RE: The question in the first place.
That was a rhetorical question which is answered in the article.
[Jumping into your discussion with “Seek and Find”]
He asked you, in the first place, for specifics for your assertion that the question was “ludicrous”. Your answers have not been specific, but general and without meaning without some explanation. I find your responses evasive (not that I have any authority to make a judgement like that!), but I would appreciate some real specifics to round out your responses.