Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Covid Vatican: Get a Vaccination Or Get Out
Gloria TV ^ | September 28, 2021 | Gloria TV

Posted on 09/29/2021 7:38:03 AM PDT by ebb tide

Covid Vatican: Get a Vaccination Or Get Out

Vatican Secretary of State Parolin issued a September 28 decree (below) confirming the need of a compulsory vaccination pass for Roman Curia staff, external contractors and visitors.

Thus, everyone entering the Vatican needs a vaccination which is free, or a costly negative Covid-19 test which must be paid by the employee.

In rare cases, medical exemptions are possible, unsurprisingly, exemptions on religious grounds are not considered.

Vatican personnel without a Covid-19 certification may not enter their workplace and this will be considered an unexcused absence. "Vaccination" protects neither against an infection nor against the spread of the infection.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: dictatorpope; francischism; parolin; scamdemic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
In rare cases, medical exemptions are possible, unsurprisingly, exemptions on religious grounds are not considered.
1 posted on 09/29/2021 7:38:03 AM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Sign of the beast. End times are upon us. Sacrificed baby parts injected into your body. Satanic.


2 posted on 09/29/2021 7:39:55 AM PDT by KierkegaardMAN (This is the sort of stuff up with which I shall not put!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The purebloods are now considered heretics.

Puts not being vaccinated above venial and mortal sins. Vaxial?


3 posted on 09/29/2021 7:42:39 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

4 posted on 09/29/2021 7:43:13 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; kalee; markomalley; ...

Ping


5 posted on 09/29/2021 7:43:43 AM PDT by ebb tide (Where are the good fruits of the Second Vatican Council? Anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

They should be implementing mandatory monthly HIV testing.


6 posted on 09/29/2021 7:44:24 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Jesus: I came not for the healthy (the righteous), but the sick (sinners). (Mark 2:17)

So-called "vicar" of Christ: You ain't allowed here unless ya got the mark of the healthy beast.

7 posted on 09/29/2021 7:51:56 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Frankie is scared of dying and going to Hell ...


8 posted on 09/29/2021 8:21:11 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Amongst other things, IMO


9 posted on 09/29/2021 8:29:31 AM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Im already going to hell for not believing exactly like they say I should so why would this matter any more than that? Why cant I still talk directly to God like they said I could when Covid hit and all the preachers were sick?

I think Luther had a case.


10 posted on 09/29/2021 8:29:35 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Get off your ass and earn it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN

Well to 100% fair, there has never been in Catholic theology a religious exemption for not taking medicines or vaccines. that is 100% accurate. So any Catholic going to their employer and saying as a Catholic I object on religous grounds has no standing. The Catholic Church has always argued someone on medical grounds as the right to get exempted from taking a medicine that would not help them and in fact could hurt them.

This is purely the Vatican deciding what the policy is to visit the Vatican Churches (Saint Peter) and Art Museums. So in reality who does this impact most, probably the millions of Catholics who visit the Vatican each year and tons of Chinese tourist who flock their in the Summer, at least it was the case in 2019 when I was there.

I suspect many of the posters where have never been to Vatican City and likely have no intention to go. Now with that said, with respect to Pope Francis I am no fan of his and in fact other than praying for the Pope at the Mass in the Eucharistic prayer, I don’t think much about him and short of him calling a Church Council, ignore everything he says.


11 posted on 09/29/2021 8:37:28 AM PDT by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CTrent1564

My observation was related to the fact that this ungodly maxim ultimately rests on the authority of Bergoglio, (if in fact he is the legitimate pope, which I believe is still open for debate) I lived in Rome for almost three years when Pope Saint John Paul II was the pontiff and Asian tourists were commonplace then as well. Our Church is under siege. The thousands of faithful that were denied extreme unction and died without the sacraments during the plannedemic would not have happened without the Judas bishops and priests being cowards or complicit or both.


12 posted on 09/29/2021 9:43:36 AM PDT by KierkegaardMAN (This is the sort of stuff up with which I shall not put!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CTrent1564

The Nuremberg Code applies to everyone, including the Pope.

He will need to be brought up on the dock and pay the price for anyone in the Vatican who gets seriously ill or dies from the mandatory vaxxes.


13 posted on 09/29/2021 9:45:44 AM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
It for sure doesn't seem like the Pope is really grasping the ideals of Lumen Gentium here... Does it? ("Bringing the Light to the World", for Steeler fans)

Could it be - perhaps- that he is a different anti-Vatican 2 cat deep down?... and only using the Council as an excuse to deviate for his "new Church" Gospel...hmmm...

