Posted on 12/20/2019 11:04:23 PM PST by Morgana
Christianity Todaywhich relies on the name of its founder Billy Graham but increasingly not his wisdom or characterhas called for the removal of President Donald Trump because of his immoral behavior. The Editor in Chief, Mark Galli, was not ambiguous in this proclamation: Trump Should Be Removed From Office. Well, we dont remove Presidents for mere immoral behavior. That wouldve required the removal of all of them. Theres a reason why the Constitution is the Law of the Land and not our subjective and misapplied understanding of Scripture.
Franklin Graham called out the magazine on social media saying, in part: Yes, @BillyGraham founded Christianity Today; but no, he would not agree w/ their piece. Hed be disappointed. He later tweeted this revealing fact about his father: I hadnt shared who my father @BillyGraham voted for in 2016, but because of @CTMagazines article, I felt it necessary to share now. My father knew @realDonaldTrump, believed in him & voted for him. He believed Donald J. Trump was the man for this hour in history for our nation.
Uhhh, mic drop.
Christianity Today didnt call for the removal of a Presidential PredatorBill Clinton. In their 1998 article entitled The Prodigal Who Didnt Come Home, they lamented his inadequate apology. According to CT, Clinton merely missed a truly historic moment with what couldve been a straightforward admission. But the conclusion of the article really showed the progressive magazines hopes for the impeached President: At this writing, we expect Clinton to hang tough, to remain the comeback kid he is known to be.
That was gracious.
Then there was the 1974 CT editorial that asked the question Should Nixon Resign? In it, there is never a call for removal. The transcripts show him to be a person who has failed gravely to live up to the moral demands of our Judeo-Christian heritage. We do not expect perfection, but we rightly expect our leaders, and especially our President, to practice a higher level of morality than the tapes reveal, writes CT. I agree with those sentiments exactly. We should expect so much more from our elected leaders. It is tragic how Christians, too often, repeatedly justify political corruption over personal character all in the name of Party allegiance. The following two sentences show CTs blatant contradiction, though: Yet the Constitution does not provide for the removal of a President because of moral flaws. To resign would be to leave the presidency for other than a constitutional offense.
Christianity Today, and many other liberal evangelical outlets, rightfully point out the moral failings in (select) elected leaders. Yet they often fail to apply the same standards to those on the Left, especially when those politicians are advocating issues that CT champions. But where was the call for removal of President Barack Obama? For the first time in history, an American President keynoted a fundraising gala for the leading killer of those made in Gods imagePlanned Parenthood. Though Obama campaigned on middle ground rhetoric regarding abortion, he never sought it as President. In fact, he was the most radically pro-abortion President in history. Eerily echoing Democrat Governor George Wallaces famous segregation declaration, Obama proclaimed at the gala: Planned Parenthood is not going anywhere. Its not going anywhere today. Its not going anywhere tomorrow. The response from the crowd was thunderous applause. He ended the speech to the organization that kills over 330,000 of the most marginalized and most victimized in our society: God Bless Planned Parenthood!
But enabling and supporting the shedding of innocent blood apparently isnt enough for Christianity Today to have called for the ousting of President Barack Obama. That behavior wasnt immoral enough for his removal.
I wish the evangelical Left were just as concerned about Christians support of the immoral behavior of movie and music celebrities, whose lifestyles are heavily funded by those who should value loyalty to the Creator of the Ten Commandments. Why is this outrage relegated only to political leaders?
CT does the same thing as mainstream media. They promote a simplistic narrative in order to demonize an entire demographic. In this instance, they claim that evangelicals who support Trump brush off Mr. Trumps immoral words and behaviors in the cause of political expediency. I never have. I find his past and even some current behavior reprehensiblewhether its marital infidelity, unpresidential rally remarks or demeaning tweets. I find the Lefts obsession with demonizing and distorting his every action and word equally as immoral. Slander is a sin, too, people. Ill never be invited, like many of my colleagues, to the Trump White House. Ive never been a Trump apologist, but I will defend the rule of law. I know the alternative to a Trump presidency wouldve been a Hillary Clinton presidency. I didnt choose the lesser of two evils. I chose to vote my conscience with a Party platform that aligns with my faith and common sense.
Ill keep praying for Trump and every other morally flawed politician who doesnt have the privilege of daily denouncements.
As a Christian who happens to be an evangelical, Im not worried about what CT laments as the consequence of not removing Trump from office: It will crash down on the reputation of the evangelical religion. I dont live for an evangelical religion. I live for Christ. If Trump, or any other President, were actually found guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors, I would fully advocate his or her Constitutional removal. This sham impeachment process is not it.
Until then, I consider this partisan feigned outrage more of the predictable noise from the Left that well continue to hear through the 2020 elections and beyond.
“the evangelical Left “
I think this is proof that God does not micromanage His people.
Christians can be liberal as well as conservative in politics.
False prophesy. If you claim to be Christian but preach socialism and worldly political correctness instead, your spirit is from Satan, not God.
I guess the magazine, Christianity Today, is looking for Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, or those of the socialist/communist bent, to guard their religion. How about Sleepy Joe? The fact is, no President has ever done what I have done for Evangelicals, or religion itself!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 20, 2019
CT has become the Chick-fil-A of Christian publications.
Oh ye hippocrits. You generation of vipers.
bump
“Religious” Left, substituting their judgement for God’s since time immemorial.
A lot of “political Christianity” was exposed as a farce when TWO black “ministers” (Jackson, Sharpton) ran for president without anyone voicing concern about separating Church and state. They are as “christian” as Christianity Today.
Galli and pope frank should get a room.
Obviously taken over by SJW.
Meanwhile, President Trump prays for America and calls for Americans to make America great and to trust in God: "In God We Trust!" ~President Donald Trump.
President Trump is on the side of the Angels and Jesus Christ. It is to Him that President Trump prays. It is They whom President Trump has allied himself with.
Amen.
“Christians can be liberal as well as conservative in politics.”
NEW Christians can be. But with time, the Holy Spirit will lead them away from endorsing abortion and sexual immorality. Both of which are now required to be a democrat.
The far left and the far right are forgetting the normal, hardworking, good people that are normal left and normal right.
I suspect you consider yourself to be “normal”. Based on where I live, I’m “normal”. By SF / NY standards, I’m an extremist conservative.
I think the polls are starting to show that Trump has not forgotten normal people while democrats have no clue they exist.
In too many churches today, they worship a “new and improved” god that isn’t too judgemental about a person’s lifestyle. A god that’s made more in our image, who has more human concerns. Global warming, economic inequality, gay rights, stuff like that.
True, but still so sad.
Is this true of most Democrats? Pro abortion and sexual immorality?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.