Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archbishop Di Noia says his letter to Archbishop Gomez was routine
National Catholic Reporter ^ | June 17, 2021 | Cindy Wooden

Posted on 06/19/2021 4:35:14 AM PDT by Petrosius

VATICAN CITY — Archbishop Augustine Di Noia, adjunct secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, said a letter he sent in late May to the president of the U.S. bishops' conference was simply "a letter of acknowledgment" of the receipt of communication from him.

Archbishop José H. Gomez of Los Angeles, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, read from Di Noia's letter June 16 at the U.S. bishops' meeting.

Di Noia said he thought the letter was read "in order to demonstrate the collaborative relationship between the CDF and the USCCB, in order to counter suggestions to the contrary that are in the air."

"The letter contained a bland sentence that has received a lot of unmerited attention in the press: The congregation 'looks forward to the informal review of the eventual draft of a formal statement on the meaning of the Eucharist in the life of the church,'" Di Noia said in an email to Catholic News Service June 17.

"It would be helpful if you were to explain the utterly routine character of such communications," the archbishop added.

Cardinal Luis Ladaria, prefect of the doctrinal congregation, had written May 7 to Gomez urging a focus on dialogue and unity in any attempt by the bishops to address the situation of Catholics in public office who support legislation at odds with Catholic teaching, particularly on abortion.

In a May 22 letter, Gomez clarified the parameters of the proposed document and sent the U.S. bishops a brief outline of what had been prepared by the bishops' doctrine committee. Gomez sent a copy of that to the Vatican doctrinal congregation as well.

Di Noia's May 28 letter was an acknowledgment of the Vatican's receipt of what Gomez had sent. In Italian, such correspondence is called "'an accusa di ricevuta' in which we thank the president of the USCCB for the memorandum and brief outline of a possible document, basically the publicly available documentation that would form the basis for discussion on this particular issue at the general meeting," Di Noia told CNS.

The letter, as quoted by Gomez, read: "On May 24, 2021, this congregation received your memorandum sent to the bishops of the United States, which included a brief outline prepared by the doctrine committee to be proposed to the body in June. This dicastery is grateful for the information and looks forward to the informal review of the eventual draft of a formal statement of the meaning of the Eucharist in the life of the church.''

"Never has a letter of so little moment received such a level of unmerited attention," Di Noia said. "When we heard about the furor, we looked high and low for a letter bearing my signature that could possibly have created such a fuss. Finally, late this afternoon, we realized that they were talking about an 'accusa di ricevuto,' which we then located in the appropriate file."


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: communion; usccb; vatican
Cardinal Cupich et al. mischaracterized this letter to imply that Pope Francis wanted the USCCB not to issue an instruction on the Eucharist that would bar Catholic politicians who support abortion from receiving Communion.
1 posted on 06/19/2021 4:35:14 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

No, this is just the Vatican doing damage control, since the USCCB went ahead and ignored their “advice.”

Whether the USCCB ultimately does anything that makes a difference is another matter. But you can bet the Vatican is going to be pretty busy behind the scenes attempting to head them off at the pass…although the Vatican minions may be a little more discreet this time.


2 posted on 06/19/2021 4:43:05 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

Too many bureaucrats, not enough Latin.


3 posted on 06/19/2021 4:47:16 AM PDT by steve8714 (Evidently the Oxford comma is racist, sexist, or homophobic. You decide which.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius; ebb tide

Cupich, and Gregory (Washington D.C. representing Obama actually) are truly evil.


4 posted on 06/19/2021 4:54:52 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

Good way of putting it!


5 posted on 06/19/2021 5:08:11 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

As Saint Pope JPII said, “In this little host is the solution to all of the world’s problems” however, the clerics prefer to argue about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. It’s time to proactively confront the evil in our lives and the world through Christ’s true presence in the Eucharist! Hey bishops, this is THE solution!


6 posted on 06/19/2021 5:09:26 AM PDT by pke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
Or how does the beltway media phrase it....
They are “walking it back”.....?

Or they realized perhaps, unintentionally, it occurred to them
that they were on the path to end up on (another cliche alert)
“the wrong side of history.”...
7 posted on 06/19/2021 7:13:58 AM PDT by MurphsLaw (“I beseech you, brethren, to mark them who make dissensions and offences contrary to the doctrine”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

This PR posturing and posing and damage control of the Vatican in defense of worldly issues is becoming more and more apparent.


8 posted on 06/19/2021 9:58:45 AM PDT by Marchmain (If you're vaccinated, why do I need to wear a mask?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw

Definitely walking it back. But at the same time, they’re probably preparing their new attack. Be wary.


9 posted on 06/19/2021 2:42:24 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson