Posted on 02/22/2021 2:28:54 PM PST by ebb tide
Marx lives behind The Walls.
Ping
This is an excellent article, very important stuff right at the end so read it all Friends!
Really good translation too, I thought it must be one after I accepted their cookies in Italian (hope that’s what I did), but confirmed by the charming translator’s note about the sports newspaper.
Thanks so much for sharing this!
I can imagine a schism within the Roman church, conservative Catholics seeking to abandon Rome and revisit the idea of Moscow, Third Rome.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_as_the_Third_Rome
When the original great center of Christendom, Rome, fell to the barbarians, the center shifted east to Constantinople. So when in turn, Constantinople fell, Moscow assumed that it would become the “third Rome” of Christianity.
They were unhappy when instead it shifted back to Rome, and they have never forgotten the slight.
However, by default, they have now become the center of conservative Orthodox Christianity in the world. And so, if the corruption within the Roman church becomes too great, many conservative Christians, Catholic and even Protestant, may see communion with the Orthodox churches.
We see transubstantiation in the reverse. Normally with transubstantiation the bread turns into flesh and the wine into blood. With Francis, he turns into a neo Marxist. We are really watch Marx make a mockery of the faith.
Diabolical article. Those who claim the Pope is not Peter are in Hell.
That’s because he isn’t the Pope - Benedict is.
This about says it all:
In Amoris Laetitia we read: “The Church must accompany with attention and care the weakest of her children” (Ch. 8, para. 291). I’m sorry, but that’s not how it is. The Church must convert sinners.
Yes. Teach us how to find Jesus. And show us how to live as God's children in the duties of our daily lives, not just preach we have to be "green" and support a new world order.
and the German Church shennanigans just show that maybe they need some good Filipino and African immigrants to preach the gospel to these heathen.
Not a Catholic but like what this guys says. Nice to see someone with a clear eye and head.
So Bergoglio, who evidently dissociates himself from Apostolic succession and Peter, is in hell?
This is an outright lie.
It's a lie that he dissociates himself from the Apostolic succession.
It's a lie that he dissociates himself from the Petrine office.
And it's a damnable lie that it's evident.
Today is the Feast of the Chair of Saint Peter. And, sadly, a heretic is defiling that Chair.
I read about the Babylonian Captivity, the period in the early 14th century during which there were seven consecutive Popes based out of Avignon and not Rome. I take it we’re not talking about that again, yes?
It asks, Who is the pope? but I did not see an answer. I understand what that would be asked since the SJWP (Social Justice Warrior Pope) today is of a different spirit than those Catholics look to as valid popes, but did not prepare them for deposing a pope like Francis. Not that I look to Rome, having left years ago for conservative evangelical pasture in the land of the living, thank God, not among those mostly spiritually dead.
Other than ‘bishop of Rome,’ yearbook lists papal titles as ‘historic’
No: but unlike Scripture, leadership too often does go South:
"Some years before the rise of the Lutheran and Calvinistic heresy, according to the testimony of those who were then alive, there was almost an entire abandonment of equity in ecclesiastical judgments; in morals, no discipline; in sacred literature, no erudition; in divine things, no reverence; religion was almost extinct. (Concio XXVIII. Opp. Vi. 296- Colon 1617, in “A History of the Articles of Religion,” by Charles Hardwick, Cp. 1, p. 10,)
• The Avignon Papacy (1309-76) relocated the throne to France and was followed by the Western Schism (1378-1417), with three rival popes excommunicating each other and their sees. Referring to the schism of the 14th and 15th centuries,
•Cardinal Ratzinger observed,
"For nearly half a century, the Church was split into two or three obediences that excommunicated one another, so that every Catholic lived under excommunication by one pope or another, and, in the last analysis, no one could say with certainty which of the contenders had right on his side. The Church no longer offered certainty of salvation; she had become questionable in her whole objective form--the true Church, the true pledge of salvation, had to be sought outside the institution.“
"It is against this background of a profoundly shaken ecclesial consciousness that we are to understand that Luther, in the conflict between his search for salvation and the tradition of the Church, ultimately came to experience the Church, not as the guarantor, but as the adversary of salvation. (Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, head of the Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith for the Church of Rome, “Principles of Catholic Theology,” trans. by Sister Mary Frances McCarthy, S.N.D. (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1989) p.196). http://www.whitehorseinn.org/blog/2012/06/13/whos-in-charge-here-the-illusions-of-church-infallibility/)
Catholic historian Paul Johnson additionally described the existing social situation among the clergy during this period leading up to the Refomation:
“Probably as many as half the men in orders had ‘wives’ and families. Behind all the New Learning and the theological debates, clerical celibacy was, in its own way, the biggest single issue at the Reformation. It was a great social problem and, other factors being equal, it tended to tip the balance in favour of reform. As a rule, the only hope for a child of a priest was to go into the Church himself, thus unwillingly or with no great enthusiasm, taking vows which he might subsequently regret: the evil tended to perpetuate itself.” (History of Christianity, pgs 269-270)
Ooh, a fact. The Devil loves to use facts.
Pope Francis claims succession from Peter.
http://www.vatican.va/content/vatican/en/holy-father/san-pietro.html
The problem. is this is what happens when you give any man the blasphemous title Vkcar if Christ and Holy Father and set them up to be infallible in matters if faith. Peter (not the first pope or even leader of the entire church at that time) would be appalled. As should all Christians
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.