Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eugene Peterson, The Message Bible Translation and homosexuality
Christian Post ^ | 08/17/2021 | Kelly Williams

Posted on 08/17/2021 10:08:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

I had the pleasure of meeting Eugene and Jan Peterson in the later years of their lives at The Glen Eyrie in Colorado Springs, the headquarters for the Navigators. I was invited by my friend Don Pape, who at the time was the senior acquisitions editor for NavPress.

I, along with about forty or so other Christian leaders from across the United States, got to hear from Eugene and Jan, ask them questions, and celebrate the achievements of their lives and ministry for Jesus. It was a joyous occasion.

Afterwards I had the privilege of meeting Eugene briefly and then being prayed for by Jan. In this season, my wife and I were going through a particularly difficult time, and Jan prayed the most beautiful prayer for my wife, Tosha. I am eternally grateful for her kind words and generous nature of her heart, energy and time that she gave me and my bride that day.

Since that time, Eugene and Jan have both gone on to be with the Lord Jesus but the legacy of their ministry lives on. Recently, a former Dallas Theological Seminary classmate of mine, Winn Collier, was asked and tasked with writing the memoirs and biography of Eugene’s life and ministry.

This past summer I read ABurning In My Bones. I was inspired by the faithfulness, honesty and determination of Eugene’s life to live the calling God had placed on his life. The honesty of Eugene and the willingness of him to allow Winn to tell the delicate details of his and Jan’s life were truly life-changing for me personally as a pastor. I am one that has been impacted greatly by having read this book and experienced his life through the written page.

As I continue on as a pastor, in this new and ever-changing world post-COVID, I find it harder and harder to see a unifying way forward for Christians. Each year, I read through the Bible three times, I am currently on my 93rd reading of the Bible. Periodically, I post verses I read in my devotions from my daily reading.

One such verse among many that I have posted this year was Leviticus 18:22, “Do not practice homosexuality.” (NLT) If you ever wonder if anyone reads your social media posts, just post a Scripture about homosexuality and you will quickly find out. Immediately the back and forth began, some applauding me and some condemning me. This issue remains a very decisive issue among Christians in the evangelical church today as it was during Eugene’s time.

Eugene spent his life interpreting the Bible into a language that was understandable for the common person. I appreciated this about him. He wanted people to experience God’s Word, I do too. If we as Christian leaders can get people to consume God’s Word, then God can speak to them directly.

Eugene said in his memoirs that he chose to leave out the word “Homosexual” in his translation of The Message Bible because he found the word in his words, “No longer treated in terms of an immoral behavior but as an immoral identity which is then attacked as an enemy. The term has been used so frequently in mean, dehumanizing ways, that it is difficult to use it in the spirit of Paul and Jesus in our culture.”

I found his explanation helpful and for the most part, I could understand why he chose not to use the English word “Homosexual.” It doesn’t appear from this explanation that Eugene was trying to say that the practice of homosexuality is not a sin. He translated Leviticus 18:22 like this, “Don’t have sex with a man as one does with a woman. That is abhorrent.”

Some have argued that this verse is not directed toward gay sex but toward male prostitution. But for a second, let’s agree, even with Eugene’s gracious interpretation it is difficult to see how this verse condones bi-sexuality. And the Christian LGBTQ community is firmly committed to the lifestyle of not only the gay community but the bi-sexual community as well. At some point, it seems one must explain away completely this verse in order to embrace the entire LGBTQ community.

Now let me state for the record, as a pastor, I believe the Bible teaches in both the New and Old Testament that homosexuality is a sin. But with that said, it is not the sin. It is one of many sins listed in Scripture. And even though I believe the Bible teaches it is a sin, I have people in my life whom I love that see it differently. It appears Eugene did too.

In the summer of 2018, Jonathan Merritt interviewed Eugene and asked him the question, “Would you marry a gay couple?” His short answer was, “Yes.” You can read the larger details surrounding this interview and response in A Burning In My Bones.

Suffice to say here, it set off a firestorm and Lifeway threatened to remove all of Eugene’s books if he didn’t clarify his comment. Eventually, he released a statement affirming the biblical view of marriage between a man and a woman. But this confusion and seemingly double-speak left the door open to what Eugene’s intent was for not using the word “Homosexual” in his interpretation of Scripture in The Message Bible.

I admire much of Eugene’s life, work and ministry. I am forever grateful for Jan’s prayer for my wife that day. But I must be a voice that says, “The Bible does not approve of people practicing homosexuality in their lives.” It is possible to love people and not accept their behavior. God does it with me every day. We don’t need to change the definition of sin to experience God’s love. But if we do, we will lose the grace of God’s forgiveness.

May we live in the tension of truth and love with our gay loved ones today.


Kelly Williams is co-founder and senior pastor of Vanguard Church in Colorado Springs, Colorado. His books include: The Mystery of 23, Friend of Sinners and Real Marriage. He also maintains a blog.



TOPICS: Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: bible; eugenepeterson; homosexuality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 08/17/2021 10:08:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Message is not a translation but a commentary.


2 posted on 08/17/2021 10:15:55 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Peterson disseminated a horrible MIStranslation, or transliteration, of The Holy Bible.

If it ain’t broke.....


3 posted on 08/17/2021 10:16:17 AM PDT by fwdude (True shepherds carry a sling and plenty of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
From Wikipedia :

The Message: The Bible in Contemporary Language is a highly idiomatic translation of the Bible by Eugene H. Peterson published in segments from 1993 to 2002. It is a simplistic translation of the Bible's original languages.
4 posted on 08/17/2021 10:17:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t know who the writer is nor his subject.

I can only have a first impression and it is on balance negative.


5 posted on 08/17/2021 10:22:08 AM PDT by ifinnegan ( Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I disagree with the far left Wiki. It is Peterson’s personal interpretation of what the Bible means, thus making it a commentary.


6 posted on 08/17/2021 10:22:35 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

and a wicked one at that. by omitting the truth he clearly broke with God by not adding or subtracting from HIS Word.


7 posted on 08/17/2021 10:27:34 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well that was sure a lot of happy talk.
I guess Peterson was not around when Moses wrote. How sad. Moses needed an editor?
Peterson should have used a word like “sodomite”, or “sodomizer”.
Romans 1 makes things very clear. Peterson chose poorly, and he deliberately altered God’s Word to make it more acceptable to the spirit of the world and of this age. If I recall, Peterson did this a lot.


8 posted on 08/17/2021 10:36:47 AM PDT by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Speaking of that, how do you suppose the Taliban will treat the trannie-homosexual-nonbinary-LBQTXYZ community when it takes over? Do you suppose the Taliban is busy learning all the pronouns right now?


9 posted on 08/17/2021 10:39:57 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Contempt for truth is the evil most fundamental to the decadence of Western Civilisation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“This issue remains a very decisive issue among Christians in the evangelical church today as it was during Eugene’s time.”

No it doesn’t. It may be a divisive issue between Christians in the church and non-Christians in the church, but the Christians in the church will all agree on this one.


10 posted on 08/17/2021 11:02:54 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
He translated Leviticus 18:22 like this, “Don’t have sex with a man as one does with a woman. That is abhorrent.”

Thats crystal clear.

11 posted on 08/17/2021 11:33:24 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

They are probably busy finding the tallest buildings ...


12 posted on 08/17/2021 11:43:34 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marron

Yes.

“That is abhorrent.”

Abhorrent: inspiring disgust and loathing; repugnant.
When you think of abhorrent, think of horror, as in something so vile and loathsome that you can only react to it in horror.

That is how our Lord and Master sees it. As in: detestable, hateful, loathsome, despicable abominable, execrable, ted, repellent, repugnant, repulsive, revolting, disgusting, distasteful, horrible, awful, heinous, reprehensible, obnoxious, odious, nauseating, offensive, contemptible. YES, IT IS THAT BAD!


13 posted on 08/17/2021 12:05:03 PM PDT by egfowler3 (Still a Deplorable, a 'Clinger', a Christian 'Infidel', an American & 'vast right-wing conspirator')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I have a question related to the article

Since Christians are a New Testament creation why do the Old Testament covenants pertain to them regarding homosexual behavior?

14 posted on 08/17/2021 12:20:42 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

An abomination before the Lord does not change, for in Him is not shadow of yurning.


15 posted on 08/17/2021 1:09:43 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

ABOMINATION is a pretty strong word. I know of no stronger word than that.

Having sex with the same sex is an ABOMINATION to God.

Nothing to discuss here. Nothing to interpret.

Its WRONG! God HATES IT! GET IT?

Unrepentant, practicing, homosexuals are going to burn in hell for all eternity.

I hope all the thrilling deviant sex was worth it for them.


16 posted on 08/17/2021 2:13:43 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Don’t worship those people. Stop worshipping yourself.

Read the bible almost 100 times? If you don’t get it by now...

God is a jealous God. Worship ONLY Him.

If the Left Behind story came true, I’m afraid you would be the pastor “left behind”.

I color you clueless.


17 posted on 08/17/2021 2:19:06 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Yes indeed it surely does change. There is a reason for an old and new testament.
18 posted on 08/17/2021 2:27:18 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

I don’t know why you’re making your list personal. You’re attacking someone conveying an article.


19 posted on 08/17/2021 2:55:48 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

God does not change. When He calls something qn abomination it remains an abomination becauyse He dioes not change. Homo behavior is called an abomination in the OT. It remains an abomination froever. Deend soem other behavior, but not what GOD stamps as an abomination.


20 posted on 08/17/2021 3:10:08 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson