Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bank of America closes accounts tied to Christian outreach ministry
Christian Post ^ | August 24, 2023 | Ian M. Giatti

Posted on 08/29/2023 8:32:52 AM PDT by Morgana

Did Bank of America discriminate against a Tennessee ministry over its Christian views or was it simply a business matter?

Steve Happ, board member and founder of Indigenous Advance, a Memphis-based charity that, along with Indigenous Advance Customer Center LLC, has partnered with and served indigenous people in Uganda since 2015 to provide basic needs and share the Gospel.

Despite holding deposit and credit card accounts with Bank of America since its inception, Indigenous Advance received a series of letters in April in which the bank announced it was closing the group’s accounts within 30 days.

According to the nonprofit legal group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), the only explanation provided in the letters was that "upon review of [the] account(s) we have determined you're operating in a business type we have chosen not to service at Bank of America."

The group’s deposit account had over $270,000, according to ADF. A partner entity, Indigenous Advance Customer Center, LLC, and a church operating at the group's address, Servants of Christ Community dba University House of Prayer (UHOP), received similar letters closing their accounts.

Happ said after experiencing “shock and confusion” upon receiving one of the letters that referenced Indigenous Advance’s “business type,” he reached out multiple times to Bank of America.

“I asked them, ‘What type of business do you think we are?’ and they wouldn’t answer me,” he told The Christian Post via phone Wednesday. “They said, I’m sorry, we cannot give you that information.’”

Far from being simply an inconvenience, Happ said Bank of America’s actions significantly disrupted the group’s outreach and impact.

“When they closed the accounts, it meant that people who are dependent on us couldn't eat,” he said. “To us, it’s not that big of a deal if your paycheck is delayed for a day or two, but for Ugandans, they live day to day, trying to find where they’re going to find their next meal.”

Happ said due to the bank’s actions, Indigenous Advance couldn’t pay its employees or provide their ministry partners with donations until Hap returned to the States to sort out the issue.

In a statement shared with CP, a spokesperson for Bank of America said, “religious beliefs are not a factor in any account-closing decision,” but rather it was debt collection services provided by Indigenous Advance’s customer center that led to the account closures.

The statement added: “Our U.S. division that serves small businesses doesn’t offer banking services to organizations that provide debt collection services for a variety of risk-related considerations and doesn’t serve small businesses operating outside the United States.”

After a complaint was filed with the Tennessee attorney general’s office, it’s still unclear whether the state will open an investigation, but regardless of the outcome, ADF Senior Counsel and Senior Vice President for Corporate Engagement, Jeremy Tedesco, said Bank of America and other large banks are leveraging their own “risk tolerance” policies in order to “box out disfavored but legal business operations.”

The practice, said Tedesco, started during the Obama administration under “Operation Chokepoint,” which sought to eliminate fraud in the U.S. banking system but was criticized by Republicans and other industry advocates before it was shut down in 2017 under the Trump DOJ.

Tedesco said Operation Chokepoint used reputational risk as a “tool to get the federal regulators to push banks to push certain industries out of banking privileges and access to services” and may have opened the door to further “de-bank” Christians, conservatives and other aligned groups which “hold certain views the progressive Left doesn’t like.

“So now it’s reputationally risky to serve Christian or other organizations that the Left disagrees with,” he added.

He pointed to a separate incident last year where Chase Bank abruptly closed the bank account of the National Committee for Religious Freedom (NCRF), a faith-based nonprofit organization led by Sam Brownback, former U.S. Ambassador-At-Large for Religious Freedom.

“This is exactly what happened with JP Morgan Chase, Samuel Brownback, and the same story’s playing out here with Indigenous Advance,” Tedesco said.


TOPICS: Current Events; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: bank; banking; finance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Morgana

OLD GLORY BANK

Look it up. Bank with people having your values.


21 posted on 08/29/2023 10:47:59 AM PDT by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4177820/posts?page=23#23

https://iacustomercenter.com/services/


22 posted on 08/29/2023 11:38:53 AM PDT by MD Expat in PA (No. I am not a doctor nor have I ever played one on TV. The MD in my screen name stands for Maryland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

“add Wells Fargo as two banks I will never do business with.”

Quit using their (BOA) credit card years ago when I saw how they virtually always supported positions I disagree with.


23 posted on 08/29/2023 12:40:01 PM PDT by MDLION ("Trust in the Lord with all your heart" -Proverbs 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chicory

“No, because one is usual services and the other special services including a message.”

If the bakery doesn’t wish to provide services to any group that falls under the first amendment, just for the reason of the recognition within the amendment, then they are wrong. If they didn’t provide cakes to groups bigger than 500 or require certain types of hard to get products for the top, they are fine. But this one falls under constitutional rights and not opinions. This is why the bakery was taken to litigation. The baker won a supreme court decision on that one lost a later one:

“A Colorado baker who had won a narrow U.S. Supreme Court victory over his refusal to make a wedding cake for a gay couple on Thursday lost his appeal of a ruling in a separate case that he violated a state anti-discrimination law by not making a cake to celebrate a gender transition.”

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/colorado-baker-loses-appeal-over-refusal-make-gender-transition-cake-2023-01-26/#:~:text=(Reuters)%20%2D%20A%20Colorado%20baker,to%20celebrate%20a%20gender%20transition.

With the legal system, it’s many times a toss up.

wy69


24 posted on 08/29/2023 12:51:27 PM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: whitney69

Crazy!

Thanks, I didn’t know about the second case.


25 posted on 08/29/2023 2:43:59 PM PDT by Chicory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson