Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Gay Proselytizers Lose Suit Against City
Religion Clause ^ | 12/2/20 | Howard Friedman

Posted on 12/03/2020 5:51:27 PM PST by marshmallow

In Waldrop v. City of Johnson City,Tennessee, (ED TN, Nov. 30, 2020), a Tennessee federal district court dismissed a suit by several individuals who were distributing religious literature at a gay pride event. Plaintiffs claimed that their free speech and free exercise rights were infringed when they were required by police to move from the entrance to the park where the event was being held to a nearby sidewalk. The court said in part:

The evidence supports only the conclusion that the officers escorted Plaintiffs from Founders Park, and voiced any attendant warnings to them about their return there, in response to their obstruction of the entrance—a content-neutral reason for their removal. The record is simply without evidence showing that Lieutenant Peters or any other officer moved Plaintiffs away from Founders Park for any other reason, much less for the reason that the content of Plaintiffs’ message was offensive or disagreeable.

(Excerpt) Read more at religionclause.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda

1 posted on 12/03/2020 5:51:27 PM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Can Hatred of Christians Lead to Support of Sexual Minorities?
https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2019/03/50399/


2 posted on 12/03/2020 5:58:17 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

trying to campaign for religious purposes and nonreligious purposes at the same time?


3 posted on 12/03/2020 6:24:03 PM PST by scilover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

What is “anti-gay”?

Is that like calling pro-life people “anti-choice”?


4 posted on 12/03/2020 7:06:35 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

“obstruction of the entrance...”

It is rude to block entrances. Video will prove whether the protestors blocked the entrance.


5 posted on 12/03/2020 10:06:45 PM PST by Falconspeed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
in response to their obstruction of the entrance—a content-neutral reason for their removal.

Hmm.. were they actually blocking the entrance? Were they given ample opportunity to cease blocking the entrance, before being forcibly removed?
6 posted on 12/04/2020 6:23:07 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson