Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: livius
Technically, saying them counts for adding a part of the Old Mass to the NO mass, which is forbidden.

I don't think that's true. The prayers were never a "part of the Mass".

7 posted on 08/30/2021 10:28:38 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: ebb tide

The prayers weren’t a part of it, but they were required at the end. It was written and added to the required Leonine Prayers in 1886 by Pope Leo XIII. so, yes, while it wasn’t part of the Mass per se, they were required prayers upon ceasing the liturgical part.

They were dropped from the NO, which caused a great deal of distress to the people. They are considered suppressed and part of the TLM, and thus not supposed to be attached to the end of the NO and led by the priest (Cupich said laypeople could recite it privately).

In some dioceses, however, the bishop has actually permitted their resroration at the end of NO masses. But technically, they’re not supposed to be led by the priest, and that’s what Cupich used as his excuse.


9 posted on 08/30/2021 11:25:03 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson