And why do you misstate someone's clear wording so you can keep attacking your own false representation?
See post #11, this very thread which you posted!
Not really obsessed with Ravi Z — for the record, I don’t consider the accusations (note: “accusations”) against him to be something to excoriate him — they aren’t proven and until they are, I would disregard them - as I said.
What IS interesting is the question Phil posed to you - with the hypothetical question
If person X is born again and sins - do you, MHG, say that that person has sinned or do you, MHG, say that it wasn’t the spirit of the person who sinned but their body or their soul. So person X is innocent in your opinion because it was just X’s body that sinned.