friday at Stonyhurst College, in the United Kingdom ...
The text, adapted, appeared in the English periodical The Tablet in April 2024 and was reprinted by Vita e Pensiero, a bimonthly magazine of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, in issue 4 of July/August in an Italian translation—edited by Simona Plessi—which we publish in our pages.
“True, the Gospel is always inculturated in different cultures, but it also challenges every culture,” Radcliffe wrote in the Vatican newspaper. “Jesus was Jewish, yet he challenged the religion of his ancestors. Is the refusal to bless gays in Africa an example of inculturation or a refusal to be a nonconformist? Inculturation for one person is another person’s rejection of the nonconformist Gospel.”
Francis really knows how to pick his cardinals. Maybe they ought to switch from red to pink vestments and call themselves flamingos instead of cardinals.
Ping
How about opposition because the Bible says it is an abomination. Surely in their basement of stolen treasures they have an accurate translation.
There was a flamboyance of pink flamingos nearby when I was younger.
They were beautiful birds!
They would take food right from your fingers.
But bewares, they have a sharp bite.
why does all that bring to mind the (imagined) image of a Francisian pink cardinal “working” the moonlight shift at the local gay bar?
(which, I must hurry to explicate, I’ve never visited! Ha!)
all to say, I miss the previous 2 popes. They were very different men with very different talents but both were, at least, recognizably Catholic/Christian. And both you could tell had at least read their Bibles.
"Qualms"????
Wretched faggot ...
They don't have "qualms" ... they have adamant opposition, based on Scripture and Tradition, to one of the Four Sins That Cry Out to Heaven for Vengeance.
Radcliffe is a liar, moron, and heretic. The African clergy’s opposition to homosexuality comes from the Bible and catholic moral teaching for 2,000 years.
Sings to the Glory of God. "Cardinal" Radcliffe would do well to imitate it.
RC so fears personal interpretation of the Bible.
Institutional interpretation is worse.
As a point of clarification, we don’t get personal interpretation of the Bible. If done right it is the Spirit speaking to us.
That is the New Covenant.
Heb_8:10 But this is the new covenant I will make with the people of Israel on that day, says the LORD: I will put My laws in their minds, and I will write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be My people.
Heb_10:16 “This is the new covenant I will make with My people on that day, says the LORD: I will put My laws in their hearts, and I will write them on their minds.”
It takes the Spirit and the Bible.
IF the Spirit is not pointing to Jesus (the Word) it is NOT the Holy Spirit.
“Cardinal-designate Radcliffe also linked African bishops’ qualms about homosexuality to “intense” pressure from American evangelicals, from Moscow, and from Muslims.” I would Cardinal-designate Radcliffe one very simple question: “If both of your parents had been strictly homosexual, would you even exist?”
If someone exhibits “recusal to be a non-conformist”, doesn’t that make him a non-conformist?
Get back to us after you clean up all of the liberal Protestant “sola scriptura” denominations that are even worse that Cardinal Radcliffe. You can start with the UCC, then move on to the PCUSA, then fix the ELCA, then ...
Get back to us after you clean up all of the liberal Protestant “sola scriptura” denominations that are even worse that Cardinal Radcliffe. You can start with the UCC, then move on to the PCUSA, then fix the ELCA, then ...
Being RC and $5 will get you a cup of coffee
Being P and $5 will get you a cup of coffee and glass of water.
So what is of value?
The difference, Timmy, is the Bible prohibits men lying with men. Timmy must be a raging homo who was looking forward to adopting some little African boys but for those pesky African priests.
He could have very well been talking about VC II, but that "spring" never came: just a 60-year drought.
You wrote: RC so fears personal interpretation of the Bible.
_____________
Jesus said, I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life.
One way, one truth, one life.
And yet through all their personal interpretations, Protestants have come up with several versions just of baptism:
1. Everyone can be baptized
2. Only adults can be baptized
3. Baptism does something to one’s soul
4. Baptism is only symbolic
5. Baptism must be full immersion
6. Baptism does not have to be full immersion
This is why I can not be Protestant and believe in personal interpretation, because it leads to several truths, not a unity of truth.
The Catholic Church is the Body of Christ. It is unfortunate that so many, both inside and outside the Church are trying again to destroy the Body of Christ.
In the fourth module of the Synod discussions, the members are discussing arguably the most controversial of all the topics which are officially on the table this month. (Female deacons and LGBT issues are technically not the focus of the Synod but of the study groups.)
Drawing from the Instrumentum Laboris, the members are for the next seven working days looking at a proposal that would give individual bishops’ conferences “doctrinal authority,” essentially having the Catholic Church break up into numerous different, often contradictory bodies.
Such a proposal is also being posited in line with another key Synod theme, namely the inculturation of the Gospel in accordance with local cultures.
Read Michael Haynes’ analysis of the news here.
Thank you. I would add that 2 Peter 1:20 and 1 Timothy 3:15 do not favor personal interpretation.
By the way, why were the participants asked, or required, to sign confidentiality agreements, when word of what they are to be discussing is out there in the public domain? (That's a rhetorical question.)
RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.