Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COMING ON CLOUDS
Prophecy Questions Blog ^ | February 14, 2021 | Charles S. Meek

Posted on 02/14/2021 1:33:46 PM PST by grumpa

“For as the lightning comes from the east and flashes to the west, so also will be the COMING of the Son of Man. . . . the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. . . . and they will see the Son of Man COMING on the CLOUDS of heaven with power and great glory. . . . Truly, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.” (Matthew 24:27-34)

If Jesus was to “come” FROM HEAVEN as the DIVINE SON OF GOD, AFTER HIS ASCENSION and GLORIFICATION, how would it look? How would the original audience have understood these prophecies? Wouldn’t they associate Jesus’ “Second Coming” in some way with the COMINGS OF YHWH in the Old Testament? The Second Coming passages in the New Testament are about Jesus’ soon JUDGMENT, i.e. WRATH, upon the apostate Jews living in his day (Matthew 3:7-9; 19:28; 21:33-45; 22:1-14; 23:29-24:2; 26:63-66; Luke 21:1-24, 29-33; 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16; Revelation 6:12-17; 22:6-20; etc.). This was to punish the Jews for their sins and failure to accept Him as Messiah (Matthew 23:29-24:2) and for their participation with the Roman authorities in Jesus’ crucifixion (Matthew 27:25).

Note that Jesus judges like the Father per John 5:21-27.

Matthew 24 is packed with prophetic imagery, including CLOUDS and COSMIC DISTURBANCES. People who are not familiar with biblical apocalyptic imagery assume that such language is strictly literal. When Jesus comes again, He will appear as a 5-foot-5 Jewish man literally riding a cloud (on a white horse per Revelation 19) to assume his literal throne in Jerusalem (Luke 31:32). But that’s a misunderstanding of the Bible. Bear with me.

In the first century, the Jews expected a worldly, political Messianic king to appear and take charge and restore the kingdom. Fast forward to today, premillennial Christians hope for something similar from Jesus. But their understanding of biblical prophecy is as flawed as the Jews’ was. Jesus insisted that his kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36; Luke 17:20)!

While humans want a worldly king, that idea was expressly described as abhorrent by God in 1 Samuel 8:4-7. In this passage, an earthly king was not honoring to God because it was tantamount to rejecting God in heaven. The New Testament teaches that Jesus is reigning NOW in heaven (Hebrews 8:1-4). He is with us now. We don’t need an earthly king.

While this may be startling to most evangelicals, there is overwhelming evidence that Jesus’ coming on clouds happened at the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 66-70. Not only a careful analysis of biblical prophecy supports this, but, interestingly, there is external evidence too. Period historians Josephus and Tacitus independently reported eyewitness sightings of an angelic army in chariots in the clouds above Judea during this time. That satisfies the visibility requirement of such texts as Revelation 1:7 (“every eye will see Him”).

I dare say that not one Christian in a hundred understands the Old Testament context of New Testament prophecy. Let’s examine the biblical evidence that Jesus’ Parousia (his “effectual divine presence”) happened at the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70—in a real, but not in a 100% literal way. It was a “coming in judgment” against Old Covenant Israel, who had become apostate and exceedingly sinful (Matthew 23:29-29), refused to accept Jesus as Messiah (Matthew 23:37), and participated with the Roman authorities to have Him killed (John 19:15). This is the preterist view of eschatology.

The nature of the Second Coming is, in part, determined by its timing. Jesus promised that all such prophecies would happen in his generation (Matthew 24:34). There are over 100 passages in the New Testament that affirm this time constraint (“must shortly take place,” “about to happen,” “before some standing here taste death,” “the time is near,” “soon,” etc.) Consider Matthew 10:23; 16:27-28; 23:36; 26:64; Revelation 1:1-3; 22:6-10; etc.

In the Old Testament, CLOUDS are used symbolically to portray God’s presence, judgment, or proclamation. People did not see God literally, but saw what He did or perceived his presence in other ways. Consider the following passage excerpts, where clouds are God’s FIGURATIVE abode or mode of travel. Often this is about God’s judgment on nations or God’s enemies:

“The Lord descended in a CLOUD and stood with him there . . .” (Exodus 34:5-7)

“He made darkness his covering, his canopy around him, thick CLOUDS dark with water. . . and the foundations of the world were laid bare.” (Psalm 18:4-15, judgment against David’s enemies)

“And the Lord is riding on a swift CLOUD and comes to Egypt, and the idols of Egypt will tremble at his presence. . . .” (Isaiah 19:1-15, judgment against Egypt)

Please do some Bible study. Take a minute to look up these additional passages: Exodus 13:21; 16:10; 19:9; 33:9; Leviticus 16:2; Numbers 9:15-22; 11:25; Deuteronomy 4:11; 5:22; 31:15; 2 Samuel 22:8-15; 1 Kings 8:10-11; 2 Chronicles 5:14; Psalm 97:2-5; 104:3; Jeremiah 4:13; Ezekiel 1:4, 27-28; 10:3-4, 18-19; 30:3, 18-19; Daniel 7:13-14; Joel 2:1-2; Nahum 1:2-6; Zephaniah 1:14-15.

Jesus, in the Olivet Discourse was claiming deity when He spoke of himself as “coming with clouds.” So, when we read Matthew 24, in light of this Old Testament language, we understand that Jesus’ Second Coming was a “coming in judgment” upon Israel, expressed in highly figurative, but common Hebraic apocalyptic language.

In addition to the cloud-language we see other astronomical perturbations associated with Jesus’ presence in judgment—sun darkened, stars falling, heaven shaken. This too is Old Testament non-literal imagery describing God’s “coming” in judgment. No one actually saw God, but certainly saw the EFFECTS of his judgment.

This coming/presence in judgment of Jesus in AD 70 was similar to YHWH’s previous judgments against his enemies on multiple occasions in the Old Testament. In the Old Testament, God used opposing armies to effect his judgment, including using the Babylonian army to conquer apostate Judah/Jerusalem in 586 BC. In the New Testament, God used the Roman army to punish Israel for their sins, failure to accept Jesus as Messiah, and for the Jews’ role in his crucifixion.

Compare the similar language of cosmic disturbances in Matthew 24:27-31 with these Old Testament judgment passages: Isaiah 13:10-13 (against Babylon), Isaiah 34:4-10 (against Edom), Jeremiah 4:23-31 (against Judah and Jerusalem), Ezekiel 32:7-8 (against Pharaoh and Egypt), Joel 3:15-16 (against the nations), Amos 5:20, 8:9 (against Israel), Micah 1:2-16 (against Israel and Judah), Zephaniah 1:14-18 (against Judah, Jerusalem, and Judah’s enemies).

The New Testament writers emphatically taught that Jesus would return while many of his contemporaries were still alive (2 Thessalonians 1:6-8; Hebrews 1:2; 10:37; James 5:7-9; 1 Peter 1:13-20; 2 Peter 3:9-12; 1 John 1:18; etc.). Where did they get this? From Jesus himself, of course (Matthew 10:23; 16:27-28; 24:29-34; 26:64). I, for one, believe that Jesus fulfilled his promises in exactly the time and nature that He predicted. If He did not, He was a false prophet.


TOPICS: Theology
KEYWORDS: clouds; coming; judgment; second
For more information, see my article “What Is a Coming of God?”:

https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AC%5Fxs5ggEpfZLwM&cid=D3BD424B0B25B83F&id=D3BD424B0B25B83F%2116804&parId=D3BD424B0B25B83F%21113&o=OneUp

And much more at my website, including article on Daniel and Revelation:

www.ProphecyQuestions.com

1 posted on 02/14/2021 1:33:46 PM PST by grumpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grumpa

I prefer discussing subjects that rhyme with wussy


2 posted on 02/14/2021 1:37:40 PM PST by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

bookmark


3 posted on 02/14/2021 1:41:12 PM PST by GOP Poet (Super cool you can change your tag line EVERYTIME you post!! :D. (Small things make me happy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

What the Son of Man COMING on the CLOUDS of heaven with power and great glory might look like:

https://youtu.be/49eIoaY8pVM?t=564


4 posted on 02/14/2021 1:41:45 PM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpa
I agree, Jesus fulfilled his promises as promised in the Olivet Discourse. He was speaking to His contemporaries. This generation meant their time within 40 years. It was fulfilled with the destruction of the temple and the end of the Jewish age.
5 posted on 02/14/2021 1:47:34 PM PST by Keen-Minded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpa
"While it is a minority view today, many Christians down through the ages have not understood passages about Jesus’ Parousia be a future literal physical-bodily appearance. Rather, they have understood it as a “coming in judgment” in AD 70."

The majority of Christians in the world today would take a partial-preterist view: that Jesus came in judgment on Jerusalem in AD 70, but this was also a foreshadowing of his Second Coming at the end of time. Catholics and Orthodox make up the majority of Christians in the world, and (if they are educated in the teachings of their own Church) they would by-and-large, hold this partial-preterist view. However, most of the pew-sitting members of those churches are not interested enough in eschatology to even know what their own Church teaches.

The pre-millennial/dispensationalist view of the End Times is, in fact, a minority position among Christians-- historically and even today. It is very popular among American based evangelical/fundamentalist/non-denominational Christians and those who they have influenced and it is the most well know on a popular level because they have more enthusiastically promoted it in books, sermons, and movies.

