Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: JSM_Liberty

Except he did it in Greek or Hebrew.


10 posted on 05/30/2024 2:21:45 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: ealgeone

and on the Sabbath. That sort of spoils the whole Latin Mass thing altogether.


11 posted on 05/30/2024 2:39:55 PM PDT by BipolarBob (it's easier to fool the people than to convince them they've been fooled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: JSM_Liberty
Except he did it in Greek or Hebrew.

Pay no mind to the troll. He doesn't know; he wasn't there. In those times, people also spoke Latin and Aramaic.

12 posted on 05/30/2024 2:55:51 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ealgeone
Interesting that you would mention Hebrew, because Hebrew wasn't anyone's vernacular in St. Paul's day. The Jews reserved it for religious use, and used Aramaic or Greek for mundane use. IOW, Hebrew was a sacral language, set aside for use in worship ... much like Latin used to be for Catholics ... and maybe will be again.

You are correct that both liturgy and Scripture were known in the West in Greek before they were translated into Latin, although we don't know anymore just how much of the Roman Rite is a translation of a Greek original, and how much was composed de novo in Latin.

28 posted on 05/30/2024 5:46:45 PM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson