Elsie, I offered to walk you through any passage you are concerned with by pm.
Really?
I am not concerned about any of them.
I try to merely post Scripture without my or anyone elses 'explanation' of them.
You guys are overly concerned that I do not accept the 'Authorized Version' of the meaning of things.
But to go as far as to say that I am probably not 'saved'?
You posted to me in response to something I posted to another FReeper, asking a question about other passages.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/religion/4113877/posts?page=66#66
I tried to answer you out of kindness and offered to explain any of those passages you referred to.
Then you asked me about what you are missing by not having access to the original languages.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/religion/4113877/posts?page=133#133
And I again reminded you I offered to interact about any passage with you by pm.
If you live never knowing you are saved and secure, you will not advance into the positional truths. That said, there is a time for everything, "first the seed then the blade, then the leaf."
But to go as far as to say that I am probably not 'saved'?
You are not required to believe in eternal security to be saved. And if you are saved, you are secure, whether you accept it or not. I simply offered to discuss something in response to your questions.
Since you do not wish to do that, it's fine.
Blessings and Merry Christmas!