From: Acts 15:22-31
The Council’s Decision
The Reception of the Council’s Decree
***********************************************************************
Commentary:
22-29. The decree containing the decisions of the Council of Jerusalem incorporating St. James’ suggestions makes it clear that the
participants at the Council are conscious of being guided in their conclusions by the Holy Spirit and that in the last analysis it is God
who has decided the matter.
“We should take,” Melchor Cano writes in the 16th century, “the same road as the Apostle Paul considered to be the one best suited to
solving all matters to do with the doctrine of the faith. [...] The Gentiles might have sought satisfaction from the Council because it
seemed to take from the freedom granted them by Jesus Christ, and because it imposed on the disciples certain ceremonies as necessary, when in fact they were not, since faith is the key to salvation. Nor did the Jews object by invoking Sacred Scripture against the Council’s decision on the grounds that Scripture seems to support their view that circumcision is necessary for salvation. So, by respecting the Council they gave us the criterion which should be observed at all times; that is, to place full faith in the authority of the synods confirmed by Peter and his legitimate successors. They say ‘it has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us’; thus, the Council’s decision is the decision of the Holy Spirit Himself” (”De Locis”, V, 4).
It is the Apostles and the elders, with the whole Church, who designate the people who are to publish the Council’s decree, but it is the
Hierarchy which formulates and promulgates it. The text contains two parts—one dogmatic and moral (verse 28) and the other disciplinary (verse 29). The dogmatic part speaks of imposing no burden other than what is essential and therefore declares that pagan converts are free from the obligation of circumcision and of the Mosaic Law but are subject to the Gospel’s perennial moral teaching on matters to do with chastity. This part is permanent: because it has to do with a necessary part of God’s salvific will it cannot change.
The disciplinary part of the decree lays down rules of prudence which can change, which are temporary. It asks Christians of Gentile
background to abstain—out of charity towards Jewish Christiansfrom what has been sacrificed to idols, from blood and from meat of animals killed by strangulation.
The effect of the decree means that the disciplinary rules contained in it, although they derive from the Mosaic Law, no longer oblige by virtue of that Law but rather by virtue of the authority of the Church, which has decided to apply them for the time being. What matters is not what Moses says but what Christ says through the Church. The Council “seems to maintain the Law in force,” writes St. John Chrysostom, “because it selects various prescriptions from it, but in fact suppresses it, because it does not accept ALL its prescriptions. It had often spoken about these points, it sought to respect the Law and yet establish these regulations as coming not from Moses but from the Apostles” (”Hom. on Acts,” 33).
From: John 15:9-17
The Vine and the Branches (Continuation)
The Law of Love
***********************************************************************
Commentary:
9-11. Christ’s love for Christians is a reflection of the love the Three Divine Persons have for one another and for all men: “We love, because He first loved us” (1 John 4:19).
The certainty that God loves us is the source of Christian joy (verse 11), but it is also something which calls for a fruitful response on our part, which should take the form of a fervent desire to do God’s will in everything, that is, to keep His commandments, in imitation of Jesus Christ, who did the will of His Father (cf. John 4:34).
12-15. Jesus insists on the “new commandment”, which He Himself keeps by giving His life for us. See note on John 13:34-35.
Christ’s friendship with the Christian, which our Lord expresses in a very special way in this passage, is something very evident in [St] Monsignor Escriva de Balaguer’s preaching: “The life of the Christian who decides to behave in accordance with the greatness of his vocation is so to speak a prolonged echo of those words of our Lord, `No longer do I call you My servants; a servant is one who does not understand what his master is about, whereas I have made known to you all that My Father has told Me; and so I have called you My friends’ (John 15:15). When we decide to be docile and follow the will of God, hitherto unimagined horizons open up before us.... `There is nothing better than to recognize that Love has made us slaves of God. From the moment we recognize this we cease being slaves and become friends, sons’ ([St] J. Escriva, “Friends of God”, 35).
“Sons of God, FRIENDS OF GOD.... Jesus is truly God and truly Man, He is our Brother and our Friend. If we make the effort to get to know Him well `we will share in the joy of being God’s friends’ [”ibid.”, 300]. If we do all we can to keep Him company, from Bethlehem to Calvary, sharing His joys and sufferings, we will become worthy of entering into loving conversation with Him. As the Liturgy of the Hours sings, “calicem Domini biberunt, et amici Dei facti sunt” (they drank the chalice of the Lord and so became friends of God).
“Being His children and His friends are two inseparable realities for those who love God. We go to Him as children, carrying on a trusting dialogue that should fill the whole of our lives; and we go to Him as friends.... In the same way our divine sonship urges us to translate the overflow of our interior life into apostolic activity, just as our friendship with God leads us to place ourselves at `the service of all men. We are called to use the gifts God has given us as instruments to help others discover Christ’ [”ibid.”, 258]” (Monsignor A. del Portillo in his preface to [St] J. Escriva’s, “Friends of God”).
16. There are three ideas contained in these words of our Lord. One, that the calling which the Apostles received and which every Christian also receives does not originate in the individual’s good desires but in Christ’s free choice. It was not the Apostles who chose the Lord as Master, in the way someone would go about choosing a rabbi; it was Christ who chose them. The second idea is that the Apostles’ mission and the mission of every Christian is to follow Christ, to seek holiness and to contribute to the spread of the Gospel. The third teaching refers to the effectiveness of prayer done in the name of Christ; which is why the Church usually ends the prayers of the liturgy with the invocation “Through Jesus Christ our Lord...”.
The three ideas are all interconnected: prayer is necessary if the Christian life is to prove fruitful, for it is God who gives the growth (cf. 1 Corinthians 3:7); and the obligation to seek holiness and to be apostolic derives from the fact that it is Christ Himself who has given us this mission. “Bear in mind, son, that you are not just a soul who has joined other souls in order to do a good thing.
“That is a lot, but it’s still little. You are the Apostle who is carrying out an imperative command from Christ” ([St] J. Escriva, “The Way”, 942).