[NorthMountain]

You accused me of providing zero support.

That is a falsehood, and babbling about the Catholic Encyclopedia doesn’t help you. Gibbering about “newer translations” doesn’t help you either. In fact, it makes your position worse.

You posted a falsehood. You can admit it and at least preserve a shred of honor. Or you can continue to post falsehoods, knowing that they are false.

Your choice ...

[ealgeone]

NM…I know the evidence is hard for you and many Roman Catholics to accept. I’ve cited a Roman Catholic source on this dogma which supports what I’m saying. In all of these discussions I’ve had with your fellow RCs none have been able to impeach that witness. They ignore it as you do because it clearly contradicts what Rome claims.

Luke 1:28 does not say Mary is sinless nor does she remain sinless. I haven’t even brought up the church fathers who say she sinned. You cannot show me one clear verse to support your position. I on the other hand can supply several verses showing all have sinned.

[Elsie]

You can admit it and at least preserve a shred of honor.

---

Matthew 13:53-16:20
Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition

53 And it came to pass: when Jesus had finished these parables, he passed from thence.

54 And coming into his own country, he taught them in their synagogues, so that they wondered and said: How came this man by this wisdom and miracles?

55 Is not this the carpenter's son? Is not his mother called Mary, and his brethren James, and Joseph, and Simon, and Jude:

56 And his sisters, are they not all with us? Whence therefore hath he all these things?

57 And they were scandalized in his regard. But Jesus said to them: A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house.

58 And he wrought not many miracles there, because of their unbelief.