Reminds one of the Don Meredith song he would sing on MNF... yes?
14 posted on 09/29/2021 10:28:06 AM PDT by MurphsLaw ("Law came in, to increase the trespass; but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Really, the Nuremberg code. Are you bleeping serious? Nobody is mandating anything. You aren’t vaccinated then you can’t go Vatican City. Simple as that. Period. As for the Priests who work in the Vatican, what the heck does the Nuremberg have to do with them.

The Italians who work in Vatican City are under the jurisdiction of the Italian Government. All the Vatican said is that those who work in Vatican City need to be vaccinated. If your note, go find another job.

And the Nuremberg courts are for what is defined as a War Crime, not vaccine mandates. The same people who staff the Nuremberg courts are people in Governments in Europe mandating vaccines in their respective countries.


15 posted on 09/29/2021 10:30:06 AM PDT by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw
Could it be - perhaps- that he is a different anti-Vatican 2 cat deep down?... and only using the Council as an excuse to deviate for his "new Church" Gospel...hmmm...

Not a chance, Murph. He is the first pope ordained as a priest (in 1969) after VC II.

He is a proud, rotten fruit of said Council and states so right here:

Pope says Vatican II shaped his theology, including in social teaching

16 posted on 09/29/2021 11:06:27 AM PDT by ebb tide (Where are the good fruits of the Second Vatican Council? Anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CTrent1564

“Well to 100% fair, there has never been in Catholic theology a religious exemption for not taking medicines or vaccines. that is 100% accurate. So any Catholic going to their employer and saying as a Catholic I object on religous grounds has no standing. “

This is from the Catholic Bishop in Colorado in his letter given to his priests. This letter was given to those faithful requesting religious exemption letters:

The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and
public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious basis on which a Catholic may determine that he or she ought to refuse certain vaccines:

Vaccination is not morally obligatory in principle and so must be voluntary.

There is a moral duty to refuse the use of medical products, including certain vaccines, that are created using human cells lines derived from abortion; however, it is permissible to use such vaccines only under case-specific conditions—if there are no other alternatives available and the intent is to preserve life.

A person’s assessment of whether the benefits of a medical intervention outweigh the undesirable side-effects are to be respected unless they contradict authoritative Catholic
moral teachings.

A person is morally required to obey his or her conscience.

A Catholic may judge it wrong to receive certain vaccines for a variety of reasons consistent with these teachings, and there is no authoritative Church teaching universally obliging Catholics to receive any vaccine.

An individual Catholic may invoke Church teaching to refuse a vaccine that used abortion-derived cell lines at any stage of the creation of the vaccine. More generally, a Catholic
might refuse a vaccine based on the Church’s teachings concerning therapeutic proportionality.

Therapeutic proportionality is an assessment of whether the benefits of a medical intervention outweigh the undesirable side-effects and burdens in light of the integral good of the person, including spiritual, psychological, and bodily goods.

The judgment of therapeutic proportionality must be made by the person who is the potential recipient of the intervention, not by public health authorities or by other individuals who might judge differently in their own situations.


17 posted on 09/29/2021 11:11:25 AM PDT by gracefullyparanoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw; amihow; Oystir; Al Hitan; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; ...
Pope Luther

18 posted on 09/29/2021 12:13:57 PM PDT by ebb tide (Where are the good fruits of the Second Vatican Council? Anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gracefullyparanoid

This is dangerous theological territory, in my view. Yes, the development of vaccines from aborted babies is morally illicit. That has been taught for a long time, going back to when Abortion became legal on demand in most countries and the Medical researchers began using stem cells from aborted fetuses for medical research.

As for this Bishop of Colorado, that may be appropriate for His Diocese and thus in terms of Catholic Discipline be acceptable but a different Catholic Bishop in a different Diocese may under his authority come to a different position.

Neither or right and neither or wrong since the issue her is Discipline and does not, unless we are talking about vaccines from aborted babies, contradict any Dogmatic Teaching.

I am vaccinated, after consultation with my Doctor. My Bishop is still requiring masks for attending Mass, although no limitation on numbers. He has not mandated vaccines but I don’t think he has said anything about using Catholic Doctrine for religious exemption.

The Morally bound to obey ones conscience always presupposes a 100 well informed one, which in today’s world, not sure is the case in most moral decisions.


19 posted on 09/29/2021 12:36:07 PM PDT by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gracefullyparanoid

https://www.ncregister.com/cna/monterey-bishop-prohibits-religious-exemption-from-covid-vaccine-mandates

Here is a reasonable and balanced article on US Catholic Bishops and Vaccine mandates. It is clear that the decision to issue a religious exemption or not is purely under the authority of the Local Bishop. The policy differs Diocese to Diocese.


20 posted on 09/29/2021 12:41:19 PM PDT by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson