Ease up accuser.
Receiving in the hand is licit per the Church. You don’t have to like it but you don’t get to make the rules.
For our previous notes I know you have deep devotion to our Lord and our Church You might want to think about using your knowledge, talents and experience to engage instead of attacking. Calling someone a monster because you disagree is less than charitable, and certainly not engaging.
Though I am sure haters love seeing the infighting...
All the best.
Sorry but I think anyone, except for priests, who manhandles the Body of Christ are monsters.
And you're right. I don't make the rules. That's why I choose to go to TLM's where this none of that nonsense.
So is Holy Communion for the divorced and remarried, per the Pope.
Read the GIRM, General Instructions of the Roman Missal. It never changed.
It was the U. S. bishops who did this.
You might want to think about using your knowledge, talents and experience to engage instead of attacking.
...............................................
So give us an idea/example of what you mean by suggesting that ebb tide should “engage” in regard to the practice of administering communion in the paw, I mean in the hand. I can’t speak for ebb tide, but I am categorically opposed to it for the reasons I’ve explained elsewhere on this thread. And all the explanations and rationale for introducing the practice is never going to change my thinking. Therefore engaging others about it would only serve as an opportunity to explain why it’s a practice I will never believe to be acceptable.