That is my "I just exonerated Ravi with one cut and paste" technique!
I had no idea how easy this discussing things online was until I attended:
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/24/2022 5:40:39 AM PDT by Religion Moderator, reason:
Childishness |
Posted on 03/06/2022 11:16:06 AM PST by CharlesOConnell
——>“Wings were given me, and an angel attended me from the city to a place that was bright and glorious.” Why did she need wings? She had an angel attending her. John didn’t need any, so why did she?
“You would have to ask her. It was her vision. I wasn’t there.”
That’s right, you weren’t. But you are, however, accountable for what you believe and certainly for what you post regarding the Bible and God Almighty, are you not?
——>Actually, I did read it, Phil. I had not realized that you all are supposed to be the 144,000, or either I forgot it. I thought it was the Jehovah’s Witnesses who believed they were the selected 144,000. (Does 12000x12 mean anything to you?)
“Does this mean anything to you?
“Rev 12:17And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.”
REMNANT. Who are the remnant? If you say the church, then you’re going to have to explain what it is a remnant of. And if you make the woman the church, you’re going to have to explain how the virgin Bride of Christ is preggers.
You keep lopping off Israel. Not a good idea. You end up with all kinds of kook theories like other planets with sinless people, etc. You MUST take God at HIS word, not HIS word and EGW’s word. Sorry. That won’t cut it. You can’t have both.
Let ME help YOU.
Safe?
When dancing angels are falling from pins due to overcrowding and now we are tangled within a catfight of varying opinions!
Taint NO one SAFE!
Watch out; or we Christians will be cited for theft of a LOT of Jewish writings!
...surely by now the old one stinketh!
I’m old too, but I pour it out in buckets full!
—> LOL!
Any post that you’ve made that starts with LOL! Goes on to prevaricate, obfuscate , or equivocate.
Again today!
I did not know that, Seven. It’s interesting indeed. Thank you!
I doubt he’s actually laughing.
Bet that he’s trying to disguise a ragepost ‘cause he gets pissed when we laugh at him.
—> Bet that he’s trying to disguise a ragepost ‘cause he gets pissed when we laugh at him.
Very possible, yes.
I took it as nervous laughter, preceding a post that was false.
—> In Phil’s world, statements made by family lawyers are standards of proof now, are they?
If Ravi’s family or ministry hired a small law firm to issue a statement that mirrored Phil’s post, he’d no longer have sinned…
That would cut out at least 50% of the posts around here!
Cc: Phil since I mentioned your name
Excellent, AMPU.
Page 17
Considering all factors necessary in reaching a just conclusion on this issue, it is submitted that the actions of Ravi Zacharias were conclusively and conclusively platonic.
CONCLUSIONS:
Based upon our review of the facts and legal precedents, we conclude that Ravi Zacharias was not involved in sexual immorality and his conduct did not constitute abuse of any kind.
By:_______________________
Vincent L. Ramik
Falseworld Legal Services, LLC
VLR/skl
I doubt we can reduce the poster’s obsession with the sins of Ravi because the poster is in stealth mode telling us he is not as bad as Ravi so he is okay.
That is one cool emoji! I’m surprised Mark has used it already.
That is my "I just exonerated Ravi with one cut and paste" technique!
I had no idea how easy this discussing things online was until I attended:
LOL+
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.