[Elsie]

The point of the thread is it's more accurate than the Masoretic Text and was written earlier than the MT.

Let's just say that it APPEARS to have been written earlier; according to the evidence we now have in hand.

I wonder what would happen to the 'accuracy' claim if a MT is discovered that chrono testing shows that it predates The Septuagint?

[chuckles]

Google is your friend. Google Masoretic text and see when it was written. Why are you replying to posts you no nothing about?

[Elsie]

I wonder what would happen to the 'accuracy' claim if a MT is discovered that chrono testing shows that it predates The Septuagint?

They argued well over a century ago the Hittites historical existence was fantasy, 
thus the story of the Hittites being in the land when Abraham came in was false, 
thus the story of Abraham also was false.

When archaeological discoveries proved the existence of the Hittites in the Levant, 
both in and outside of Palestine, they, like skeptics today, refuse to believe and repent 
and mive on to ongoing unbelief. Jesus raised the dead and they in His time refused to believe.

Nice example of my questioning in reply #22 here...

[Elsie]

<Blockquote>

 

<table border=1 cellpadding=10><tr><td>

 

<pre>

 

How to jazz up your display of stuff.

 

</pre>

 

</td></tr></table>

 
</Blockquote>
 

 

 

 

 

 
How to jazz up your display of stuff.