Posted on 03/29/2024 8:27:53 PM PDT by Morgana
In a recent “sermon,” false teacher Ashley Wilkerson, the self-described “pastor” of Pacific Coast Church posited an extraordinary claim—that the early church was teeming with female apostles whose names were subsequently altered in Scripture to mask their identities and contributions as women. This assertion, while striking, is completely absurd and crumbles under the weight of scriptural fidelity, historical scrutiny, and orthodox understanding.
Firstly, the apostolic office, as delineated in the New Testament, is not a title bestowed lightly. It is marked by direct commissioning by Christ Himself or, as seen in Paul’s case, a clear, divine calling. The primary roles of an apostle included witnessing Christ’s resurrection and teaching with authority conferred by Jesus. To suggest a widespread alteration of Scripture to exclude women from this office is just silly. The office is God-ordained, not humanly manipulated.
Secondly, the historical transmission of the biblical texts does not support Wilkerson’s assertion. The painstaking process of copying manuscripts across centuries was undergirded by a reverence for the Word’s sanctity and an understanding of its divine inspiration. While no historical process is perfect, the suggestion of a deliberate, systematic effort to alter apostolic names and genders lacks both evidence and credibility. The reliability of the scriptural manuscripts, confirmed by countless scholars and textual critics, stands in direct opposition to the idea of such conspiratorial alterations.
To imply that recognition of women’s roles requires altering scriptural identity is to overlook the profound contributions of women as recorded in the Scriptures themselves. Women like Phoebe and Priscilla were indeed important contributors to the early church’s growth and vibrancy. Their roles as supporters and servants are just as important within the New Testament without the need for alteration or misrepresentation.
Wilkerson’s error lies not in acknowledging the significant contributions of women to the early Christian church but in proposing a narrative of deliberate scriptural alteration that undercuts the integrity of the biblical text and the providence of its preservation. Such claims detract from the unity and truth of the gospel and women such as Wilkerson who pervert the gospel, undermine the integrity of God’s word, and make such outlandish claims should be marked and avoided.
VIDEO ON LINK
Christ did have a number of women that played significant roles in his life.
After Jesus, his mother Mary is #2.
I see a pattern involving women leading others into sin.
Oh really? Maybe you should ask emperor consantine, the one that put the new testament together, who he allowed and who he exempted from the new testaments writings.
Women don’t really have a great track record. Almost all of the defenders of the present darkness from trans ideology to abortion are women.
Oh and BTW, that was 300 years after Christ death.
Remember, Eve was deceived first, then Adam.
Teeming. Absolutely teeming.
No prob with the prevailing culture at the time.
Absolutely teeming.
when Jesus died on the cross there were three women named Mary there at the foot. Mary his mother, Mary of Magdalene, and Mary of Cleofas.
If she’s even a biological woman to begin with.
“Proposing a narrative of deliberate scriptural alteration that undercuts the integrity of the biblical text and the providence of its preservation”......is the work of the enemy of mens souls by creating doubt....a ‘Hook’ as so many others use to draw people away to something else.
That’s true.
Oh and one other thing, most of the Apostles writing were written between 50 and 150 years after Christ death.
Interesting is Jesus gave the care of his mother to John - (as son and mother) rather than family members...at the foot of the cross.
This is why women are not allowed in church leadership. Another anti-Christ.
Possibly but she does have a family and husband...
I recall studying the women of the bible 20 yrs ago but not in the context it’s being done today.
Yep.
I used to think that the story of Adam and Eve was just a silly story.
I now realize that it’s more meaningful today than ever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.