Quote-’Every time I have asked on this forum for proof that the “new testament” is truly divinely inspired my opponent has completely ignored my request and merely quoted NT verses. ‘
The four gospels in the New Testament have divinely inspired discrepancies and contradictions that, for 2,000 years, couldn’t really look like divinely inspired.
That’s the beauty of the ‘about 2,000’ swine reference in Mark, the 2nd book.
It so describes the last 2,000 years.
And it’s a number that is found in an interesting place in the Old Covenant.
Joshua.
The distance natural Israel was to be kept from the ark while passing into the Promised Land.
People born 500 years ago couldn’t understand that clue in the Old and New Testaments.
People born today can.
The world may not understand the last 2,000 years were predicted in both the Old and New Testaments.
The fact the number of 2,000 was only recorded in Mark is a divinely inspired clue/riddle/mystery.
And the fact that John doesn’t have the account is another divinely inspired clue/riddle/mystery.
Not an insignificant mystery either. mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven.
It helps to have the Key to unlock the mysteries.
The Key is the Messiah of Israel, Torah Made Flesh, the Passover Lamb.
And what He has divinely inspired to be written in the New Testament about what was, what is, and what is to come.
Dude - you ask for WHY a series is divinely inspired and then ignore quotes from the texts in question?
Why is the book of Numbers divinely inspired according to you?
The gospels are divinely inspired as they show clearly a man prophesying the future destruction of the temple.
Now why do you, dechiante, say that the book of Numbers is divinely inspired?