The pachamama monstrance at St. John Macias parish in Zapopan, Mexico.
Posted on 09/16/2021 6:34:06 AM PDT by ebb tide
September 15, 2021 (Steven O’Reilly) – Beginning earlier this week, vaticanista Robert Moynihan of Inside the Vatican has begun to release the “Viganò Tapes“, videos of Viganò’s responses to various questions. As I understand it, one tape will be released each day over the course of 18 days.
So far, one can see the following three “Viganò Tapes:“
These are bound to be of great interest, so I encourage folks to follow Mr. Moynihan’s site to find each new release, as well as to read news and his insightful analysis of events in the Vatican.
In the latest video, tape 3, my attention was draw especially to Viganò’s closing comment. At the very end of the video, speaking of the role of the Deep State and the Deep Church, Archbishop Viganò says:
“It seems to me that in this conspiracy, the role of the Jesuit has been decisive, it is no coincidence that for the first time in history, a religious of the Society of Jesus is seated on the throne of Peter in violation of the rule established by Saint Ignatius of Loyola.”
Tape 3 ends on that note. Whether tape 4 expands on that comment or not, I do not know. However, for some context as to the rule “violation” spoken of above; each fully professed Jesuit — thus including Jorge Bergoglio, SJ — has taken the following vow:
“I also promise that I will never strive for or ambition any prelacy or dignity outside the Society; and I will to the best of my ability never consent to my election unless I am forced to do so by obedience to him who can order me under penalty of sin.” (see here)
Now, it may very well be the case that Viganò’s reference to the violation of the rule of St. Ignatius above was simply a casual aside. However, it is still an interesting question. Roma Locuta Est has taken a detailed look into the very interesting question of this Jesuit vow, and its potential implications for the validity of Cardinal Bergoglio’s acceptance of his election to the papacy. For those interested, that article and a link to a subsequent one may be found here:
Curiouser and Curiouser: Who Dispensed Jorge Bergoglio SJ from his vows?
Ping
*
Bkmrk
I GROANED OUT LOUD WHEN THEY ANNOUNCED HIM!!
bump for later reading
The Horror! A Buenos Aires journalist describes Bergoglio
March 13, 2013
Of all the unthinkable candidates, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is perhaps the worst. Not because he openly professes doctrines against the faith and morals, but because, judging from his work as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, faith and morals seem to have been irrelevant to him.
.......
I read that on Rorate Caeli on that dark day, 3-13-13. I hoped that it was wrong, exaggerated, unfair, etc. It wasn’t. He was every bit as bad as they said. Actually even worse.
Yes. Much worse.
I have to think that God is punishing us for six 62 million murdered babies.
And Pachamama worship over the grave of St. Peter.
I really don’t think we are to blame for that.
Well, I’m not taking blame for murdered babies either.
That’s why I won’t get the jab.
“Well, I’m not taking blame for murdered babies either.”
I fear being asked why I didn’t do more.
“The pachamama monstrance at St. John Macias parish in Zapopan, Mexico.”
They can call themselves “Catholic,” but God will sort us out.
He told us, he was driving his daughter into that same clinic to abort her baby a few years earlier. He said they both saw us outside and had a change of heart. The young girl in the portrait was his granddaughter who was not murdered that day.
I am reduced to silence. As I will be on that day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.