xzins wrote: Your odds of living go from 99.98 to 99.99? Per individual that’s almost like proving that 99.99999....is 100.”
Very similar to polio which had a survival rate of approximately 99%. Did you get a polio shot?
You mistake me for an anti-vaxxer. I am a retired member of the military. I have a shot record that fills an entire pamphlet.
So, the issue isn’t vaccinations, it’s THIS vaccination. The leading varieties in use for the last year have all used abortion derivatives in production or testing. They have also not had prescribed long term studies. They also use a new technique with mRNA. All of these have known and unknown consequences for the moral and physical health of a human being.
I have read recently that the Novavax is not the product of abortion derivatives. They have also used a protein based vaccine rather than an mRNA vaccine. They claim that they do not utilize abortion derivatives in their testing.
I checked that final claim with the Lozier institute chart of vaccines, and it’s possible they are correct. It depends on what it means to study the results of that testing. They apparently studied papers written on baby stem cell testing to inform their own testing.
Finally, they obviously have no long-term testing. That is a red flag.
Finally, I had covid very bad. I took ivermection and I got better after a real struggle. My wife got instantly better. So did my dentist. So did a few friends from church.
Others have done well with antibodies, others with hcq, and now it appears that peroxide nasal inhalants are effective.
Some folks respond to one or more of these. I suspect that had they been allowed to try any or all of these that our death rate would be much lower, and that means that the VAXX really has no huge advantage over the low incidence of death in the first place, and it probably would be less effective than the therapeutics + already low incidence of death.