Posted on 12/07/2019 7:44:43 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
While you have been out playing church, and downloading all the tracks from satanist Kanye Wests Jesus Is King album, the leader of the worlds largest religion, Pope Francis, has been brazenly bold and open about furthering his plans for the One World Religion of Chrislam. On November 18, Pope Francis stated that the only thing standing in his way of seeing his Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together covenant being realized are those nasty, scourge fundamentalist Bible believers who keep exposing him. I took it as a compliment.
"In todays precarious world, dialogue among religions is not a sign of weakness. It finds its own raison d'être in Gods dialogue with humanity. It is about changing historical attitudes. A scene from The Song of Roland comes to me as a symbol, when the Christians defeat the Muslims and put them all in line in front of the baptismal font, and one with a sword. And Muslims had to choose between baptism or the sword. That is what we Christians did. It was a mentality that today we cannot accept, nor understand, nor can it work anymore. Beware of the fundamentalist groups: everyone has his own. In Argentina too there is a little fundamentalist corner. And let us try, with fraternity, to go forward. Fundamentalism is a scourge and all religions have some kind of fundamentalist first cousin there, which forms a group."
Is Frankie trying to be the False Prophet in real-time?
We all know where this is headed.
100% true.
My point, which I think you already know, is that if Benedict is truly the pope, he would act as a pope. Condemnations should be loud and clear, not “understated”...no matter the cost.
Having said that, please share the link that describes how he came out against Bergoglio, understated or not.
No. He means Christian fundamentalists, and he probably doesn’t know exactly what it means. There’s a common misconception that it means interpreting the Bible literally from start to finish.
In any case, I’m sure he means evangelicals, but he didn’t want to say that. We are the greatest enemy of the New World Order. We are in the crosshairs. We are mostly invisible, but will become visible when we refuse to go along with the plan.
He didn’t mean the Muslims and he didn’t mean the Catholics who go to the Latin or other older mass.
Yes, but two of them have already come, so these people are no doubt misreading the passage.
Yes, but two of them have already come, so these people are no doubt misreading the passage.
Christian fundamentalism has a different meaning.
JP 2 was no angel. He was photographed kissing the Koran. Chrislam would apparently have been just fine with him as well. His devotion was to Mary not Christ
I do not know when the moment will come, but like everything else, I place it too in the hands of the Mother of my Master: Totus Tuus. In the same maternal Hands I leave everything and everyone with whom my life and vocation have linked me. In these Hands I leave, above all, the Church, as well as my Nation and all humanity. .
rank blasphemy and idolatry
You mean like the Inquisition?
The forced conversion of Jews to Catholicism during the Crusades?
Like the FRomans here on FR who think that only Catholics should be allowed to vote in this country?
His site seems to be heavy on sensationalist charges.
SkyPilot, I believe that you have nailed the TRUTH here...
“If Jorge isn’t the False Prophet of Revelation, then he is doing a great job auditioning for the role.”
Thanks. Scary times we live in.
Exactly
I see what you are trying to say, but there have been a lot of less-than-dynamic Popes throughout history.
Firstly Pope Benedict is 92, two he is an intellectual and three he grew up in Nazi Germany. None of those things help generate dynamic behavior.
If Benedict believes he resigned all or part of the Papacy, he may feel it’s not his place to make waves. He did on one occasion, when Francis brought 5 new bad Bishops to see him, Pope Benedict reportedly said [’God will win in the end.’]
If someone thinks they are powerless, then they are, they have lost the battle before it even starts.
This might be the right one... maybe...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/11/ex-pope-benedict-xvi-blames-sexual-abuse-on-swinging-sixties
I hope this helps.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.