Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What do the unanswered criticisms of Amoris Laetitia teach us today?
Rorate Caeli ^ | April 28, 2021 | Roberto de Mattei

Posted on 04/28/2021 8:49:42 PM PDT by ebb tide

What do the unanswered criticisms of Amoris Laetitia teach us today?


 

(Roberto de Mattei) Five years ago, on 8 April 2016, the post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation Amoris Laetitia, the most controversial document of Pope Francis’ pontificate, was published. This document is the outcome of a process initiated by Walter Cardinal Kasper’s intervention in the February 2014 consistory. Cardinal Kasper’s thesis on how the Church should renew its marriage praxis formed the leitmotif of the two synods on the family in 2014 and 2015. Unfortunately, the final exhortation Amoris Laetitia turned out to be even worse than Cardinal Kasper’s report. While the German cardinal had asked some questions, Amoris Laetitia offered the answer, opening the door to remarried divorcees and implicitly authorising more cohabitations. This is why, in 2017, philosopher Josef Seifert went so far as to say that Amoris Laetitia “has the logical consequence of destroying the entire Catholic moral teaching”.

However, the countless criticisms of Amoris Laetitia – in books, articles, interviews – have made history even more than the document itself. Among these criticisms, two stand out in a particular way. The first is the Dubia presented to the Pope and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on 19 September 2016 by Cardinals Walter Brandmüller, Raymond Burke, Carlo Caffarra, Joachim Meisner; the second is the Correctio filialis de haeresibus propagatis, addressed to Pope Francis on 11 August 2017 by more than 60 Catholic scholars and pastors of the Church, which, within a month of the publication of the document, became 216 theologians, professors, scholars of all nationalities.

Both the Dubia and the Correctio filialis have had a worldwide impact, but neither of these documents has received a response; despite the fact that a request for an audience was made to Pope Francis on 25 April 2017 by the four authors of the Dubia, two of whom (Caffarra and Meisner) are now deceased. The refusal of the Successor of Peter to receive the cardinals who are his advisors seems inexplicable, all the more so since Francis wished to make “welcome” the trademark of his pontificate, stating in one of his first homilies (25 May 2013), that “Christians who ask… should never find doors closed”. On the other hand, on 15 March 2021, Luis Cardinal Ladaria, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in response to a dubium regarding the question “Does the Church have the power to give the blessing to unions of persons of the same sex?”, defined the blessing of homosexual unions as “illicit”, given that “there are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family”. This statement, which reaffirmed Catholic doctrine, caused an explosion of dissent, especially in Germany. The silence on the issues raised by the Dubia and Correctio filialis, on the other hand, has caused great exasperation in the traditional Catholic world. 

This contradictory governing practice risks leading the Church toward a grave schism, or rather toward a process of religious fragmentation that could have catastrophic consequences. The primary responsibility for this situation lies with the supreme shepherd, rather than with the bewildered flock. The number of maddened sheep is bound to increase until Rome makes its voice heard in a clear and definitive way. In this confusion, the publication of two serious and well-documented books offering a bleak picture of the current religious tragedy, is all the more timely.  

The first, compiled by Voice of the Family, is an electronic publication titled The Unanswered Concerns about "Amoris Laetitia": Why the Apostolic Exhortation Remains a Danger to Souls. A team from Voice of the Family was present in Rome at both the Extraordinary Synod in October 2014 and the Ordinary Synod in October 2015. Voice of the Family produced in-depth analyses of the most important synodal documents from the perspective of pro-life and pro-family advocates and distributed these to cardinals and bishops throughout the world. Indeed, as the introduction to the volume notes, “there are statements in Amoris Laetitia which directly contradict the authoritative teaching of the Catholic Church, and there are further statements that undermine it without directly contradicting it”.

The second volume, Defending the Faith against Present Heresies, is edited by Professors John R.T. Lamont and Claudio Pierantoni and has a preface by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò. Both works contain the texts of the Dubia and Correcio filialis. The Voice of the Family book includes in addition “Theological Censures against Amoris Laetitia” by forty-five theologians and the May 2019 “Declaration of the Truths Relating to Some of the Most Common Errors in the Life of the Church of Our Time”. Lamont and Pierantoni’s book contains, in addition to the "Theological Censures", the “Open Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church”, “An Appeal to the Cardinals of the Catholic Church”, and the protest Contra recentia sacrilegia. In his introduction, John Lamont recalls how these documents came into being; the book also includes contributions by Anna M. Silvas, Fr John Hunwicke, Claudio Pierantoni, Claire Chretien, Roberto de Mattei, Robert Fastiggi and Dawn Eden Goldstein, Joseph Shaw, Michael Sirilla, Edward Peters, Edward Feser, Fr Brian Harrison, John Rist, Peter A. Kwasniewski, Maike Hickson, Thomas G. Weinandy, O.F.M. Cap, Pauper Peregrinus, and Professor Lamont himself.

Re-reading these texts today is instructive, both in terms of form and substance. In recent years, the theological substance of the issues has been lost and the language has often become coarse and aggressive. These two collections of documents, on the other hand, help us to understand how Catholics speak within the Church. It is a pity to see a loss of this theological substance and balanced style in the controversies that have emerged regarding the vaccination against Covid-19. In this debate, some critics of Amoris Laetitia have been accused of inconsistency for accepting the statements of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on vaccines issued in 2008 and 2015. The answer to this objection is simple. The signatories of the Correctio filialis never criticised the authority of the Pope or the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, because the Church is a hierarchical society and it cannot do without a supreme authority. Instead, they criticised a document promulgated by the supreme authority, finding it in contradiction to the previous Magisterium of the Church. In adherence to theological and moral truths, the ultimate court is one’s conscience; but an external objective principle or norm is required on which the conscience can be founded. This external law is stated by the Church through her Magisterium which is, in this sense, the proximate norm of our faith. If this is expressed in an equivocal or ambiguous manner, denying even implicitly on a practical level a truth of faith, concerning, for example, the conjugal union, Catholics have the duty to remember that the doctrine on sacramental marriage cannot be modified by any ecclesiastical authority, not even by the Supreme Pontiff. Those who criticise Amoris Laetitia do not use their own conscience as a point of reference, but the perennial Magisterium of the Church. 

The eve of possible schisms is not the time to divide the Catholic world but to unite it on the basis of the Tradition of the Church. Claudio Pierantoni, in his “Reflections on a New Dialogue between Traditionalist and Conservative Catholics” (in Defending the Faith), explains that many of the documents presented in the book he co-edited with John Lamont are the result of the happy encounter between the representatives of “Catholic Traditionalism” and the “Conservative Catholicism” from whose ranks he comes. “May this book be a testimony and an example of the joint effort that has been carried in the last four years, and an encouragement for the years to come,” he writes. I make Professor Pierantoni’s wish my own: to form, in these difficult times, “a new, more compact front of orthodoxy”. What is needed is a convergence and alliance of different initiatives of clergy and laity, each at their own level and according to the possibilities available to them, to confront the chaos that threatens us, entrusting ourselves and the success of our battle to the help of God, without Whom no success will ever be possible. The two books that have just been published point the way. 

(English translation: Voice of the Family)



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Moral Issues; Theology
KEYWORDS: apostasy; francischism; heresy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 04/28/2021 8:49:42 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; kalee; markomalley; ...

Ping


2 posted on 04/28/2021 8:50:38 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
WHAT A BUSY DAY YOU HAD YESTERDAY....
7 POSTS IN ONE DAY!


dont you worry about being a little over-exposed?
3 posted on 04/29/2021 4:44:37 AM PDT by MurphsLaw (“speak against the holy Ghost, it shall not be Forgiven him, in this world, NOR in the world to come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw

It’s your Bobby Barron who is over-exposed, thanks in large part to your efforts.


4 posted on 04/29/2021 9:24:42 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
that could have catastrophic consequences

The catastrophe has already taken place, in the self-interested coverups and rationalizations of a cult of homosexual men who have used the Church to oppress and prey upon the young (and not-so-young) men to satiate their own perverse desires.

No sacramental abuse, no deviation from the traditions of the Church, could have any consequences worse than those already engendered, and increasingly perpetrated in the open, by the Lavender Mafia in charge of the Church.

5 posted on 04/29/2021 9:33:57 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw

Whoever taught you catechisis must have also taught you how to count.

I posted 6 articles yesterday.


6 posted on 04/29/2021 9:51:10 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

They teach us that Bergoglio’s a heretic and possibly a False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist.


7 posted on 04/29/2021 10:09:09 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
It’s your Bobby Barron who is over-exposed, thanks in large part to your efforts.

Me ? He's got millions of Catholics who enjoy his work...I have no part in that...

Actually though,... it's kinda funny... but the Bp. has joked about HIS OWN MOTHER being concerned - that he is getting over exposed...too visible

sheesh !... et tu, mi madre? !!!!!
8 posted on 04/29/2021 10:26:03 AM PDT by MurphsLaw (“speak against the holy Ghost, it shall not be Forgiven him, in this world, NOR in the world to come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Whoever taught you catechisis must have also taught you how to count.
I posted 6 articles yesterday.


