“More crawfishing, Vlad. The Palmarian “church” is not, and never was, the Roman Catholic Church.”
(sigh) Let me teach, again. If you look at any reliable Catholic source rather than relying on your own ignorance, you would discover the following: An antipope is “A false claimant of the Holy See in opposition to a pontiff canonically elected.” https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01582a.htm
Odermatt claims - on his own website - to be the pope.
“Just because Odermatt claimed it was, doesn’t make it so.”
He claims to be pope, and isn’t. That makes him an anti-pope.
“He was no more an anti-pope than Martin Luther or Henry VIII was.”
Neither Luther nor Henry claimed to be pope. Odermatt does - ON HIS OWN WEBSITE.
“Try as you might, you have not named one living antipope despite you’re false claim that “There are actually several anti-popes right now”.”
I named more than one. Odermatt claims to be the pope. His own website says: “The true Catholic Church of all times, founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ Legitimate Succession of the Cathedra of Saint Peter Ruled by His Holiness Pope Peter III”.
You are wrong. Stop being intellectually dishonest about it.
Wow! The nut has his own website, so it must be true! Right, Vlad?
If the nut is "Pope" Peter III, who was "Pope" Peter II?
Where's that "apostolic succession" that other antipopes have claimed to have had?