[Drago]

No biggie for me, I just find it strange that you risk excommunication with your dozens of posts critical of your RC Pope! It is heresy to criticize the supreme leader/theologian of your RC religion (Papal infallibility/”plenitudo potestatis”. You must spend a lot of time in the RC “penalty box”/confessional!!

Schismatic behavior/sin:
“...the person who refuses submission to the Roman Pontiff, whom Vatican I defined as having a universal PRIMACY OF AUTHORITY over the whole Church...”

https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/answers/heresy-shism-and-apostasy-24761

But by all means be the “Happy Heretic” if you wish! ;-) I was just a bit stumped by your continuing rejection of basic RC teaching on Papal Supremacy/infallibility.

[ebb tide]

You have tossed out words like "blasphemy", "heresy", "schimatic", etc with absolutely no concept of what they mean.

[fortes fortuna juvat]

I was just a bit stumped by your continuing rejection of basic RC teaching on Papal Supremacy/infallibility.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You have a complete misunderstanding of the meaning and scope of Papal Supremacy and infallibility. Instead of displaying your ignorance regarding same, if you can read why don’t you make an effort to find reliable source materials so you don’t make statements that reveal such stupidity?