6 posted on 02/14/2021 2:05:41 PM PST by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

That cloud motif is everywhere! And you’re right, it’s validated in the historical record in stunning specificity, and not just by Josephus and Tacitus. The Jewish historians Hegesippus and Yosippon back up the visual wonders of armies coming on clouds in the Jerusalem siege.

[YOSIPPON, ch. 87] For one year before Vespasian came, a single great star shining like unsheathed swords was seen over the Temple. And in those days when the sign was seen it was the holiday of Passover and during that entire night the Temple was lit up and illuminated like the light of day, and thus it was all seven days of the Passover. All the sages of Jerusalem knew that it was a malevolent sign, but the rest of the ignorant people said that it was a benevolent sign. … Now it happened after this that there was seen from above over the Holy of Holies for the whole night the outline of a man’s face, the like of whose beauty had never been seen in all the land, and his appearance was quite awesome. Moreover, in those days were seen chariots of fire and horsemen, a great force flying across the sky near to the ground coming against Jerusalem and all the land of Judah, all of them horses of fire and riders of fire. When the holiday of Shavu’oth came in those days, during the night the priests heard within the Temple something like the sound of men going and the sound of men marching in a multitude going into the Temple, and a terrible and mighty voice was heard speaking: “Let’s go and leave this House.

[HEGESIPPUS, ch. 44] Also after many days a certain figure appeared of tremendous size, which many saw, just as the books of the Jews (e.g. Yosippon?) have disclosed, and before the setting of the sun there were suddenly seen in the clouds chariots and armed battle arrays, by which the cities of all Judaea and its territories were invaded. Moreover in the celebration itself of the Pentecost the priests entering the interior of the temple at night time, that they might celebrate the usual sacrifices, asserted themselves at first to have felt a certain movement and a sound given forth, afterwards even to have heard shouted in a sudden voice: “We cross over from here.”


7 posted on 02/14/2021 2:25:21 PM PST by Paul_cibolo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

Bkmk


8 posted on 02/14/2021 2:44:51 PM PST by sauropod (#ImpeachMcConnell. #Resist. #NotMyPresident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

I think what you claimed is correct: Not one Christian in 100 understands the Bible like you do.


9 posted on 02/14/2021 4:01:46 PM PST by Dogbert41 (Proud member of the Poor Boy Gang. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fidelis
The pre-millennial/dispensationalist view of the End Times is, in fact, a minority position among Christians-- historically and even today.

I was completely unaware that Truth is decided by majority Vote!

"And what was the divine reply to him? "I have reserved for Myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal." (Romans 11:4)

10 posted on 02/14/2021 4:30:03 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (I'd rather be anecdotally alive than scientifically dead... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
”I was completely unaware that Truth is decided by majority Vote!”

I didn’t say that it was. I didn’t say anything about what was or was not the correct view. I was just commenting on the assertion made by the writer that most Christians believe a certain thing he mentioned.

11 posted on 02/14/2021 4:52:25 PM PST by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

If Jesus was not God Himself, God in the flesh, God Incarnate... then those words He spoke would be blasphemous. Jesus WAS God.


12 posted on 02/14/2021 5:28:30 PM PST by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

Please do some Bible study. Take a minute to look up these additional passages: Exodus 13:21; 16:10; 19:9; 33:9; Leviticus 16:2; Numbers 9:15-22; 11:25; Deuteronomy 4:11; 5:22; 31:15; 2 Samuel 22:8-15; 1 Kings 8:10-11; 2 Chronicles 5:14; Psalm 97:2-5; 104:3; Jeremiah 4:13; Ezekiel 1:4, 27-28; 10:3-4, 18-19; 30:3, 18-19; Daniel 7:13-14; Joel 2:1-2; Nahum 1:2-6; Zephaniah 1:14-15.

Imagine if Jesus had talked like that. He'd have fit right in with all the number-crunching experts, instead of being villified and crucified by them.

He's the man who really knows Numbers. It goes a long way in explaining why he would head off into the wilderness.

Jesus, in the Olivet Discourse was claiming deity when He spoke of himself as “coming with clouds.”

If the Messiah believed the settled doctrines, he's never recognize himself!

There's a man who leads a life of danger
To everyone he meets he stays a stranger
With every move he makes another chance he takes
The odds are he won't live to see tomorrow

Secret Agent Man
Secret Agent Man
They've given you a number and taken away your name

JOHNNY RIVERS - Secret Agent Man 1966

13 posted on 02/14/2021 6:21:30 PM PST by Ezekiel (The pun is mightier than the s-word. Goy to the World!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson