Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ Defends Photographer Who Nixes Same-Sex ‘Wedding’
Church Militant ^ | 3/4/20 | Bradley Eli

Posted on 03/06/2020 5:36:52 PM PST by marshmallow

Officials: 'Chelsey Nelson is likely to succeed on her claim'

WASHINGTON (ChurchMilitant.com) - The Department of Justice (DOJ) is protecting a young female photographer from having to participate in same-sex "weddings" against her conscience.

The DOJ filed a "Statement of Interest" in federal court on Thursday explaining that a law in Louisville, Kentucky violates the U.S. Constitution by compelling local Chelsey Nelson to photograph gay weddings.

The U.S. brief explains that Nelson "is likely to succeed on her claim that requiring her to photograph weddings against her conscience constitutes government-compelled speech that violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment," according to a DOJ press release issued Thursday.

The Louisville-based photographer sued the Louisville/Jefferson County metro government in November owing to the city's "fairness ordinance" that made it illegal for her to refuse to photograph same-sex "weddings."

The law further forbids Nelson from using her website or social media to explain to potential customers the religious reasons behind her exclusive support for heterosexual wedding ceremonies.

(Excerpt) Read more at churchmilitant.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: bakethecake; homophobia; homosexualagenda; persecution

1 posted on 03/06/2020 5:36:52 PM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Wish they would protect the men who have had these same issues.

Stinking gynocracy.


2 posted on 03/06/2020 5:38:15 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Towns and cities and states need to not be passing “laws” that override the Constitution of the United States.

It’s not a law then. There’s another word for it.


3 posted on 03/06/2020 5:39:05 PM PST by dp0622 (Radicals, racists Don't point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin to make ends meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

That there is a problem with any business refusing to do business with whomever they choose is a big fat unconstitutional government’s nose way up citizens’ butts.


4 posted on 03/07/2020 2:07:21 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian (I'm a nationalist.I'm white.Does that mean I'm racist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

bump


5 posted on 03/07/2020 9:56:24 AM PST by Albion Wilde (Party that freed sIaves, passed Civil Rights is called racist by the party that started the KKK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson