Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos

Not only was I for a 2nd front (not war) against Iran, wmd or no wmd, but when Turkey refused a northern attack, I was for going though Syria instead for a bonus. No place to hide wmd. I would have brought all Islam down from the center out and we wouldn’t even be talking about it today except in the past tense.


22 posted on 10/14/2020 1:07:54 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Thank you for the civilized discussion. It’s too easy for these online what-ifs to descend into slur-slinging matches.

The thing is - Syria, I believe is a secular protector of Christianity.

And Iran is not, imho, the nexus of Islamic problems — that lies in Saudi Arabia and Wahabbism. The 9/11 attackers, all the attacks on Western Europe and the USA and Beslan and Mumbai 2008 etc. were all Wahhabis from Saudi Arabia.

taking out Islam is laudable, but to do that is to nuke Makkah


23 posted on 10/14/2020 2:46:08 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson