Posted on 09/12/2023 1:25:19 AM PDT by spirited irish
Behind the numerous popular descriptions of the big bang, there is an elaborate mathematical edifice. The article calls it a “conceptual framework” upon which “floor upon floor has been added intact”. There is a story being told with this mathematics. However, is this story history based firmly on (observational, experimental) science, or is it largely a historical novel with elements of science fiction?
The SciAm article strongly suggests that it is the latter—a novel. It is based on an assumed history and is loosely grounded with elements of real science. But there is also lots of science fiction, including, as will be seen, the equivalents of the mythical dilithium crystals, warp drive, and cloaking fields from Star Trek
(Excerpt) Read more at patriotandliberty.com ...
ping
Lol asked and answered. It was kicked off by Charles Lyell with one goal. It was not a scientific one.
I always thought the Big Bang theory was an attempt to answer a question that has no answer with current scientific knowledge
What if the answer is a supreme being aka God created everything
That Jesus Christ is Who He said He is scares them and they refuse to allow His existence. But such folly, for they will stand before Him in judgment nevertheless.
Even with our exquisite knowledge of DNA, RNA, proteins, membranes, etc., all building up to the machinery of the cell and of reproduction... there is no convincing evidence of one species, even of viruses or bacterium, 'evolving' into another species.
If evolution is science, it's not empirical but occult science as it is an unseen energy working on unseen matter in an unseen dimension. From ancient times, this energy was worshipped as serpent power.
No one has ever seen, heard, felt, or in any way sensed evolution (serpent power) yet its worshippers would have us accept it as empirical science.
Just my opinion, even if the big bang were true, what created the elements within the big bang, why did it happen when it did, etc...
What I’m saying, no matter how the universe began, there will be questions that can’t be answered, unless you believe in some type of Supreme Being, I choose to believe in God and Jesus Christ.
It’s like the talk coming from the scientists working on the James Webb Space Telescope, how we are seeing to the end of the universe, my response is how do we know that, what is beyond our current ability to see into the past, if it’s the end of the universe, what is that like, is there a barrier, etc...
The concept of infinity is a concept that can’t be understood unless you fall back to the belief in a Supreme Being.
God can do whatever God wants ……
Little e evolution happens. Plants and animals adapt to their surroundings. The fit prosper, the unfit die off. Big E Evolution? Maybe not so much.
Nicely put.
Then we are all doing philosophy.
So far, I think his observation has not been challenged.
This is actually quite well established, and truth to tell, it is a testament to the natural order that is can regulate and adapt itself in this way.
I don't know how you define 'convincing', but this explains it fairly well.
The best part of the standard model is that, interpreted one way, given the physics we currently understand and all the isotropic equalities that are maintained therein, that everything that exists is simply a different expression of nothing at all.
It is an appropriate irony for this world that the more we drill down to the ultimate nature of 'what is real', the more unreal it becomes.
I’ll take the big bang theory(which I don’t believe) over a mythical tale 100,000 times over..
That’s fine, it’s not my mission to tell anyone what to believe when it comes to religion or God.
I choose to believe, you choose what you believe and makes you comfortable.
I’ll trust in the Creator. One day we’ll have better knowledge of how the universe was created.
That is not convincing.
For starters, it does not deal with the beginning.
That article states the evolution narrative. It does not demonstrate the narrative is true. Big difference.
Most Americans prefer science over myth. But the question is whether the Bible is mythical or true? Simply stating it's mythical and thinking that proves something is unscientific.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.