Sorry Mr. Ebb, Another indictment of yours discredited for the absence of Faith, Hope and accuracy.... No I was correct... It was 7 posts

4/28/2021, 12:07:42 AM -by ebb tide · 3 replies
4/28/2021, 12:17:11 PM -by ebb tide · 8 replies
4/28/2021, 5:47:01 PM · by ebb tide · 12 replies
4/28/2021, 6:12:34 PM · by ebb tide · 1 replies
4/28/2021, 7:56:20 PM · by ebb tide · 7 replies
4/28/2021, 9:30:09 PM · by ebb tide · 8 replies
4/28/2021, 11:49:42 PM ·by ebb tide · 6 replies


So I thought you would appreciate me pointing out your error....
9 posted on 04/29/2021 10:33:09 AM PDT by MurphsLaw (“speak against the holy Ghost, it shall not be Forgiven him, in this world, NOR in the world to come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw

Do ever think that I could live in a different time zone than yours, smart alek?

Never mind. I didn’t think so.


10 posted on 04/29/2021 10:45:54 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Sooory - that doesnt fly for an excuse ... try that with the IRS and see how that works.
In any event then...you could have been traveling on the road and crossed over into a different time zone... Iv've heard of this before...So how can we really be sure- that would require an investigation...
It doesn't matter though.. its a 24 hour clock -- its within a 24 hr window that was violated....
Had you not accused me .... and promoted a scurrilous attack on my Faith formation.... I could have let it go...
Now it will haunt you.
11 posted on 04/29/2021 12:13:45 PM PDT by MurphsLaw (“speak against the holy Ghost, it shall not be Forgiven him, in this world, NOR in the world to come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw
Sooory - that doesnt fly for an excuse ... try that with the IRS and see how that works.

Murph, you continue to amaze me. I see your ignorance of the Catholic faith carries over into your ignorance of secular tax laws.

THe IRS judges delinquency by postmarks reflecting the location of the mailing location. Midnight on the east coast is not midnight on your Barron's left coast.

In any event then...you could have been traveling on the road and crossed over into a different time zone...

Why would you propose such a false scenario, if not out of malice?

It doesn't matter though.. its a 24 hour clock -- its within a 24 hr window that was violated....

So now Murph defines her day? How does Murph explain Jesus Christ rising from the dead in less that 72 hrs?

Is the Apostles Creed wrong? Should it be "on the second day, He rose again from the dead according to Murph's time"?

... I could have let it go... Now it will haunt you.

Murph, you no more haunt me than Bergoglio, Barron, Cupich nor Gregory.

But rest assured. Y'all are in my prayers for the conversion of sinners.

12 posted on 04/29/2021 1:52:19 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw
He's got millions of Catholics who enjoy his work...

And thousands of Catholics enjoyed Martin Luther's work. They became "protestants".

And millions of souls have "enjoyed" (under the sword) Mohammad's rantings.

What's your point?

13 posted on 04/29/2021 2:24:22 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
My point was MATHEMATICAL (but since you have issues with the clock....) - and if you would notch up your comprehensive reading skills one bit-
as YOU accused ME on adding to Bishop Barron's visibility - I thought the math regarding the size of Bp. Barron's ministry - in the tens of millions actually - contrasting with my little posting ability to increase that already fantastically wild number- IRRESPECTIVE Of errancy --... was silly...
14 posted on 04/29/2021 3:01:28 PM PDT by MurphsLaw (“speak against the holy Ghost, it shall not be Forgiven him, in this world, NOR in the world to come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

So you are denying POSTING 7 Times in 24 hours ??


15 posted on 04/29/2021 3:03:41 PM PDT by MurphsLaw (“speak against the holy Ghost, it shall not be Forgiven him, in this world, NOR in the world to come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw
My point was MATHEMATICAL

What about it?

Catholics Helped Elect Joe Biden as More Voters Shrugged Off Abortion Issues, Hostile Clergy

Does the majority rule in Murph's "church"?

16 posted on 04/29/2021 3:20:32 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw

You have serious problems.

Symptomatic of a stalker.

Get help.


17 posted on 04/29/2021 3:23:42 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw

So are you denying Jesus Christ did not rise again from the dead in three “murph days”?

Pathetic.

Take a hike a Murph. And you’ll never “haunt” me.


18 posted on 04/29/2021 3:36:32 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

If you would just answer my questions .... this would not be so arduous...


19 posted on 04/29/2021 4:03:12 PM PDT by MurphsLaw (“speak against the holy Ghost, it shall not be Forgiven him, in this world, NOR in the world to come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MurphsLaw
Did Jesus Christ rise again from the dead in three (24-hour) murph-days?

A simple "Yes" or "No" will suffice, Murph.

P.S. This article was about Bergogoio's "Amoris Laetitia", which your heretic Bobby Barron fully supports.

Your attempt to hijack it with your "murph-days" limit is both pathetic and petty.

If you are such a stalker. Count my posts the day prior and the day after before you accuse me of violating your "murph-days" limit.

And please let me know the exact zero hour (GMT) of your self-designated countdowns.

20 posted on 04/29/2021 4:58:58 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson